Tiz,
This conference is even more convincing there is no case and their is government involvement. They haven't even presented videos, charts, documents anything for the press to see!
Even when Sec State Colin Powell was before the UN he had audio and pictures! LMAO!
Also, waiting for the testimony (under oath) from his wife saying he was gone during those time periods the letters were mailed from NYC and FLA. I always let my wife know when I am going on a vacation. And if I went on one without her, fuck man... she would kill me.
ope:The internet is powerful.
Here is the full motive for the mailings of the anthrax by The Central Intelligence Agency. feel free to edit, or add.
There was a stalemate in 2001 with the 107th congress. The Executive Branch (Bush Administration) needed the Legislative Branch (part of the legislative branch is The House of Reps) to approve 2/3 of the vote to pass a very controversial law (The Patriot Act). The Executive Branch (President Bush) was already going to sign the Act as long as it made it to his desk. The is what The Bush Administration needed, the law to get to his desk. If the letters were mailed to a House of Rep democrat, it would be OBVIOUS The Bush Administration was behind this. So they (The CIA under The Bush Administration's order) mailed the letters to two (2) SENATE democrats to not raise suspicion. In fear, those two senate democratic leaders convinced the House of Rep Democrats to vote for the Patriot Act. At the time the 107th Congress House of Representatives was not majority Republican, so it was a stalemate at 50/50. Democrats would had voted along party lines, so they needed to find a way to convince them to vote for it.
The anthrax letters serve two purposes for (The Bush Administration) by the CIA mailing these letters out. It allowed:
1. The American public to be in fear and convince Democrat politicians to vote IN FAVOR of The Patriot Act (Hence why the letters were send to media agencies that were not right wing publications)
and
2. It scared opposing democrats into convincing their colleagues into voting for The Patriot Act.
Bottom line is the CIA is responsible, Dr. Bruce Ivins was murdered. The internet has released THE REAL persons name (Dr. Phillip Zack) who is involved in stealing the samples AND The Patriot Act needs to be REPEALED.
CASE CLOSED. Now write you senator and send this information out to get justice for the 5 INNOCENT people who died and 17 who were injured... as well as the 300 Million who lived in fear.
http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/crime/2008/08/06/meserve.anthrax.probe.cnn
an anthrax scientist says no way he could of produced the high grade powdered anthrax in secrecy
an anthrax scientist says no way he could of produced the high grade powdered anthrax in secrecy
I think the public believes now that the FBI doesn't have their "SLAM DUNK" and that Ivins didn't do this. Shit, if WAS part of this covert CIA operation... that would explain suicide, counseling, psychiatrists, etc that the media is filling us up with.
Could you live with yourself if you were part of a super super Top Secret mission that involve mailing out anthrax to kill and scare your fellow Americans to help advance intrusive legislation like The Patriot Act?
Shit, I would have killed myself right after the mission. But all signs point towards "Foul Play". I still believe he is being framed and was setup, once he found this out he went "crazy" trying to think who was behind it and why they would do it. The CIA tapped the FBI communications with probably the help of Michael Hayden's SIGINT contacts in The NSA, went the FBI got too close to a guy who would blow the lid off this puppy... The CIA "Green Lighted" (killed) him.
CASE SOLVED.
Here is a link to the "overwhelming" FBI evidence at The DOJ website. Use a proxy sever if you don't want your IP logged.
I wouldn't be that paranoid, everybody and their mother is going to this site right now.
I wouldn't be that paranoid, everybody and their mother is going to this site right now.
Thanks hellupay. That is what drives me to do this. For people to finally say, "Shit Mike, you are not some left-wing kook, you actually make sense".
The favor I ask of everyone who agrees with my convictions is to email this thread out to as many people, post it on blogs, etc.
4 days of hard investigation work, have gotten me closer to my end goal, but not quite. I want justice for the 5 victims and an apology from The US Government for blaming Dr. Bruce Ivins who is an innocent man. Get an apology that the CIA murdered him will never come, but the least they can do is say "Dr. Bruce Ivins did not commit these horrible crimes against his fellow Americans".
The other gaols of this post, was to show readers a poster with less than 300 posts may actually know what they are talking about.
And in conclusion, don believe everything you read, hear, or see in the media. Those are the THREE most important sense of your body and they shouldn't have control of those.
//Signed//
Michael Scott
Dunder Mifflin Inc.
Maybe cause we actually cited sources and didn't have the personal attacks and bogus rants like other threads
Hopefully the viewership will only get bigger. Then we can work on repealing the safe ports acts and gamble LEGALLY online
Wish I got paid for this shit. But writing a book is too time consuming, plus I like being anonymous.
More on "Why" the Bush Administration would order a covert CIA operation to send anthrax laced letters to Senate Majority leaders.
Remember, on Sept 18th 2001 when the first anthrax letter was mailed out, the 107th congress was not majority Republican. This was not to raise suspicion, but scare a particular party into passing it in the OTHER chamber (The House of Representatives) The house was split 50/50, so passing laws through BOTH chambers was extremely difficult. Our forefathers, made the constitution have a 2/3 majority in order to put "checks and balances" on fraudulent acts like The Patriot Act.
Here is a list of some of the bullshit legislation passed by The 10th Congress because of the anthrax letters:
USA PATRIOT") Act
Farm Security and Rural Investment Act
Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq
Help America Vote Act
Homeland Security Act
Essentially sending anthrax to scare people into voting for a law(s) is not only, ILLEGAL, but what I consider as TREASON.
Source: http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=How_a_bill_becomes_a_law
"A bill cannot become a law until it has been approved in identical form by both chambers of Congress. After a bill has passed both chambers, it must be made identical via a conference committee.<sup id="_ref-30" class="reference">[31]"
</sup>Here is the full process of how the Patriot Act and other laws get passed. The constitution is a wonderful document.
<sup id="_ref-30" class="reference">
</sup>XIII. Final action on amended bill
A bill cannot become a law until it has been approved in identical form by both chambers of Congress. After a bill has passed both chambers, it must be made identical via a conference committee.<sup id="_ref-30" class="reference">[31]</sup>
The Speaker appoints the House conferees. Usually, these are chosen from the committee that has jurisdiction over the bill in question, and often following the recommendation of that committee chairman. Representation of both major parties is an important attribute of all parliamentary procedures but, in the case of conference committees, it is expected that the views of the chamber of the House on matters in conference be properly represented. The presiding officer of the Senate appoints the conferees, in a manner similar to the House.<sup id="_ref-31" class="reference">[32]</sup>
The conference committee is sometimes popularly referred to as the "Third Chamber of Congress," but conferee powers are limited. They do not have the authority to amend any portion of a bill that has not been amended in either chamber, and they may not insert material that is not germane.<sup id="_ref-32" class="reference">[33]</sup>
If a compromise is reached via the conference committee, the corresponding report containing the amendments must be debated and passed in both chambers without change. If they are not passed, a new conference may be called. When the bill has finally been approved by both chambers, all the original papers are transmitted to the enrolling clerk of the body in which the bill originated.<sup id="_ref-33" class="reference">[34]</sup>
<dl><dd>Main article: How a bill becomes a law/XIII. Final action on amended bill</dd></dl> [edit]
XIV. Enrollment
Once an identical bill has passed in both chambers, the Clerk of the House or Secretary of the Senate (depending on the bills' origin) must ensure that the bill document reflects all of the agreed upon amendments. The bill is then printed, and both the Speaker of the House and either the president of the Senate or the President pro tempore of the Senate must sign the bill. At this point, it is presented to the president.<sup id="_ref-34" class="reference">[35]</sup>
<dl><dd>Main article: How a bill becomes a law/XIV. Enrollment</dd></dl> [edit]
XV. Presidential action
Once a bill has been presented to the president, he/she has ten days of constitutionally allocated time to decide a course of action. The president may approve the bill, by signing it into law. The president may also veto the bill, which sends it back to Congress where it must receive approval by two-thirds of both chambers to override the veto.<sup id="_ref-35" class="reference">[36]</sup>
If the president does not sign or veto the bill after ten days, two outcomes may occur. If Congress is in session, the bill is considered approved. If, however, the Congress has adjourned, the bill does not become law. This is known as a "pocket veto." The extent of pocket veto authority has not been definitively decided by the courts.<sup id="_ref-36" class="reference">[37]</sup>
For a brief period of time (1997 to 1998), the president had the authority to issue a "line item" veto. This allowed the president to veto certain fiscal items in a bill, rather than having to either approve or veto the bill as a whole. Ultimately, this right was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in Clinton v. City of New York (1998).<sup id="_ref-37" class="reference">[38]</sup>
<sup id="_ref-30" class="reference">
</sup>
Remember, on Sept 18th 2001 when the first anthrax letter was mailed out, the 107th congress was not majority Republican. This was not to raise suspicion, but scare a particular party into passing it in the OTHER chamber (The House of Representatives) The house was split 50/50, so passing laws through BOTH chambers was extremely difficult. Our forefathers, made the constitution have a 2/3 majority in order to put "checks and balances" on fraudulent acts like The Patriot Act.
Here is a list of some of the bullshit legislation passed by The 10th Congress because of the anthrax letters:
USA PATRIOT") Act
Farm Security and Rural Investment Act
Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq
Help America Vote Act
Homeland Security Act
Essentially sending anthrax to scare people into voting for a law(s) is not only, ILLEGAL, but what I consider as TREASON.
Source: http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=How_a_bill_becomes_a_law
"A bill cannot become a law until it has been approved in identical form by both chambers of Congress. After a bill has passed both chambers, it must be made identical via a conference committee.<sup id="_ref-30" class="reference">[31]"
</sup>Here is the full process of how the Patriot Act and other laws get passed. The constitution is a wonderful document.
<sup id="_ref-30" class="reference">
</sup>XIII. Final action on amended bill
A bill cannot become a law until it has been approved in identical form by both chambers of Congress. After a bill has passed both chambers, it must be made identical via a conference committee.<sup id="_ref-30" class="reference">[31]</sup>
The Speaker appoints the House conferees. Usually, these are chosen from the committee that has jurisdiction over the bill in question, and often following the recommendation of that committee chairman. Representation of both major parties is an important attribute of all parliamentary procedures but, in the case of conference committees, it is expected that the views of the chamber of the House on matters in conference be properly represented. The presiding officer of the Senate appoints the conferees, in a manner similar to the House.<sup id="_ref-31" class="reference">[32]</sup>
The conference committee is sometimes popularly referred to as the "Third Chamber of Congress," but conferee powers are limited. They do not have the authority to amend any portion of a bill that has not been amended in either chamber, and they may not insert material that is not germane.<sup id="_ref-32" class="reference">[33]</sup>
If a compromise is reached via the conference committee, the corresponding report containing the amendments must be debated and passed in both chambers without change. If they are not passed, a new conference may be called. When the bill has finally been approved by both chambers, all the original papers are transmitted to the enrolling clerk of the body in which the bill originated.<sup id="_ref-33" class="reference">[34]</sup>
<dl><dd>Main article: How a bill becomes a law/XIII. Final action on amended bill</dd></dl> [edit]
XIV. Enrollment
Once an identical bill has passed in both chambers, the Clerk of the House or Secretary of the Senate (depending on the bills' origin) must ensure that the bill document reflects all of the agreed upon amendments. The bill is then printed, and both the Speaker of the House and either the president of the Senate or the President pro tempore of the Senate must sign the bill. At this point, it is presented to the president.<sup id="_ref-34" class="reference">[35]</sup>
<dl><dd>Main article: How a bill becomes a law/XIV. Enrollment</dd></dl> [edit]
XV. Presidential action
Once a bill has been presented to the president, he/she has ten days of constitutionally allocated time to decide a course of action. The president may approve the bill, by signing it into law. The president may also veto the bill, which sends it back to Congress where it must receive approval by two-thirds of both chambers to override the veto.<sup id="_ref-35" class="reference">[36]</sup>
If the president does not sign or veto the bill after ten days, two outcomes may occur. If Congress is in session, the bill is considered approved. If, however, the Congress has adjourned, the bill does not become law. This is known as a "pocket veto." The extent of pocket veto authority has not been definitively decided by the courts.<sup id="_ref-36" class="reference">[37]</sup>
For a brief period of time (1997 to 1998), the president had the authority to issue a "line item" veto. This allowed the president to veto certain fiscal items in a bill, rather than having to either approve or veto the bill as a whole. Ultimately, this right was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in Clinton v. City of New York (1998).<sup id="_ref-37" class="reference">[38]</sup>
<sup id="_ref-30" class="reference">
</sup>
Sorry, it looks like I had it backwards, THE SENATE (after all) was the SPLIT in the 107th Congress. I mistakenly said "House of Reps".
