If 32 GMs were polled and we'll say 300 scouts. What % do you think would take Tannehill over Luck?
I'm willing to concede you might know something the rest of us don't but how unique of an opinion do you think this is?
Maybe 1% side with you max?
More than 1% obviously... Yeah I definitely like Tannehill... but I don't like Luck...
He misses a lot of throws... He holds the ball... He can make every throw.. He has the legs... but he just doesn't pass the eye test.
He's been crowned the next Manning by just about everyone, to your point.... And for what? Bunch of yards and TDs... I'm not saying he's bad... I'm saying he's not top tier.. and I don't think he ever will be...
I think the fact that Tannehills completion ratio is higher would SHOCK 99% of NFL fans... He gets to play the JAGS, TITANS 4x a year. Inflated. overhyped.
I know I would get massacred for this thread.
Best Way I can put it, if Athletes were Stocks, Luck would be 3x overvalued. The world has already accepted he's the next manning and going to win Multiple SBs and that irks me. No way you can BUY Luck stock that high and the fact the entire world has...