I agree.
FWIW.
The "System" is non existent if its over a 50+ year span with only 5 occurrences. I would call it simply Circumstantial.
On a Humorous note.:
Here is a Marc Lawrence like Trend. LOL>
This trend has NEVER lost!
Play on any team in the Super Bowl - that was a winner in their last game, that played the prior game in a cold city location when the temperature was under 80 degrees in January, but was cold enough to snow, and had at least one caucasian QB who won the game the week before, but did or didn't cover the spread, but needs to win this game providing there is a QB that is older or younger than the other by at least 10 years, but may or not cover against the spread, while each team has a winning record against the other during the regular season, but either won or lost by 3 points or less, who won in the stats, or had more turnovers than the opponent, who could have been the home dog by almost the same spread in this upcoming game, while neither team scored over 27 points nor less than 24 but happen to be playing in the same location for the Super Bowl that the regular season game was played - but has at least one QB that is now playing in a different conference for the first time, who was expected to be washed up by his former team, which was originally in the same conference as the team he is now playing in this SB, but in different divisions, of which he beat that team last year, but actually won his new conference, Conference Championship game to get here as a underdog - in 2 of 3 prior playoff games - all on the road - but won all 3 SU.
Play on The Winner to cover the spread. (Just as a back up, play the game in the second half if it gets one sided on the scoreboard in the first half.)
mark lawrence to a T
PERFECT EXAMPLE
lmao