Perfect 5-0 Super Bowl system in play this year.

[pizza]

I agree.

FWIW.
The "System" is non existent if its over a 50+ year span with only 5 occurrences. I would call it simply Circumstantial.

On a Humorous note.:
Here is a Marc Lawrence like Trend. LOL>
This trend has NEVER lost!
Play on any team in the Super Bowl - that was a winner in their last game, that played the prior game in a cold city location when the temperature was under 80 degrees in January, but was cold enough to snow, and had at least one caucasian QB who won the game the week before, but did or didn't cover the spread, but needs to win this game providing there is a QB that is older or younger than the other by at least 10 years, but may or not cover against the spread, while each team has a winning record against the other during the regular season, but either won or lost by 3 points or less, who won in the stats, or had more turnovers than the opponent, who could have been the home dog by almost the same spread in this upcoming game, while neither team scored over 27 points nor less than 24 but happen to be playing in the same location for the Super Bowl that the regular season game was played - but has at least one QB that is now playing in a different conference for the first time, who was expected to be washed up by his former team, which was originally in the same conference as the team he is now playing in this SB, but in different divisions, of which he beat that team last year, but actually won his new conference, Conference Championship game to get here as a underdog - in 2 of 3 prior playoff games - all on the road - but won all 3 SU.

Play on The Winner to cover the spread. (Just as a back up, play the game in the second half if it gets one sided on the scoreboard in the first half.)

mark lawrence to a T
PERFECT EXAMPLE
lmao

 

[mickj]

Here's a thought - take the five teams I listed in my first post, add the 2020 Chiefs to the mix, and see if you can figure it out yourself. Some people, like myself, actually use their brain and do their own research. Some people, like yourself, like to whine on constantly. Stop whining and start researching.

Top offensive team losing to better defense?

 

[Haystacks]

This is the game where a NE employee stayed in the stands with a camera during Ram practices.

The camera incident made it out in the public later but was smoothed over, the NFL covered it up to protect the brand. ESPN et al cooperated, let it go.

WRs Issac Bruce and Torrey Holt both were in the local paper the week after the game saying when they lined up the NE safeties were whispering the plays to the rest of the Pats defense, using exact Ram nomenclature, everything. The article was scrubbed and the great Rams WRs were told to STFU for the good of the NFL. Yes, this happened, I saw the actual article, and talked to a Ram player or three in later years.

i guess they should have had better security.....loser crybaby rams

 

[Serbone]

i guess they should have had better security.....loser crybaby rams

Go ahead, deny facts, just be an ass----.

 

[mj23]

Great pick Big Lou !!

 

[BigLouReturns]

Great pick Big Lou !!

puff_>>

 

[BigLouReturns]

1968 Colts - lost 16-7 to the NY Jets
1983 Redskins - lost 38-9 to the L.A. Raiders
1984 Dolphins - lost 38-16 to the 49ers
2001 Rams - lost 20-17 to the Patriots
2009 Colts - lost 31-17 to the Saints
2020 Chiefs - lost 31-9 to the Buccaneers

This system spots overrated teams in the Super Bowl. If you'll notice, the losing teams have averaged 12.5 ppg.

 

[BORO]

I’m glad you won. Nice job

 

[whiskers2]

Thanks for the winner Lou. The day you posted this I placed my ML bet on TB.

 

[LexingtonGambler]

6-0 cheersgif

 

[bengals34]

Big lou keep posting. Who cares about what system it is. I miss you posting ever week. About 3 or 4 years ago you were winning every week. I followed your plays every week.

 

[Serbone]

6-0 cheersgif

Did he post the first 5 games? Nope.
Therefore, if he did not reveal his "system", to see how it applied to the first 5 games, and then, Tampa Bay, this is all null and void.

 

[BigLouReturns]

Did he post the first 5 games? Nope.
Therefore, if he did not reveal his "system", to see how it applied to the first 5 games, and then, Tampa Bay, this is all null and void.

6-0.puff_>>

 

[exploited17]

6-0.puff_>>

Is it?
If you do not post the system how do we even know?
I could post every SB played and claim there is a system.
Then Bucs win and I say 55-0

 

[BigLouReturns]

Is it?
If you do not post the system how do we even know?
I could post every SB played and claim there is a system.
Then Bucs win and I say 55-0

You should stop complaining and try doing what I'm doing, which is researching and preparing for the 2021 season.

 

[cruisin]

It's always amazing to me how people want to know systems. No matter who started it, where it came from, or how it works, who cares. And people get indignant about it. The more info you put out there, the less relevant it becomes as everyone starts playing/using it. Either play the team that's posted, or move on. No one is putting a gun to your head to bet that team. Neither is anyone obligated to share any info they don't want to.

 

[exploited17]

It's always amazing to me how people want to know systems. No matter who started it, where it came from, or how it works, who cares. And people get indignant about it. The more info you put out there, the less relevant it becomes as everyone starts playing/using it. Either play the team that's posted, or move on. No one is putting a gun to your head to bet that team. Neither is anyone obligated to share any info they don't want to.

Then don't post it is a system
Just post the play

 

[Serbone]

It's always amazing to me how people want to know systems. No matter who started it, where it came from, or how it works, who cares. And people get indignant about it. The more info you put out there, the less relevant it becomes as everyone starts playing/using it. Either play the team that's posted, or move on. No one is putting a gun to your head to bet that team. Neither is anyone obligated to share any info they don't want to.

This was based upon ONLY 5 previous SB games, citing an alleged "system", going back 53 years, about one every 10 years, going back to 1968, and the previous picks obviously could not be verified by anybody, so experienced, intelligent posters here are entitled to ask the basis for the "system" before wagering. (I had TB anyway based on real information)