why is bet royal graded a d-

[Fishhead]

TOW-

SBR has fully stated why they PERSONALLY feel that ROYAL deserves a D- rating.

Now, the PLAYERS here can respect that or they cannot.

THE FACT IS, THEY HAVE GIVEN THEIR REASONING AND DO NOT THINK YOU CAN ASK FOR MUCH MORE THAN THAT.

Attack that reasoning, not something YOU THINK may be the reasons as you and Major believe.

My personal thoughts are that SBR should be respected for their ROYAL GRADE............even though myself believe it to be way TO LOW.

 

[TheMajor+]

This is a forum for the PLAYERS of the offshore world.....not a forum to attack posters at your leisure.

Thanks for your understanding.........FISH

 

[TOW]

1. Thanks for dodging the question. Mind, even at my times and before then the Bank you talk about was NEVER the operation's primary Bank. You may explain everything about affiliate deals to me but you honestly can't be so full of yourself to pretend that you, an agent, know better than people that actually ran the operation.

I shall therefore repeat my question : do other books on the Island hold their player's escrow at that Bank, yes or no ?

2. Royal never intended to stiff the guy. His initial claim went from the cancelled wagers down to his credit card refund which will be proved in Court. I guess you're the only one who sees the case here.

 

[TheMajor+]

Roberto,

I have family working at Royal Sports so of course my views on Royal are obviously slanted" Every post you make should include that line

Man this is some funny ****.

Coming from a guy that says right on the top of his site "SBR does not accpet ad money"

WSEX would differ with that blatant lie SBR. A monthly fee to spell their name right is kinda like ad money


How about this. On your top list you put this

We at SBR receive back half of the money you lose should you sign up at any book listed on the recommened list through us. We are rooting for you to lose. We have an agennda and it is to find more losers to send to books so we can get more of your money"

This crap is beyond comical

 

[TheMajor+]

Fish, why delete my post? I asked you to back up what you said?

Thats the way you back it up???????

 

[Buzzsaw]

"do other books on the Island hold their player's escrow at that Bank, yes or no ?"

What difference does that make? YES others have although Royal may be the last, I'm not sure about Oasis.

Look, Roberto (who has relatives working for Roya) I have stated why I think they are a D-. You and Russ coming out like drunken sailors screaming, throwing dirt and crap, old web sites, bets and whatever.

I have not heard one good reason from either of you why Royal should be rated higher than D-. Do you have one?

 

[TOW]

Fish, given you're a good person I trust you will immediately delete all undue references to my friends and relatives contained in SBR's posts which happen to be a distasteful personal attack. Thank you.

 

[TOW]

Yes John,

As Ken and other posters have previously mentioned in this thread Royal has shown tangible signs of improvements over these recent months. This is why I agree with posters who rate Royal between C and C-.

As far as your other comments...well, gotta check your keyboard first buddy. Can't blame others if they play Texan with you when you play Texan with them first.

 

[Fishhead]

Fish, why delete my post? I asked you to back up what you said?

Thats the way you back it up???????

I thought you said you just recently got a NETELLER account............if you didnt, I will edit my above post.

 

[TheGeneral+]

Same ol' song and dance here.

Good for the Rubber Room.

 

[Fishhead]

Fish, given you're a good person I trust you will immediately delete all undue references to my friends and relatives contained in SBR's posts which happen to be a distasteful personal attack. Thank you.

Edited

 

[THE SHRINK]

John,

When I see a sports book rated a D-, it tells me that the sports book is on the VERGE OF FAILING. Just as when I was in Grade School, a D- meant the same thing even though that was many fortnights ago for an old man like me...

If anything, ROYAL SPORTS has PROVEN over the past FIVE months that they are NOT on the verge of FAILING, all gamblers have been paid in a timely manner, hence I believe your grade needs to be changed to reflect this fact...

THE SHRINK

 

[Fishhead]

FOR GODSAKES, UPGRADE THE DAMN GRADE TO A D+/C- ........OR WHATEVER......... AND MAKE EVERYBODY HAPPY.

WOW, WHAT A LOT OF HOOPLA OVER A LITTLE LETTER GRADE!

 

[TheMajor+]

It is the complete bullshit around the grade Fish. Royals viabilty has zero to do with SBR's rating.

Just like Jazz' viability had zero to do with SBR posting they were "closing" when they were not.

That is what upsets most people.

 

[Fishhead]

I betcha all HECK WOULD BREAK loose if SBR were to lower their grade on ROYAL to the dreaded........

F+

I wish they had F+'s at the Univ. of Iowa.............I at least would have passed a couple courses that I flunked and had to re-take. :WTF:

 

[TOW]

OK, since my kind request has gone unattended...

SBR, please refrain from rating eight books ( six of which on your recommended list ) to which you provide professional and marketing services to since your rating may not be objective.

Out of respect for those operations I will not mention their names.

Thanks.

 

[TheMajor+]

I betcha all HECK WOULD BREAK loose if SBR were to lower their grade on ROYAL to the dreaded........

F+

I wish they had F+'s at the Univ. of Iowa.............I at least would have passed a couple courses that I flunked and had to re-take. :WTF:

And if we hear one more of these Royal warnings at SBR over a credit card scammer I think people are going to vomit.

GL in the game tonight.

 

[Buzzsaw]

Russ’s psychotic incoherent babble is quite entertaining but lite on substance. Where is his post on why Royal should be rated higher than D- ?? I guess he agrees D- is about right.

<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-comfficeffice" /><o> </o>

Roberto I can’t imagine you giving a fair grade to a sportsbook that you have family working at. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out that’s just not right.

<o> </o>

Ken, point well taken. D- could be too low, let’s see how Royal does from here. Let’s see if they can at least make it 9 months to a year without falling back into slow-pay mode. You have taken them down from the Rx twice in the past year. That's serious, plus books don't magically get unbroke and healthy overnight.

We try hard to let the book make their own rating and then we just report it.

 

[TOW]

John,

Royal is a C today. Period. Please refrain from stirring up ****. You'll soon be proven wrong ( again ), whereas you should honestly refrain from rating books you actually work for as marketer....afterall that's how you guys answer the phone..."SBR Marketing".

 

[Fishhead]

John,

Royal is a C today. Period. Please refrain from stirring up ****. You'll soon be proven wrong ( again ), whereas you should honestly refrain from rating books you actually work for as marketer....afterall that's how you guys answer the phone..."SBR Marketing".

TOW-

I thought you were a 1-10 man, not an A-F kinda guy?

OH, THE INSANITY OF IT ALL!!

:tongue: :tongue: