Tracking "Number of Innings in which a Run is Scored In" SYSTEM

[JerseyShop101]

DAY 8
June 17th Plays:

ATL/CINN UNDER 8.5 -105
SEA/SD UNDER 8 -120
OAK/LOS UNDER 7.5 -105

LA ANGELS/SF OVER 7.5 -115

NYY (15%) -205
LA ANGELS (10%) +151
SEATTLE (8%) +105

I'm only playing these 7 plays. Staying away from the Overs where the line was 9.5 or higher.

Good luck guys and don't forget that the Angels game is an afternoon game, I luv that plus money!

:toast:

YTD (7 DAYS)
UNDERS 18-7-1 72% +10.45
OVERS where line is 9 or less 11-2-1 85% +8.80
OVERS where line is 9.5 or higher 2-8-1 20% -6.55
OVERS where the line is 9.5 or higher FADE PLAY 0-2 0% -2.05
9% and Up Plays 15-2 88% +13.94
6% and Up Plays 17-5 77% +11.59
Overall 49-24-2 67% +23.24

 

[smallbluedonkey]

Thanks for posting. Here's hoping for a 7-0 day!!

 

[Green17]

A Sincere Thank You

Jersey,

Just wanted to thank you for sharing all of your work with us on this thread. I realize how much consistent time and effort it requires as well as the consideration on your part to share your work with us. Not everyone would be so kind.

You are appreciated.

 

[RDC-3]

we got screwed on 3 of those unders losing late in their respective games. But we did get lucky on the Toronto over. Anyways, it shows me that you are on the right track with this system and thanks again for bringing it to the RX.

 

[CarolinaJ.E.D]

Thanks for your HELP@):toast:

 

[RDC-3]

found a way to maximize your profits if u play the 1st half on the totals (unders)when the # is between 7 and 8 1/2 for the game>>>>the record is 9-3 and if u just play the game wth those #s ur rec. would be 9-3 as well. For some reason when the total is 9 or more the rec. is only 5-4 and the 1st half would be 3-6.

as for the overs>>>>> using a closing # of 9 or less for the game u would be 9-0 and the 1st half is 8-2........................I know its very premature but i wil keep an eye on this and keep u posted.

 

[JerseyShop101]

Sound good RDC-3

Thanks for the kind words Green17 and guys.

I really like the Angels and the Over a lot! Angels are at 39% scoring in the last 12 days, Today is a bad day for Lincecum and the moneyline is really good! We are starting at 2-0 today with this game!

:toast:

 

[sparticus]

Thanks for all u do JS101,GL

 

[Michelangelo]

Nice big dog Halo starter JS.

Keep on rollin'.

 

[abc]

Sheesh, NY is playing like garbage. Hope they can turn it around. Tough loss on the under for the Angels game. The big underdog win helped though. Positive so far.

 

[abc]

Bottom of the 9th. Yankees need 2. They just got a homer, so they need 1 now to tie. Come onnnnn Yankees.

 

[abc]

Yankees leave a man on 3rd at the end of the game. They had a man on 3rd and 1st with only 1 out, but after 6 foul balls, he hit into a double play. Thought they were going to come back and win for sure. What really sucks is that the man on 3rd had stolen both second and third. Oh well, hopefully the night rounds out nicely.

 

[abc]

I just realized you didn't take the Under 10 in the Baltimore/Mets game. The Mets are 0.26 and the Orioles are 0.21. The under was 10. The game pushed, but I was just curious why you didn't take this bet alongside the others.

EDIT: 2-2 so far with a big underdog win thrown in there. Looking good. I'm waiting on a couple of those large over games to finish to see how those did for the day. I didn't bet them, but I'm gonna keep tracking to see if there's any money to be made either playing or fading them.

 

[STACKSONDECK]

I just realized you didn't take the Under 10 in the Baltimore/Mets game. The Mets are 0.26 and the Orioles are 0.21. The under was 10. The game pushed, but I was just curious why you didn't take this bet alongside the others.

EDIT: 2-2 so far with a big underdog win thrown in there. Looking good. I'm waiting on a couple of those large over games to finish to see how those did for the day. I didn't bet them, but I'm gonna keep tracking to see if there's any money to be made either playing or fading them.

but the yanks took away that dog profit right. you guys playing moneylines or runlines on the big chalk?

 

[abc]

The overs that were 10 and up were 1-2. I'm waiting on the COL/TB game. The over was 9.5, which didn't fit your criteria, but they were the top two on the list so I bet them anyways.

 

[abc]

but the yanks took away that dog profit right. you guys playing moneylines or runlines on the big chalk?

We're playing MLs and O/Us. As far as I know, all bets were 1 unit. I bet all of them the same, but I don't know if Jersey did the same. I think he said all were for 1 unit. He's still testing this and I'm pretty sure he said he was betting 1 unit each because of it. Most of the success has come from Over/Unders anyways.

 

[abc]

I really like the Angels and the Over a lot! Angels are at 39% scoring in the last 12 days, Today is a bad day for Lincecum and the moneyline is really good! We are starting at 2-0 today with this game!

Did you take out some data from your data set? I have the Angels at 36% scoring, but I may be using a different set of data. I thought your data was from June 1st onwards.

 

[JerseyShop101]

Did you take out some data from your data set? I have the Angels at 36% scoring, but I may be using a different set of data. I thought your data was from June 1st onwards.

Its 36% from 1 June, was working on a recurring last 12 days only stats spreadsheet, Angels were at the top at 39%.
I had this for Bat from 1 June, which is why I didn't have it as an under play.
<TABLE style="WIDTH: 240pt; BORDER-COLLAPSE: collapse" cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=320 border=0 x:str><COLGROUP><COL style="WIDTH: 60pt" span=4 width=80><TBODY><TR style="HEIGHT: 13.5pt" height=18><TD class=xl25 id=td_post_1947825 style="BORDER-RIGHT: windowtext 0.5pt solid; BORDER-TOP: windowtext 0.5pt solid; BORDER-LEFT: windowtext 0.5pt solid; WIDTH: 60pt; BORDER-BOTTOM: windowtext 0.5pt solid; HEIGHT: 13.5pt; BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" width=80 height=18>BAL</TD><TD class=xl26 style="BORDER-RIGHT: windowtext 0.5pt solid; BORDER-TOP: windowtext 0.5pt solid; BORDER-LEFT: windowtext; WIDTH: 60pt; BORDER-BOTTOM: windowtext 0.5pt solid; BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" width=80 x:num>27</TD><TD class=xl26 style="BORDER-RIGHT: windowtext 0.5pt solid; BORDER-TOP: windowtext 0.5pt solid; BORDER-LEFT: windowtext; WIDTH: 60pt; BORDER-BOTTOM: windowtext 0.5pt solid; BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" width=80 x:num>114</TD><TD class=xl24 style="BORDER-RIGHT: windowtext 0.5pt solid; BORDER-TOP: windowtext 0.5pt solid; BORDER-LEFT: windowtext; WIDTH: 60pt; BORDER-BOTTOM: windowtext 0.5pt solid; BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" align=right width=80 x:num="0.23684210526315788" x:fmla="=SUM(B1/C1)">0.24 </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

I hope we edge out a profit tonight.

 

[abc]

Hmmm, I wonder why I have 24/114 for Baltimore. I must have missed a game on accident. Oh well.

EDIT: Might want to recheck your numbers. Looking at the data you had at the end of June 15th, it was 22/105, then they scored in 2 innings out of 9 on the 16th. That's why I have them at 24/114 equaling 0.21.

 

[STACKSONDECK]

We're playing MLs and O/Us. As far as I know, all bets were 1 unit. I bet all of them the same, but I don't know if Jersey did the same. I think he said all were for 1 unit. He's still testing this and I'm pretty sure he said he was betting 1 unit each because of it. Most of the success has come from Over/Unders anyways.

oh okay... the mls are hitting high also just a smaller amount of plays.