I love these type of threads..... What people dont understand is that the Pats are rebuilding on the fly while other teams take a few years and top draft picks to do it. How many teams would take a 19-5 regular season record over the last 24 games during rebuilding years? They have one player on defense still on the roster from the 2007 team....
damn, forgot about this thread
yep, the Pats really do suck this year, great calls
as for cheating, 64-19 since spygate
I appreciate the haters though, making it possible to go 8-5-1 ATS and 4-1-1 ATS since their last SU loss
yep, the Pats really do suck this year, great calls
as for cheating, 64-19 since spygate
I appreciate the haters though, making it possible to go 8-5-1 ATS and 4-1-1 ATS since their last SU loss
From the NFL's Constitution & Bylaws (article 9): "Any use by any club at any time, from the start to the finish of any game in which such club is a participant, of any communications or information-gathering equipment, other than Polaroid-type cameras or field telephones, shall be prohibited, including without limitation videotape machines, telephone tapping, or bugging devices, or any other form of electronic devices that might aid a team during the playing of a game."
Irrelevent ! This present Patriot team is a complete re-do from those Championship teams. How many players are still playing from those great teams ? While other franchises take years to rebuild, the Patriots go 13-3 in a rebuilding year. Awesome accomplishment if you want my opinion ... and of course I'm sure you don't but I'm giving it to you anyway !
What's the problem ? You seem to like avoiding questions that you have no answers for. Comparing two different teams playoffs records is of course irrelevent unless you actually think they are exactly the same teams.
BTW Is you answer for everything homerism or is your memory just that poor. Just yesterday you accused me of being a Packer homer. Now I'm a Patriots homer. Tomorrow I guess I'll be a Raider Homer right ?
hno:
2-3, lost the SB on the most fortuitous play in super bowl history
and I guess that somehow mitigates the fact that they have won more games than anybody else, LMFAO
they probably covered more games than anybody too
"can't wait"
No idea what teams you are talking about. I am talking about the patriots and their merits. Saying their postseason record doesnt mean anything is laughable. After someone quotes their regular season record. Which means more - postseason wins or regular season wins?
BTW Is you answer for everything homerism or is your memory just that poor. Just yesterday you accused me of being a Packer homer. Now I'm a Patriots homer. Tomorrow I guess I'll be a Raider Homer right ?
Oh yeah, you're the belligerent guy from the Packers thread who followed me over here. Tight life you (removed personal attack)
Last edited by a moderator:
I thought we were talking about playoff games?
They haven't won a playoff game since going 18-1.
They haven't won any playoff games and they were huge favorites in all of those IIRC. Ravens, Jets in Foxboro come to mind. "Covered more games than anybody too"
But I guess regular season success is enough for a Pats fan.
so you're talking about 3 years and two appearances in playoff games, with Brady missing 1 of those seasons and rehabbing a 2nd. They were a mediocre 10-6 during his rehab year, with no expectations of advancing far.
so essentially your argument is because the Jets upset the Patriots in the playoffs last year, that proves they have to cheat to succeed, everything else be damned. OK, whatever
I'll be here in January
so who was just talking about the post season? maybe you were
so I guess the regular season must be ignored by a Pats hater, for obvious reasons
the reason you only "recall" two games is because there were only two games
do you really think -3 makes you a huge favorite?
