Scott won despite his putter. sure he made a couple in the clutch , but overall its a liability for him.. to answer the qustion, no he wouldn't have won..once the weekend approached Tiger startede missing fairways, greens, and putts...
i dont know why people are assuming he would have made birdie if that shot doesnt hit the flag. The shot would have landed past the pin (since it hit the stick on the fly) and would have taken a decent bounce. I saw alot of shots on Friday take a big bounce and end up in the fringe, which was relatively close. He landed his second attempt 6 or so feet short of the flag and after its initial big bounce it stopped dead. Thinking that he would have had a tap in had he not hit the pin is a guess.
Top five
Then why did you wager on him in the third round?
It is sad that people have to bring down the number one player in the World....or anybody in any profession that exuberates greatness...there will always be haters....he gets a two stroke penalty that equates to a triple bogey on the hole and still finishes top 5 in the field...he was striking the ball just as well as anyone in the field...and putting better than most...Red Eye must have been watching a different tournament...
Scott won despite his putter. sure he made a couple in the clutch , but overall its a liability for him.. to answer the qustion, no he wouldn't have won..once the weekend approached Tiger startede missing fairways, greens, and putts...
It is sad that people have to bring down the number one player in the World....or anybody in any profession that exuberates greatness...there will always be haters....he gets a two stroke penalty that equates to a triple bogey on the hole and still finishes top 5 in the field...he was striking the ball just as well as anyone in the field...and putting better than most...Red Eye must have been watching a different tournament...
Viejo...Tiger is a favorite because the public makes him the favorite, his game has improved this year but not like it was 5 years ago and you are correct, none of us are as good, Tigers issue is that the players are not as scared of him as they were in the past, because his game is not what it was.......
I understood your answer. It was the question within the answer that didn't make sense. Everyone thinks that Tigers game has diminished so much is the reason he doesn't dominate anymore when in reality it's more about the other players stepping up their games and getting to the point where Tiger can't dominate like he did years ago. Adam Scott is a much better and more experienced player now than he was 10 years ago when he was one of the new young guns on your. How many heard of Dufner or McDowell 10 years ago? It's just as much about the other players getting better if not more than the fact Tiger isn't as good as he was.Think you misunderstood my answer...Tiger is still good but he dominated his early years....nobody will ever dominate like that again....
I agree 100%. I've been fortunate to see both Jack and Tiger play in my lifetime and enjoyed watching them both. Whether Tiger equals or breaks Jacks majors record remains to be seen but I sure hope he at least gets to 17 and challenges it because it would be great for the game of golf.Isn't Tiger #1 today? Outside of winning, didn't he still place higher than any other "big guns" of the world? Don't understand all the Tiger hate. Enjoy watching the best we will ever see in our lifetime.....no need to let it pass you by.....like the guy or not.
Isn't Tiger #1 today? Outside of winning, didn't he still place higher than any other "big guns" of the world? Don't understand all the Tiger hate. Enjoy watching the best we will ever see in our lifetime.....no need to let it pass you by.....like the guy or not.
looks like your joining the VD & Taylor fan club.. Again I will repeat this one more time, only because your a good poster Albatross.. Just because us so called haters aren't on all fours for Tiger doesn't mean we hate.. Personally I don't hate anything, not even my 3 ex wives.... There is no hate in my posts.. Just because I don't think he would have won this week, mostly because he hasn't proven he can on championship courses the last few years, doesn't mean I hate him.. Just because I don't put him in front of Jack doesn't mean I hate Tiger.. Just because I think he is just the greatest front runner of all time doesn't mean I hate Tiger.. I just tell it like it is from my point of view and that offends the Tiger apologists in here..I do respect his game and what he has accomplished.. Do I respect him as a person, no.. Thats why I root for other golfers that I respect and like.. Doesn't make me a hater..
Everyone would have bet the max that he would not WD if such a bet was out there. Why would he WD? And if he had been questioned about the drop before he signed his card he would have said exactly what he said in his interview and been penalized 2 strokes and that would have been it.Kudos .
for most of his diehard fans his golfing greatness grants immunity from scrutiny . Attack him? u hate him.Like you , I believe he's a fantastic golfing talent . Don't care for him at all- character unacceptable , sad for an elite sporting figure.
I would have bet the max that he'd not withdraw .Let me leave u with this query- if he was notified prior to signing his card that they would review his drop further would he have mentioned his faux pax during the interview ? .....um, Mr.woods, slip of the tongue ?......sir, u don't know the rules ?.....he's NO Bobby Jones, fair ?
He obviously did not know the rule. You think all golfers know all the rules?
looks like your joining the VD & Taylor fan club.. Again I will repeat this one more time, only because your a good poster Albatross.. Just because us so called haters aren't on all fours for Tiger doesn't mean we hate.. Personally I don't hate anything, not even my 3 ex wives.... There is no hate in my posts.. Just because I don't think he would have won this week, mostly because he hasn't proven he can on championship courses the last few years, doesn't mean I hate him.. Just because I don't put him in front of Jack doesn't mean I hate Tiger.. Just because I think he is just the greatest front runner of all time doesn't mean I hate Tiger.. I just tell it like it is from my point of view and that offends the Tiger apologists in here..I do respect his game and what he has accomplished.. Do I respect him as a person, no.. Thats why I root for other golfers that I respect and like.. Doesn't make me a hater..