Pennsylvania lawmakers want sports betting in time for NFL season

Search

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
18,959
Tokens
https://www.google.com/amp/www.phil...-pennsylvania-new-jersey-delaware-latest/amp/


Don’t bet the house on legal sports betting in Pennsylvania



A few weeks ago, shortly after he flew into Philadelphia from Las Vegas, Joe Asher was standing in an area Wawa waiting for his hoagie to be made, wearing a long-sleeve Las Vegas Golden Knights t-shirt. Noticing the out-of-town attire, a Wawa delivery driver struck up a conversation about Vegas with Asher, a former Wilmington, Delaware resident and University of Delaware grad.


The driver had no idea what Asher did for a living.

“Are you a Golden Knights’ fan?” the driver asked. “Are you from Vegas?”

Asher explained that he lives in Vegas now, but he’s originally from this area of the country. Then the driver asked Asher, “What do people out in Vegas think about sports betting coming to Pennsylvania?”


The pair chatted for 10 minutes, with the driver explaining how he used to bet with a bookie, before Asher picked up his sandwich for the trek to Atlantic City. But what the driver didn’t know is that the man he was just chatting up is actually the CEO of William Hill US, the U.S. arm of the powerful British bookmaking giant William Hill.

What the driver also didn’t know is that he may not be placing a legal bet any time soon in Pennsylvania.

* * *

After the U.S. Supreme Court legalized sports betting on Monday, May 14, in the ruling Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, No. 16-476, there were eight states — New Jersey, Connecticut, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Iowa, New York, Mississippi and West Virginia — that had a head start, with laws prepared to make sports betting legal. Thirteen other states — California, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Michigan, Missouri, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South Carolina — have plans or proposals to consider legalizing sports betting in place.

For sports fans looking to place a wager or two in Delaware or New Jersey, this is a good thing — starting this week. For the poor truck driver in Pennsylvania, however, it looks like he’ll have to cross state lines to place a legal bet — or continue business with his bookie.

Under federal law, legal sports books pay a 25-percent point of the amount wagered, which translates into about five percent of the revenue every month, according to Asher. That federal tax is across the board. In Nevada, the state tax for sports betting, which is a sliding scale, is roughly six percent of monthly revenue, which amounts to roughly 11 percent total (including federal taxes). In New Jersey, the monthly retail level state tax is expected to be less than 10 percent, with the online tax possibly slightly higher. Coupled with the five percent tax to the feds, the total government take comes out to roughly 15 to 16 percent.

In Pennsylvania, however, the monthly tax is expected to be an astronomical 36 percent at the state and local level — 34 percent to the state and two percent to local municipalities. Add in the federal tax and it totals a whopping 41 percent.


But that's only part of it.

Pennsylvania is also charging a $10 million licensing fee — for the privilege of paying 41-percent, as spelled out in Act 41, which was passed by the Pennsylvania State Legislature in October 2017 in anticipation of the U.S. Supreme Court legalizing sports wagering.

* * *

So, is there any chance this works?

“The problem is that it makes it very hard for the legal market to compete with the black market, to compete with the illegal bookies in Pennsylvania,” Asher explained. “Sports betting is widespread in the area. I know it because I grew up around it. My dad used to bet with his local bookie ‘Tony Franacas,’ who had a little place on 8th and Orange Street in Wilmington, Delaware. You have this well-entrenched and established illegal market in Pennsylvania.

“Clearly, we want to try and migrate people away from that, but I can’t see how you can realistically do that, given the tax structure. Because here’s what’s going to happen: The Tony Franacases of the world are going to say to say to guys like my dad, ‘Listen Larry, don’t worry about betting at the casino, I’m going to give you a 25 percent rebate on all of your losses at the end of the year. So if you lose money, we’ll give you 25 percent back.’ If a bookie does that, he still has a 16-percent percentage-point advantage over us. He’s not playing the $10 million up front, he doesn’t have all of the infrastructure costs that we do.


“That’s the real challenge in Pennsylvania. We want to move people off the black market, because that doesn’t do anybody any good. It doesn’t protect costumers, it doesn’t create jobs and it doesn’t generate tax revenue. The problem of course is the tax rate. It’s not the sexiest thing to talk about, but it’s fundamentally important to our business.”

William Hill US, which has 107 locations and is far and away No. 1 in the Las Vegas market, will be opening a sports book in Monmouth Park racetrack in New Jersey. On June 28, it will be opening another at the Ocean Casino in Atlantic City. And it's already the the risk manager for the Delaware Lottery.

But one of the things William Hill US hasn’t done yet is to make any steps towards opening a book in Pennsylvania —because of the tax rate and licensing fee.

In Las Vegas, the licensing fee is $500. That's a cool $9,999,500 less than it will be in Pennsylvania. In New Jersey, Asher predicts the licensing fee won’t come anywhere close to $10 million, which presents a further problem for sports books looking to open in the Keystone State.

“It’s a problem, a real problem,” Asher said. “In New York, I’m hearing it’s going to be around 10 percent, or less. And that’s New York. Then, you have five percent to the IRS. Every other state — West Virginia, Mississippi, it’s around 10-percent. Pennsylvania is the outlier, and understand that Pennsylvania has a high casino tax rate. This is different, because you don’t have underground casinos. What you do have are illegal bookies.

“The legal market in Pennsylvania could be very small — smaller than it should be — because of this tax rate. Someone will pay the money, but it will be a small business compared to what it could be, because it will be very hard to compete with the bookie. Right now, as we’re talking, you don’t hear a whole lot about Pennsylvania, and that’s because of the structural challenge involving the taxes.”

Instead, much of the focus has been on New Jersey, which has been at the vanguard in the push toward legalizing sports betting nationwide.

* * *

In 2011, New Jersey voters passed a constitutional amendment in favor of legalizing sports betting. Three years later, the Legislature repealed its law against sports betting. Both were challenged in court. But now the Legislature only has to pass a law establishing the rules and regulations for sanctioned sports betting to begin at casinos and racetracks in the state.

After six years of litigation, and seven losses in the lower courts, New Jersey struck the one major decision that mattered — in the U.S. Supreme Court. Asher said William Hill US is plunging millions into their sports book operations in New Jersey, a market Asher predicts could be twice as large as Nevada’s, which saw $5 billion in legal sports betting last year, according to UNLV’s Center for Gaming Research.

Americans illegally wager $150 billion on sports each year, according to the American Gaming Association estimates, and 32 states are expected to jump into the legal game within the first five years.

“It’s killing me not to do something in Pennsylvania, because, look, I grew up in the area, I love the state and Philadelphia, and I’m a lifelong Eagles and Phillies’ fan,” Asher said. “I can guarantee you Tony Franacas, who if he was alive, would be 120 right now, wouldn’t be paying $10-million for a licensing fee, I can tell you that.

“You just hope that someone in Pennsylvania is listening, because the only time I’m spending in Pennsylvania right now is flying in from Vegas, going to the Wawa and driving over to Jersey.”
 

Dain Bramaged
Joined
Mar 21, 2008
Messages
16,003
Tokens
Leave it to this pitiful state to fk it up. This state is run by complete idiots.

Time to move :103631605
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
18,959
Tokens
Leave it to this pitiful state to fk it up. This state is run by complete idiots.

Time to move :103631605

Yeah, very frustrating how they screwed it up.......they won't put any sports betting in mini casinos tho. They want to put it in the 12 casinos, & the OTB's.......but let's see what happens with the retarded $10 million license fee & 34% tax rate, they need to be lowered down.

Pa will be a laughing stock if they are not up & running by Oct.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
12,044
Tokens
No way this works in PA

I remember some locals the posted here and the local lines were always 4-5 points better then you could get anywhere

why would you give up a PA local to play in a casino




This whole post is is a farce,i have never seen a local 4-5 points different than a casino,PA locals are all about money, so there's no way any of them would give that type of lines
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
19,217
Tokens
This whole post is is a farce,i have never seen a local 4-5 points different than a casino,PA locals are all about money, so there's no way any of them would give that type of lines

True but we had 2 posters here that would say that with stupid lines they posted and count them in their records but they still usually lost even with made up lines
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
18,959
Tokens
https://www.paonlinecasino.com/2704/no-sports-betting-applicants-pa/



Thin margins and high fees; they could be the death of sports betting in Pennsylvania.


On May 31, the state released its temporary sports betting regulations and the following day the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board (PGCB) started accepting petitions for sports betting from the existing 12 casinos and one casino to come.


Nobody submitted a petition and while it’s hard to say exactly what’s keeping casinos from applying, they may have 10 million reasons why.


High fees could be deterring casinos
Per the state’s sports betting legislation, casinos must pay $10 million and complete an application in order to secure a sports betting license. Once their sportsbooks are up and running, the state will take another 36 percent of each casino’s revenue.


Pennsylvania is, historically speaking, a tax-heavy state. Casinos pay a 54 percent tax on their casino revenue. The revenue money is split four different ways:

State tax: 34%

PA race horse development fund: 12%

Economic development and tourism fund: 5%

Local share assessment: 4%


When it comes to sports betting, Pennsylvania will charge a 36% tax on gambling revenue.

This is significant considering that margins are already thin for sports books and Nevada and New Jersey have significantly lower tax rates on sports-betting revenue.


36% tax is steep based on revenue
Nevada sportsbooks have a historic win of around 4.5 percent. While it’s hard to predict how much money sports betting in PA will bring, we can theorize that the average win will be similar to Nevada.


A 36 percent state tax on a 4.5 percent win would drop that win down to 2.8 percent. In terms of dollars, that’s the difference between, say $100 million in revenue and $64 million.


36% tax is steep based on other states’ rates
Aside from the implications, a 36 percent tax has on overall revenue numbers for PA sports books, there’s the issue of other states’ rates.


Nevada charges a 5 percent tax while New Jersey’s tax is scheduled to be 8 percent. The PA sportsbook tax is more than seven times higher than Nevada and more than quadruple New Jersey’s rate.


Comparing satellite casino fees to sports betting fees
Another aspect of the PA gambling expansion was satellite casinos (“Category 4 casinos”). Licenses for these casinos require a minimum of a $7.5 million bid in the PGCB’s auctions.


While the first two licenses went for more than $90 million combined, the past two have dipped below $10 million each, which leads to the question: Why are casinos hesitant to submit sports-betting petitions for $10 million when satellite casinos licenses are just a few million cheaper, have higher tax rates, and require funding for construction and all the expenses related to building a new facility?


The issue may be projected revenue. Satellites will most likely bring in more revenue than sportsbooks.


It seems as though the casinos believe this is the case, as five satellite licenses are off the board with just five remaining. Meanwhile, at the time of publishing, no sports-betting petitions had been filed.
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
18,959
Tokens
https://www.google.com/amp/s/articles.pennlive.com/news/2018/06/thats_two_by_thursday_morning.amp




At 10:30 this morning, New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy is scheduled to place a bet at Monmouth Park, a horse track near the shore in Oceanport, and The Garden State will celebrate making its "dream of legalized sports betting" a reality.

Thirty minutes later and about 70 miles to the south, Atlantic City's Borgata casino will start taking sports bets.


Delaware's been taking action on everything from playoff hockey and Major League Baseball to boxing, NASCAR races and WNBA games since June 5, when its governor, John Carney, announced via Twitter that he'd just bet $10 on the Philadelphia Phillies.

So, as Doylestown native Pink asked in song earlier this year, "What about us?"

Be patient, pal.

The Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board is hard at work on temporary regulations to give form and substance to sports wagering here, and officials have thus far refused to set out any kind of public timeline.

If that seems like moving in slow-motion, it's really just because of our proximity to two states that have had a long head start in preparing for this moment and were well-positioned to strike first after the U.S. Supreme Court struck down federal prohibitions in place since 1992 in a May 14 ruling.

New Jersey, remember, under then-Gov. Chris Christie, passed sports gambling in 2012, and became the litigant/state battling for the sports fan's right to bet in the courts.

More than any other state, this was their win.

Delaware, meanwhile, was able to jump in fast for two reasons: It literally has had a full set of sports betting regulations in place since 2009, when an earlier sports betting initiative there was ultimately blocked by the courts.

And second, all casino gambling there occurs under the control of the Delaware Lottery, which means, in this case, that there's no casino-by-casino licensing or applications needed.

The Lottery there had also already contracted with oddsmaker William Hill for the multi-game bets - known as parlays - it has already been taking on pro football. Wiliam Hill is now creating the singular set of odds used at all three of the state's casinos.

So, special circumstances and fast tracks.

For the rest of the states with commercial gambling, the next big target is getting up and running for the 2018 football season.

Some in Harrisburg swear privately that gaming regulators here have a goal to see Pennsylvania's casinos authorized to take in-person bets by the start of football season, with online wagering permitted further down the road.

PGCB spokesman Richard McGarvey would not confirm that to PennLive this week, saying only:

"The Board will have a better idea about a timetable to launch sports betting once work on temporary regulations has advanced more, and when casinos petition the board to offer sports wagering.

"We intend to move as quickly as possible, but at the same time remember that our role is to protect the public."

In the meantime, the waiting period is giving casinos - who are asked to put up $10 million for a sports betting certificate - the chance to test the waters on a late-spring push to reduce Pennsylvania's statutory 34 percent tax on sports betting proceeds.

"There's no secret that we believe the tax rate is too high and we would like to see it lowered," said Steve Crawford, whose Wojdak Associates firm lobbies for three of Pennsylvania's 12 casinos.

Pointing to New Jersey's tax rates of 8.5 percent for in-person bets and 13 percent for online bets, the argument is that Pennsylvania's rate should be at or closer to the 16 percent tax assessed on table game winnings.

But it's not clear just yet whether all the casinos are speaking with one voice on the tax rate.

And it's even less clear that the state legislative leaders are willing to reopen the Rubik's Cube that is the state's gambling law after spending massive time and energy on an expansion bill last year.

Some are inclined to wait and see how the sports wagering market plays out through the summer months, knowing that if all the casinos sit out the tax rate could quickly be adjusted in the fall session weeks.

"Let's get the rules and regulations done and see who applies first," said Sen. Robert Tomlinson, R-Bucks County, and one of the fathers of Pennsylvania's 2004 casino gambling bill.

Keep in mind, at whatever tax rate, sports betting is not expected to produce a ton of profits for the casinos or revenue for the state.

But casino operators do want to be in it because of the potentially large new audience it attracts. For much the same reason, the state doesn't want to see that audience travelling to New Jersey, Delaware or West Virginia.

It's a question to watch between now and the summer recess.

As for our other gambling state neighbors...

West Virginia:

Much like Pennsylvania, the Mountaineer State pre-passed legislation authorizing sports betting and is deep in the throes of writing its rules and regulations.

It has stated a public goal to launch by the start of football season.

"While football season may be an ambitious goal, we have had the best and brightest working in West Virginia and they continue to be part of that process," Danielle Boyd, general counsel of the West Virginia Lottery, said in an interview last week with the news site MetroNews.

New York:

Legislation to authorize sports betting in New York is before the state legislature, but news reports there suggest its fate is unclear with about one week of session time before a scheduled summer recess.

The bill would authorize sports betting at the state's four commercial casinos, and allow the participation of other gaming entities, including horse tracks and tribal casinos, through partnerships with the casinos.

If the legislature does get a bill to Gov. Andrew Cuomo, however, some believe the New York would try to fast-track regulations to get betting windows open within weeks, rather than months.

Ohio:

PennLive's sister site Cleveland.com reported Tuesday it's still unclear when sports wagering will come to Ohio, where the first of four commercial casinos opened in Cleveland in 2012, and seven racetrack casinos soon followed throughout the state.

Both the Ohio Lottery Commission, which oversees the racinos, and lawmakers seem to believe they have the legal authority to advance plans to bring sports betting to life here.

But Lottery Commission members have suggested they won't act without direction from Gov. John Kasich, and his office has not made gambling expansion a top priority.

State lawmakers, meanwhile, are still stuck on issues like whether to confine sports betting to the existing casinos, or to perhaps open it up to sports bars, restaurants, private clubs and even other lottery outlets.

For the time being, then, it appears that Ohio is on a slower track.

Maryland:

Maryland appears to be lagging the rest of the group.

Changes to Maryland gambling laws require a state constitutional amendment with ratification by voters in a general election.

The state's General Assembly didn't approve legislation to put such a meaure on the November ballot during its most recent session - which ended in April, before the Supreme Court's decision.

So barring a special legislative session, the earliest Maryland voters might consider such an amendment is November 2020.
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
18,959
Tokens
If Pa can get their act together & be up & running by football season, they will get Maryland bettors for the next 4 years
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
18,959
Tokens
http://www.dailyitem.com/pennsylvan...cle_a4e911d2-f2c7-586c-a05e-971296e2b7a1.html



HARRISBURG – The Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board approved new temporary rules Wednesday as the state moves to open the door for sports wagering.

The Board approved rules to require casinos that offer sports betting to hire third-party monitors to ensure the integrity of their sports wagering.

Douglas Harbach, a Gaming Control Board spokesman, said these third-party integrity monitors are common in other places, including Europe and Nevada, where sports betting has been in place for years.

The Gaming Control Board has been establishing new rules for setting up sports betting under a 2017 state gaming expansion law that allowed for sports wagering if legalized by the U.S. Supreme Court. The Supreme Court opened the door sports to betting in a May 14 decision. Since then, New Jersey and Delaware have both gotten sports betting up and running.

Harbach said there is no firm timeline for doing the same in Pennsylvania, but Wednesday’s meeting “pushed the ball down the field.” He added that the Board could release its rule spelling out what kinds of sports contests will be open for legal for betting as soon as next month.

In a letter to the Gaming Control Board, Penn State President Eric Barron asked that college sports be excluded from the state’s sports wagering expansion at least during the first two years. Barron said amateur athletes may be more prone to fall under the influence of those trying to manipulate the results of sporting events.


Pro athletes are paid “annual salaries plus incentives tied to individual and team performance. The absence of financial compensation for amateur athletes creates an opportunity for inappropriate influence,” Barron wrote.

University of Pittsburgh Athletic Director Heather Lykes stopped short of asking for a college sports betting ban. She called for “impact fees” to be passed along to the colleges to cover their increased costs tied to managing the changed landscape due to pressures from sports betting.

Professional sports leagues have also been lobbying for states to enact similar so-called “integrity fees,” Harbach said. These fees would be passed along to the pro sports leagues to offset their costs in trying to combat cheating.
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
18,959
Tokens
https://www.google.com/amp/www.mcal...otball-sports-betting-20180627-story,amp.html



Penn State proposes 2-year halt to college sports betting in Pennsylvania


Before Pennsylvanians begin betting legally on sports, two of the state’s largest universities and a professional baseball team have a question: What’s our cut?

In letters to the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board, Penn State, the University of Pittsburgh and the Pittsburgh Pirates proposed an “integrity fee” to help offset increased costs they expect to incur from legal sports betting. Further, Eric Barron, Penn State’s president, asked for a two-year moratorium on college sports betting to study its ramifications.

The Gaming Control Board solicited public comment regarding sports betting in Pennsylvania, which became possible after the U.S. Supreme Court in May struck down a federal law barring the practice in most states. Penn State, Pitt, the NFL (on behalf of the Pittsburgh Steelers and Philadelphia Eagles) and the Pittsburgh Pirates were among those providing input.

The organizations sought a range of restrictions on legal sports betting, from age requirements to limits on “proposition” bets. Penn State went furthest in asking for the two-year freeze on college-sports wagering.

Barron said the proposal would allow schools to study a potential “integrity fee” to offset their expected education and compliance costs. The fee would be unpopular, since Pennsylvania already will impose a $10 million licensing fee and a 36 percent tax rate on casinos that offer sports betting. But it’s one several organizations seek.

In Pitt’s letter, Athletic Director Heather Lyke wrote that sports betting would have a “negative effect on the integrity of college athletics and on the health, safety and welfare of Pitt’s students.” Further, she wrote that sports betting would have “considerable financial costs to Pitt’s operations,” thus requiring the fee.

Similarly, the Pirates wrote that they are “very concerned” that the law does not include an integrity fee, which the club said would allow it to monitor betting lines and “unsavory characters” seeking to influence them. In addition, the Pirates said they would seek a portion of betting revenue for maintenance to PNC Park.

“Sources looking to influence or gain an unfair advantage in wagering on collegiate sporting events occurring in Pennsylvania will be overwhelmingly ‘local’ to Pennsylvania,” Barron wrote. “Limiting the ability of such local parties to place wagers on Pennsylvania college and university athletic events, at least during this two-year temporary period, will substantially reduce the likelihood of issues arising before our institutions can put into place the policies and procedures and educational programs to appropriately manage the risks associated with sports wagering on their athletic contests.”

Regarding the two-year trial delay, Barron called it necessary to educate staff and student-athletes and consider competitive advantages between teams from different states. Barron wrote that Act 42, the 2017 law that expanded gambling in Pennsylvania to include sports betting, did not address potential issues such as cheating or the public disclosure of student-athletes’ injuries.

College coaches have different policies regarding the release of injury status. Penn State football coach James Franklin, for instance, has said he will acknowledge only those injuries that are season-ending. Professional leagues have their own policies regarding disclosure of player injuries.

“There may now be obligations or pressures to disseminate information about student-athlete injuries or playing status, which would have to be balanced with student privacy expectations and interests,” Lyke wrote.

Barron wrote that he supports New Jersey’s policy that prohibits betting on amateur sports taking place in New Jersey or involving New Jersey teams. As a result, fans in New Jersey will not be able to bet on this season’s Penn State-Rutgers football game.

“The absence of financial compensation for amateur athletes creates an opportunity for inappropriate influence,” Barron wrote, “which is not uniformly addressed in Act 42 and in some parts not addressed at all.”
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
18,959
Tokens
https://www.paonlinecasino.com/2802/pgcb-supplier-sports-betting-applications/



On Wednesday, the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board (PGCB) opened up the application period for sports betting operators, manufacturers, and suppliers.

A press release from the PGCB provided definitions of each category of applicant, essentially splitting the categories up into companies that operate sports betting systems, manufacture equipment that’s used in sports betting, or supply manufactured equipment.


Pennsylvania is in uncertain sports-betting times

At the time of publishing, no casinos had applied for a sports betting license, rendering the announcement of the new license application period relatively unimportant.

This absence of applications would lead one to believe that sports betting operations like William Hill, Kambi, and Bet365 won’t be filing their applications any time soon. And they certainly won’t be doing it if their partner casinos have no plans to get in the game.

It’s as if the opening of another application session is like announcing that rental applications are being accepted in a ghost town.

Many point to this lack of momentum as the direct result of Pennsylvania’s astronomically high sports betting tax rate — 36 percent — in addition to a $10 million licensing fee.

One of the more striking moments came early June when William Hill CEO Joe Asher told the Philadelphia Inquirer exactly why William Hill hasn’t jumped on the chance to enter the PA sports betting market:

“Pennsylvania is in a different bucket because of the tax rate. We can’t figure it out. Because of it, we haven’t spent the time or effort in Pennsylvania that we have in New Jersey. The tax rate is such a big challenge.”

Ashton’s reference to New Jersey is a popular one in discussions about Pennsylvania’s tax rate. The Garden State’s sports betting tax is eight percent.


High taxes another bill among many for casinos

Perhaps one of the unintended consequences of the historic 2017 gambling expansion bill was that several prominent casinos in the state — the kind at which you’d expect to see a sportsbook — spent considerable amounts of money on Category 4 (satellite) casinos licenses:

Hollywood Casino (two): $57.6 million
Philly Live!: $40.1 million
Mount Airy: $21.9 million
Parx: $8.1 million

These licenses allow the casinos to run a satellite with 300-750 slots. It will cost them another $2.5 million if they want to add up to 30 table games, too.

If Hollywood Casino were to add table games to their two satellite casinos, their overall costs just to buy licenses would be north of $62 million, and that’s not even considering the cost of building a new mini-casino.


What will future PA sports betting look like?

If Asher’s quote is any indication of how the global sportsbooks feel about the PA market, then it may be months before we hear of any big names applying for manufacturer, supplier, or operator licenses.

While Pennsylvania’s casinos seem to have cold feet, it may only take one casino to announce a partnership and subsequent sportsbook to convince casinos participating in sports betting is worth the monetary hurdles.
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
18,959
Tokens
Looks like Pennsylvania won't get sports betting before Nov......hopefully online poker will be up & running. All the traffic & money Pa will be losing by not taking bets.......stick with locals for one more season, & a few trips to Delaware during the season will be fun.
 
Joined
Jan 17, 2007
Messages
99,709
Tokens
They might be worst than NY with that $10mil and 36% tax take.
At least NY doesn't have it in Law. Lol
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
18,959
Tokens
http://www.philly.com/philly/busine...sey-casinos-20180716.html?amphtml=y&mobi=true



Pa.'s sports betting taxes so high legal bookmakers may shun state


When the Pennsylvania legislature passed a sports-wagering law last year, it placed an audacious initial bet — it set the highest fees and taxes in the nation for operators to participate in the sports-betting business.

Critics say that Pennsylvania’s $10 million license fee, along with a 36-percent tax rate — four times higher than New Jersey’s — are a big impediment to the roll out of sports betting in Pennsylvania. None of Pennsylvania’s 12 casinos have yet to apply for a license to cash in on a potential multi-billion-dollar business now conducted mostly in the shadows.

“With a 36 percent tax and a $10 million license fee, there are other states that are more interesting to us,” said Dan Shapiro, vice president of business development of William Hill USA, the giant British bookmaker that operates two of the three legal sportsbooks that opened in June at the New Jersey Shore.

“It’s just not something we’re looking at seriously right now.”

Insiders say it is likely that one or more larger casinos will apply for sports-gaming licenses, though the window is narrowing for the gaming control board to certify the license in time for the start of the NFL regular season in early September.

But lawmakers are confident that they’ve bet on a sure thing — the opportunity to draw thousands of sports-crazy bettors to casinos, and the siren call of conducting online betting even during sports events, will be too hard for casinos to resist.


“For these casinos, competition is everything,” said State Rep. Rob Matzie, (D., Allegheny), the sponsor of the sports-betting bill that was incorporated into the 2017 gaming act.

“If the Sands in Allentown decides to do it, or the Rivers in Pittsburgh, or the SugarHouse in Philadelphia, then all of a sudden everyone will fall in line, and they’ll all want to be part of that,” he said.

Pennsylvania’s sport-wagering legislation, which was passed last year while federal laws still outlawed the practice outside Nevada, got little attention until the U.S. Supreme Court legalized sports betting on May 14.

“We look forward to adding sports betting across all our gaming platforms as soon as possible,” Greg Carlin, chief executive of Rush Street Gaming LLC, operator of SugarHouse Casino in Fishtown, said in a statement after the court decision.

Right now SugarHouse and Pennsylvania’s other licensed casinos, which are the only entities that can apply for sports-betting certificates, are holding their cards close to the vest in this high-stakes poker game with the state.

A sports-wagering license, in addition to allowing betting at a physical casino location, also permits its owner to conduct online sports-betting. As in New Jersey, only betters whose computers or phones verify their location is within state lines are permitted to wager to avoid running afoul of the federal Wire Act prohibitions on cross-border gambling.

Casinos lobbied Pennsylvania lawmakers to reconsider the high taxes and fees, which they say make it difficult to earn a profit.

The state fees “are the highest in the world and may make it impossible for a casino operator to make any return on its investment of capital,” Daniel Ihm, vice president and general manager of the Hollywood Casino at Penn National Race Course near Harrisburg, said in a letter to the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board in June. With Pennsylvania’s high costs, he estimated Hollywood Casino would lose 40 cents on every $100 bet.

Even the National Football League, which opposed the legalization of sports betting, urged the legislature to reconsider the taxes because they make licensed sportsbooks uncompetitive with illegal bookmakers.

“As the board works with state policymakers, we respectfully ask that you reconsider laws and regulations that could have the unintended consequence of advancing illegal sports betting,” Jocelyn Moore, the NFL’s senior vice president of public policy and government affairs, said in a letter to the gaming board.

But the legislature declined to reopen the law and adjourned for the summer, confident there is a low risk to the state if the casinos do not take up the offer. The Pennsylvania budget is counting on receiving only $30 million in revenue this year from sports-gaming licenses, according to the Independent Fiscal Office.

There is no doubt that Pennsylvania’s 36-percent sports gaming tax (the state portion is 34 percent and 2 percent goes to host communities) is very high compared to other states. Nevada’s sports-betting tax is 6.5 percent, and West Virginia’s rate is 10 percent. New Jersey’s rate is 8.5 percent for wagering in casinos, and 13 percent for online sports betting. In addition, all states must pay a federal excise tax, which amounts to about another 5 percent.

And Pennsylvania’s $10 million license fee compares to a $100,000 fee in West Virginia. New Jersey charges no fee.

“I know it’s expected for industry to complain about high taxes,” said Chris Grove, a sports betting expert at Eilers & Krejcik, a Las Vegas gaming consultant. “I think you have something beyond that in Pennsylvania.”

He said Pennsylvania’s tax rate is “so much of an outlier that it may distort the market in terms of who participates in it, how competitive it is, and how able it is to take share away from the existing black market.”

Americans now bet an estimated $150 billion a year on sporting events, mostly illegally, and that number is expected to rise in legalized states where wagering is destigmatized and easily accessible — especially if bettors can wager online through mobile devices.


State taxes are collected not on the total amount bet, but on the “gross gaming revenue” — the house cut, or the amount of money not paid out to winners. A sportsbook typically pays winners about 94 percent of the money bet. The 6 percent of the bets remaining is the amount on which the state tax is assessed.

Casinos in high-tax jurisdictions are expected to recover the higher cost by offering less attractive odds, and by spending less on marketing, technology, and customer service, say gaming experts. While the government generates more income at high tax rates, the casinos generate less employment and legal economic activity.

“These changes would be expected to make legal sports betting less attractive to some gamers relative to illegal alternatives,” said the authors of a 2017 study by Oxford Economics for the American Gaming Association. That study examined three taxing scenarios in which the “high tax” model was 16 percent — less than half of Pennsylvania’s rate.

At tax rates above 20 percent, gamblers migrate to illegal bookies in larger numbers, according to a 2016 study of online gaming by Copenhagen Economics for the Swedish government. The study, which examined European gambling taxes ranging from 15 percent in the United Kingdom to 46 percent in France, concluded that the optimal tax rate fell into a range of 15-20 percent.

For William Hill, the international bookmaker that operates the sportsbooks at Monmouth Park Racetrack and Ocean Resort Casino in New Jersey, a high tax rate creates an environment where illegal bookies continue to thrive because they don’t pay taxes and compliance costs that a regulated bookmaker faces.

“At the end of the day, a bookie who has had a relationship with his client for many years can say, `Hey don’t go to the casino, wager with me, I’ll give you a 25 percent rebate on your losses at the end of the year,’ because he has that advantage over the legal operators,” said Shapiro, William Hill’s head of business development.


The Pennsylvania legislature took up the sports-betting measure last year anticipating that the Supreme Court might rule in New Jersey’s favor and overturn the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act of 1992. But legislators were also concerned that Congress might enact new federal legislation outlawing sports betting that would exempt states with sports-betting laws already on the books.

Pennsylvania’s sports-betting bill originally set the tax rate at 18 percent — 16 percent for the state, and 2 percent local share. But as the bill was merged with other gaming legislation into an omnibus gambling measure now known as Act 42, the sports-wagering tax was doubled to 36 percent.

Matzie, the sponsor of the sports-betting law, said he initially set the sports-betting tax rate at the same rate as casino table games because they are comparable labor-intensive gaming forms. But as lawmakers examined the business more closely, the Republican leadership believed that the potential for online sports betting more closely resembled automated slot machines, which are taxed at a higher rate.

It was also seen as an easy target to generate revenue without raising general taxes. “There aren’t many folks in the General Assembly who want to raise taxes, so any opportunity you can come up with without touching everybody, I think that led to a discussion that got the number up, too,” Matzie said.

When the gaming bill was approved, most public attention was focused on the more immediate impact of mini casinos and online gaming, rather than the hypothetical prospects of sports gaming still banned under federal law. The sports-betting tax rate was not subject to a complete analysis.

“It made sense, it was reasonable, it was rational, and no one was really fixated on it anyway because of all the other commotion going on in the gaming bill,” said Drew Crompton, chief of staff to Senate President Pro Tempore Joe Scarnati and the Senate’s top attorney.


But now that the sports-betting tax rate is set, the legislature is inclined to wait and see how it all turns out. The casino industry has a history of complaining about high taxes. And yet casino gaming is thriving in Pennsylvania.

“So far,” said Crompton, “we’re not worse for wear.”

How would Pa. calculate the state tax on sports bets?

State taxes on sports wagering are calculated on a casino’s gross winnings or “hold” from betting – not on the total amount wagered by bettors.

According to Pennsylvania law, the 36 percent tax is assessed on “gross sports gaming revenue,” which is defined as the amount of money placed in bets minus the cash that is paid back to winners.

If a casino’s hold is 5 percent, it retains $5 for every $100 bet. The 36 percent Pennsylvania tax is assessed on $5 – which means the state’s cut is $1.80 of every $100 bet.


If a casino’s hold is 6 percent, it retains $6 of a $100 bet, and the state’s share would be $2.10.

The 36 percent tax includes two parts: 34 percent to the state and 2 percent to local governments that host the gaming facility.

The federal tax on sports betting is calculated differently – not on the casino’s gross gaming revenue, but on the total amount bet – the “handle.”

The federal sports betting handle tax is set at 0.25 percent of the total amount bet. For every $100 bet, regardless of how much the casino wins, Uncle Sam walks away with 25 cents.
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
9,947
Tokens
Good reading Computer Group...… Where does this money go, or do they say how it will be used?

"Uncle Sam" is Payroll in this State!
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
18,959
Tokens
Good reading Computer Group...… Where does this money go, or do they say how it will be used?

"Uncle Sam" is Payroll in this State!

Yeah, I I'm wondering where all the tax money is going as well......but Pa lawmakers are definitely greedy with the tax rate & $10 million license fee.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 27, 2015
Messages
127
Tokens
I told everyone right from the beginning that it would be a real long, drawn out struggle for PA to get sports betting, if ever. The worst part is, they don't seem to care. O, well, their loss. Slimy dirtbags.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
19,217
Tokens
If the Eagles and Steelers cover in the same week PA will be broke
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,109,621
Messages
13,461,215
Members
99,484
Latest member
Mtek65
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com