It looks like the two main ones we're missing are Gridiron Gold Sheet NFL and Bondi
drive.google.com
drive.google.com
drive.google.com
drive.google.com
drive.google.com
drive.google.com
drive.google.com
drive.google.com
drive.google.com
drive.google.com
drive.google.com
drive.google.com
drive.google.com
drive.google.com
drive.google.com
drive.google.com
drive.google.com
drive.google.com
drive.google.com
drive.google.com
drive.google.com
drive.google.com
Power Sweep claims the following:Newsletter Tracking (through 11/17/2025)
The records here will reflect the lines listed in the newsletters at the time the plays were published. This is for the rated plays, the high-ranking plays, and any type of play worth tracking. There’s no reason to keep track of every bottom-tier or “recommended” play; it’s not worth the work.
Sometimes the newsletters will cheat a little by claiming a different common or later line if it turns a loss into a push or otherwise boosts their record. I’ll usually be able to note what happened to explain the discrepancy.
I’ll also highlight particularly good or bad weekends or short-term runs. I will not include picks from newsletter issues that we don’t get in time.
Starting to color-code the hottest and coldest records. Usually just anything hitting/missing around 70% or more with a reasonable sample.
Best & Worst
GGS NFL (18-6-0)
Playbook Awesome Angle (10-2-0)
Gold Sheet NCAA Tech Plays (10-2-0)
Pointwise NCAA 2* (3-9-0)
Power Sweep NCAA 4* (3-8-1)
Gridiron Gold Sheet
NCAA (22-25-2)
NFL (18-6-0)
Bondi Bulletin (we didn't get it this week)
2* NCAA (5-3-0)
1* NCAA (9-14-0)
2* NFL (2-5-0)
1* NFL (7-7-0)
Marc Lawrence Playbook NCAA
5* (5-6-1)
4* (6-6-0)
3* (7-5-0)
Upset pick (7-6-0)
Betcha Didn't Know (6-10-0)
Awesome Angle (10-2-0)
Incredible Stat (5-3-0)
Marc Lawrence Playbook NFL
5* (5-6-0)
4* (6-5-0)
3* (6-5-0)
Pointwise NCAA
1* (15-9-0)
2* (3-9-0)
3* (5-7-0)
4* (13-11-0)
5* (11-13-0)
Pointwise NFL
2* (0-0-0)
3* (9-13-0)
4* (6-5-0)
5* (9-12-1)
Power Sweep NCAA (2-7 overall in this section this week)
4* (3-8-1)
3* (8-16-0)
2* (14-11-0)
Underdog Play of the Week (5-7-0)
Tech Play of the Week (8-3-0) (lost this week)
Revenge Play of the Week (4-5-0)
Situational Play of the Week (6-2-0) (lost this week)
Series Play of the Week (4-2-1)
Power Sweep NFL
4* (3-7-1)
3* (8-3-0)
2* (7-4-0)
3* o/u play (6-5-0)
Power Rating POW (0-0-1)
Power Plays (6-4 overall this week, 6-5 last week)
NCAA 4.5* (17-16-1)
NCAA 4* (45-32-1)
NFL 4* (5-5-1)
Red Sheet (nothing again this week; previous weeks' records from another contributor)
90* (0-0-0)
89* (2-6-0)
88* (3-8-1)
NFL 88* (4-0-0)
Sports Reporter (missed like 8 weeks of this one)
NCAA Super Best Bets (0-0-0)
NCAA Best Bets (6-6-0)
NFL Super Best Bets (0-0-0)
NFL Best Bets (3-3-0)
Winning Points
NCAA 4* (0-0-0)
NCAA 3* (0-0-0)
NFL 4* (0-0-0)
NFL 3* (0-0-0)
King’s Totals Tipsheet
10* GOY (0-0-0)
3* (7-6-0)
2* (11-9-0)
1* (0-0-0)
Team Total of the Week
2* (9-7-1)
1* (2-3-0)
Gold Sheet NCAA
Key Releases (14-21-1)
Priority Picks (11-13-0)
Tech Plays (10-2-0)
Gold Sheet NFL
Key Releases (18-14-1)
Priority Picks (11-11-0)
Tech Plays (3-7-0) (won this week)
Powers' Ratings NCAA
(no actual best bets in his newsletter again this year)
Top Computer Play (5-8-0)
Inside the Press Box NCAA
Phil's Best Bets (17-31-0)
Phil's FCS Best Bets (3-1-0)
Computer Best Bets (20-24-1)
Computer FCS Best Bets (4-0-0)
Inside the Press Box NFL
Phil’s Best Bets (14-13-0)
Computer Best Bets (0-0-0)
Feel free to point out any typos or grading errors
I actually show 38-19-1Power Sweep claims the following:
POWER PLAYS 4H & 4.5H PLAYS 36-19-1 LAST 6 WEEKS!!!
Is that accurate?