Is this the craziest ending to any game ever?

Search

New member
Joined
Feb 8, 2010
Messages
5,621
Tokens
You're missing the point. All calls matter. If they don't call PI against Seattle on 3rd and 3, GB punts the ball and doesn't score a TD. If you didn't have money on GB, you'd understand.

I can see by your avatar you are not biased
 

Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2008
Messages
8,332
Tokens
You're missing the point. All calls matter. If they don't call PI against Seattle on 3rd and 3, GB punts the ball and doesn't score a TD. If you didn't have money on GB, you'd understand.

There was missed calls the entire game for both sides. But this was the last play of the game, it was very clear what happened, and then 1 official ruled Touchback and 1 ruled Touchdown. They botched the call. With all those other plays, who knows how the game would have turned out, but that last play determined the game
 

New member
Joined
Sep 13, 2005
Messages
2,369
Tokens
You're missing the point. All calls matter. If they don't call PI against Seattle on 3rd and 3, GB punts the ball and doesn't score a TD. If you didn't have money on GB, you'd understand.

Or the missed PI down the middle on the Seattle TE during the last drive. We could go on and on.

No fukin point missed. This was the last play of the game. GB had no chance to fix a wrong. Get the point smart guy.
 

Rx Senior
Joined
Dec 7, 2004
Messages
18,351
Tokens
lots of blown calls....but the last play is the last play. Kind of like when refs review NBA possessions and stuff towards the end of games....


yes, green bay should've scored 3 more TDs to put it out of reach but this one being scrutinized is justified. The last play is more important than all the others....regardless of who made out from stupid calls by #26 before that
 

New member
Joined
Feb 3, 2007
Messages
1,916
Tokens
int.jpg
 

New member
Joined
Dec 20, 2003
Messages
9,069
Tokens
packers deserved to lose this game, they didnt play well at all

The Packers played well enough to defeat an inferior Seahawks team.

The referees should not be making atrocious calls to compensate for any difference in team ability.


I have no idea why the call was not overturned by the replay official.
 

Save A Tree, Eat A Beaver
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
33,408
Tokens
New NFL Rule: You can now catch the ball by catching the guy who holds the ball.
 

Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2007
Messages
12,071
Tokens
I have no idea why the call was not overturned by the replay official.

I literally said this out loud while watching the game and right when I said it 1 of the announcers stated they could not overturn this on replay review, that rule needs to be changed ASAP
 

New member
Joined
Feb 8, 2010
Messages
5,621
Tokens
Which call couldn't be over ruled 2 officials made 2 different calls or didnt you notice that
 

Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2008
Messages
2,604
Tokens
+1

Jennings made the interception, than Tate tried to take away ball.

Refs made 4 severely blatant errors in the last 5 minutes all in favor of Seattle.

1. Ruffing passer on a G.B interception. Game over!
2. Pass interference on 2nd and 35, clearly offensive interference
3. Blatant offensive interference on last play, not call.
4. Ball intercepted on last play but call a reception.

I was on the wrong side once again. Jesus fukin Moses!

Not going to argue with you on 2+3+4, the personal foul was crap, too, but have to watch that scene again because I wasn't sure if the defender maintained possession on the ground or if he lost and regained possession out of bounds.
Still doesn't take anything away from 4 really bad calls against the Packers in the final minutes.
For the record though: That pass interference call on 3rd down against the Seahawks defender covering (I think) Finley was bullshit, too, at least in my opinion just a greatly timed defensive play and the flag kept GBs touchdown drive alive around midfield.
 

New member
Joined
Dec 20, 2003
Messages
9,069
Tokens
In defense of the referees, they don't get slow motion replay.

I can almost see why a ref would rule that as the DB and WR both coming down with the ball.
 

Breaking Bad Snob
Joined
Dec 5, 2004
Messages
13,430
Tokens
In defense of the referees, they don't get slow motion replay.

I can almost see why a ref would rule that as the DB and WR both coming down with the ball.

The first ref in was giving the touchback signal.
 

Breaking Bad Snob
Joined
Dec 5, 2004
Messages
13,430
Tokens
I have no idea why the call was not overturned by the replay official.

On the NFL Network, some talking head said that if the ruling on the field is simultaneous possession, it's not a reversible call. For some damn reason.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,109,886
Messages
13,463,763
Members
99,493
Latest member
LuckyB69
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com