Snow Totals Piling Up Fast; 130 Year Old Record Falls
http://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/2014/02/13/snow-totals-piling-up-fast/
This is how uneducated people argue against global warming, lol.
The 3 coldest winters I observed were 1976-77, 1994 & this year 2014 each a little over 15 years apart so the last 10 years don't appear unusual.
January 76 every time I crossed the GW bridge the Hudson was completely frozen over for more than a month. In 94 you could see snow on the ground for over 2 months in a row in never melted & this year is almost as bad.
Anyone who's dense enough to support or continues to support Obama is likely to try to keep the notion of Global Warming alive.
A religious cult, indeed.
Climate scientists slam Obama science czar’s ‘pseudo-science rambling’ on global warming
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2014/02/14/c...nce-rambling-on-global-warming/#ixzz2tWtSY5y2
"Well, all I can think of is that his statement is not based in science.”
Slapping-silly90))
Many liberals believe Bush/Cheney orchestrated the 9/11 attacks.
Heck, the President of the United States is on record saying that Global warming causes hurricanes and wildfires and unemployment benefits create jobs. Not only could you not utter a peep of criticism of the President for those comically stupid statements, you voted for him for re-election.
Carry on, Boob.
You're so "educated" that nobody believes you attended college, you've never had a real job, you have no ability to read and comprehend sentences, and have been reduced to shouting "I totally went to college guys!!!" on an Internet forum.
Smart people do that sort of thing all the time.
Really, they do.
You are comically stupid:
"How likely is it that people in the federal government either assisted in the 9/11 attacks or took no action to stop the attacks because they wanted the United States to go to war in the Middle East?" the poll asked.
A full 22.6% of Democrats said it was "very likely." Another 28.2% called it "somewhat likely."
That is: More than half of Democrats, according to a neutral survey, said they believed Bush was complicit in the 9/11 terror attacks.
http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0411/More_than_half_of_Democrats_believed_Bush_knew.html
Don't worry stupid, you've never given this topic any thought. You're just typing silly BS because that is what you do.
How likely is it that the Pentagon was not struck by an airliner captured by terrorists but instead was hit by a cruise missile fired by the United States military?
Only 11.9 percent of all voters believed that this was “somewhat” or “very” likely, but 21.1 percent of Democrats did.
How likely is it that the collapse of the Twin Towers in New York was aided by explosives secretly planted in the building?
A full 15.9 percent of all voters bought that; the number rose to 24.8 percent among Democrats.
You silly liar.
How likely is it that the Pentagon was not struck by an airliner captured by terrorists but instead was hit by a cruise missile fired by the United States military?
Only 11.9 percent of all voters believed that this was "somewhat" or "very" likely, but 21.1 percent of Democrats did.
http://www.slate.com/content/slate/blogs/weigel/2011/04/25/democrats_and_trutherism.html
You latest beclowning is complete.
Carry on, boob
