You obviously didn't read my post in it's entirety (please stop with the Drake nonsense). Let's revisit it so you can get it straight...
"That's the order they were drafted. Clearly most people understand that the Giants offensive line is subpar. Barkley ranks no higher than 9th on the charts I use (so yeah, a couple of those guys could have drafted Barkley before but not much earlier). Admittedly, I don't really blame them on Barkley. With that line protecting Eli, he won't have that much time to throw. He better hope OBJ gets open quick. And if the passing game is off, that's not going to bode well for the rushing game. Johnson went later for similar reasons (lack of trust in Bradford and a running back coming off a severe injury). I wasn't worried about it as I already had Gurley. I already gave you the charts I have on Barkley. Plenty of people think he'll be outscored by the 8 in front of him.
I further went on to say who the 8 in front of him were....
1. Gurley
2. Elliott
3. Kamara
4. Bell
5. Johnson
6. Hunt
7. McCaffery
8. Fournette
9. Gordon
As for the offensive line ranking....
https://www.profootballfocus.com/news/pro-nfl-offensive-line-rankings-all-32-teams-units-entering-2018
NYG #25 (like I said, they suck). The only one worst than them is the one that surprisingly has David Johnson (yeah that guy you said should be drafted so high that you just had to join our league because the owners don't know what they're doing, lol)
As mentioned, depends on the site you use. Sporting News has Barkeley at 9, SBR Nation has him at 8, my source has him at 9. In addition (not that I care as he wasn't the ones listed in front of Barkley), but most sites have Drake in the 15 to 16 spot. Give me a break on the #35 ranking (probably the same outlier site that has Barkley listed at 5). I noticed you didn't have a lot to say on the Cobb comment. Like I said, last year was arguably his worst and you don't have any numbers to prove otherwise (which is probably why you dodged it). I'll let my comments stand on their merits and have a good laugh when I revisit this thread later in the season. Talk to you in a couple of months.
#1. you say these are the 8 people in front of him but you list 9 guys. Math is hard. For the record I have no problem with listing Barkey as the 9th RB
#2. Yes the giants have a line ranked #25. Also the Chargers are #23, The jags are #15. The Chiefs are #18 and Carolina is #21 so we aren't talking the rest of those guy play behind great OL's.
#3. Most people also realize that Barkley is also going to catch 60 plus balls and have over 300 touches easy, very likely 350+. As a general rule touches mean points in fantasy football. Melvin Gordon has never averaged 4 yards a carry in his career but he still goes really high in drafts because he touches the ball 21-22 times a game.
As far as me saying Drake was around #35 that means his ADP in the draft not his ranking among only rb's. In fact your sporting news has him being drafted at #47, which would be the 21st rb off the board but pick #47, while they have Barkley as the #9 rb going at pick #14. #14 is a lot higher then #47.
Lastly go back and read the thread. In post #26 in this thread you most certainly did say that both Cook and Drake were drafted before Barkley in your league. With Cook I wouldn't argue. They both get drafted within 6 picks or so of each other so thats not bad. However, either Barkley went really really late or Drake went way way to high. Period. Again their average draft positions are like 30 pick apart.
Yes in my personal rankings I'd probably put Barkley as #7 Rb. So I'm fine if you want to put him at #9 but in post #26 you said that in your league Drake was drafted before Barkley and that David Johnson was the 8th RB off the board which both of those things are fucking absurd.
That is no way is saying you don't know what you're doing. It's saying that if Drake was truly drafted before Barkley in your league that either there is a Dolphin homer in that league or atleast some of the people don't know what they are doing.