As the USA military death toll approaches 2000

Search

New member
Joined
Oct 21, 2002
Messages
7,379
Tokens
In Nam we were protecting Asia from the spread of Communism,in Iraq/Afghanistan/whoever else steps up we're protecting your sorry ass, stopping the spread of TERRORISM.
I'm sorry, did I miss something here? Are you posting from Iraq now?
If not, you are no more protecting anyones sorry ass than I am
 

New member
Joined
Sep 27, 2004
Messages
8,951
Tokens
How is antagonizing religious fanatics helping anyone, at home or 'over there'?
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
33,178
Tokens
We need to pull our troops out now and tell the good people over there to get out as well. Then we level that stink hole.

:raining: :raining: :storm01: :storm01: :storm01: :raining: :raining:
 

New member
Joined
Sep 25, 2000
Messages
4,257
Tokens
"...we're protecting your sorry ass, stopping the spread of TERRORISM. That is unless you strive to blown up on a bus...."

Kinda like a couple of weeks ago in London?

I guess the people of London can stick a fork in that trendy neocon statement of "fight them over there so we don't have to fight them here."

"See the NVA was an ARMY....wheres Al Queda ARMY?"

Tell that to the marines who get shot in the back by people wearing civilian clothing.....you still don't have a clue who means you harm over there, unless they're carrying a weapon, and yes, not all the dudes we fought in Vietnam had the stupidity to walk around in thier battle uniform...and yes, marines got shot in the back by people wearing civilian clothing in Vietnam also....

Doesn't really matter anyway, because you can't stay there forever at $177 million a day and the insurgents will keep shredding anything there with a pulse until we leave, and then put the homies through the woodchipper.

Cheers. :drink:
 

New member
Joined
Sep 27, 2004
Messages
8,951
Tokens
If my loved one died in VietNam or Iraq I would be equally pissed! Both wars are equally stupid! Does anyone seriously debate this? I think not!:sad3:
 

New member
Joined
Sep 25, 2000
Messages
4,257
Tokens
The neocons would debate this, they somehow think that they can waltz across Iraq, kill all the bad guys, and get democracy to take hold in that shithole.

It's only the grandkids future, just feed it into the shredder via the national credit card! :103631605
 

New member
Joined
Jun 8, 2005
Messages
2,574
Tokens
Marco said:
The neocons would debate this, they somehow think that they can waltz across Iraq, kill all the bad guys, and get democracy to take hold in that shithole.

It's only the grandkids future, just feed it into the shredder via the national credit card! :103631605

I think sometimes you guys say things thinking they will "become" tree.

We have had Debt bigger than this in the past, and everyone's grandkids are just fine.

There is ZERO evidence that supports your claim that National debt will fuck over our grandkids.
 

New member
Joined
Jun 8, 2005
Messages
2,574
Tokens
CAPN CRUNCH said:
If my loved one died in VietNam or Iraq I would be equally pissed! Both wars are equally stupid! Does anyone seriously debate this? I think not!:sad3:

I disagree. I don't think either war was "stupid".
 

New member
Joined
Sep 27, 2004
Messages
8,951
Tokens
koidog said:
I disagree. I don't think either war was "stupid".
So it was and this war is a smart war? I guess if you are talking about fleecing the American taxpayer out of alot of money and death of innocent young men doesn 't bother you then this war is genius!
 

New member
Joined
Jun 8, 2005
Messages
2,574
Tokens
CAPN CRUNCH said:
So it was and this war is a smart war? I guess if you are talking about fleecing the American taxpayer out of alot of money and death of innocent young men doesn 't bother you then this war is genius!

This war was because World Wide intellignece Said Saddam had WMD's. We know he would use them as he had before, we know he hated the US as he even attempted to Kill a former President and fired on our planes at will.

The financial cost of a war has never been relevent. The cost of live is relevent. However, while it is tragic to lose any American lives 2000 is a number that is well below any prewar estimate.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 21, 2002
Messages
7,379
Tokens
Since all these losses are so "acceptable" to you. And the war is such a worthwhile endeavor, pray tell why aren't you over there helping out in yours and bushs grand war.
You would rather someone else do the fighting for you????
 

Wooooooooh Nelly look em' go!!!
Joined
Jan 31, 2005
Messages
5,277
Tokens
Why don't you whip your Turbin out and join Al Queda where you anti "Traitor" American belong? Heard they love American traitors in their camps......
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
33,178
Tokens
The WMD are there. They just hid them under a tree or may be under a big bucket ! Their there. George said so. End of story!

:suomi: :suomi: :suomi: :suomi: :suomi: :suomi:
 

New member
Joined
Jun 8, 2005
Messages
2,574
Tokens
JinnRikki said:
Since all these losses are so "acceptable" to you. And the war is such a worthwhile endeavor, pray tell why aren't you over there helping out in yours and bushs grand war.
You would rather someone else do the fighting for you????

Another point you guys make all the time that is..well....stupid.

We have all VOLUNTEER forces, why does this bother you so?
 

Living...vicariously through myself.
Joined
May 20, 2005
Messages
8,456
Tokens
"Ask the people in London"....??? In the USA ,with freedom of speech protected for everyone,do you hear Muslim leaders praising the terrorists ,preaching continuance of such acts while here? Not anymore.. as far as I can remember it hasnt happened anytime in recent history.Didnt we all hear about the radical Islamists in Britain...mosque leaders who spread hatred toward all infidels at any cost.Failure to stop this cold is a reason this happened IMO.I guarantee the open forum to recruit wouldbe killers will not be happening again.Dont you think if terrorists could attack here they would? I mean there is no better target than the good ol' USA.If these terrorists go unabated and the USA leaves it up the countries in the Middle East to deal with them on there own (and we all know what a fine job Pakistan and Saudi Arabia do) then the US is as good as hit.Dont be naive....9-11 changed alot in this country,unforunately some countries couldnt see that it could be a reality for them too.I bet things change in London really quick now.Of course I hope that another attack doesnt come....but if this war isnt fought now then the chances of it happening multiply exponentially.Lining up the Army on the Canandian/Mexico borders will not provide the same protection that killing,capturing and interrogating these shitbags produce.

To the socialists (Democrats)....nothing you post will change the fact that being proactive in the war against terror must include military operations.This war is just.
 

Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2002
Messages
39,612
Tokens
"To the socialists (Democrats)....nothing you post will change the fact that being proactive in the war against terror must include military operations.This war is just." Couldn't the same thing be accomplished in Afghanistan?<!-- / message -->
 

919

Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2005
Messages
9,358
Tokens
koidog said:
This war was because World Wide intellignece Said Saddam had WMD's. We know he would use them as he had before, we know he hated the US as he even attempted to Kill a former President and fired on our planes at will.

The financial cost of a war has never been relevent. The cost of live is relevent. However, while it is tragic to lose any American lives 2000 is a number that is well below any prewar estimate.

NO ONE believed Iraq had nuclear capabilites....except the white house who kept saying mushroom cloud, mushroom cloud, mushroom cloud.....
 

919

Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2005
Messages
9,358
Tokens
JinnRikki said:
Since all these losses are so "acceptable" to you. And the war is such a worthwhile endeavor, pray tell why aren't you over there helping out in yours and bushs grand war.
You would rather someone else do the fighting for you????

they don't like that question do they....neo-cons like playing war....
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
33,178
Tokens
919 said:
NO ONE believed Iraq had nuclear capabilites....except the white house who kept saying mushroom cloud, mushroom cloud, mushroom cloud.....



I believe they got dem and we need to do something about it now ! They also have WMD. So we need to do something about thay too. That something is toss a few things over their and turn that country into a parking lot.


:dancefool :dancefool :suomi: :suomi: :suomi: :dancefool :dancefool
 

New member
Joined
Sep 25, 2000
Messages
4,257
Tokens
"Couldn't the same thing be accomplished in Afghanistan?"

Afghanistan, Syria, Iran, Saudi......probably a dozen or more if we wanted to invade other countries and turn the rest of the middle east into a du wasteland where the state bird is the suicide bomber and the state flower is the roadside bomb...

The neocons think planting the military in the middle east and drawing the insurgents in somehow makes us safer at home, when in fact the insurgents/terrorists don't all choose to run to Baghdad like a bug to a light bulb....some of them prefer the soft targets and London was exactly what was needed to wake these guys up to the reality that thier actions in Iraq aren't making anyone else safer......

As far as that babble about leaving it up to the middle east to deal with the terrorists.....I'm sure they'd just about as good of luck finding the next terrorist, just like the effort we had finding McVeigh before he took half a city block out in Oklahoma City.....great job of police work there dudes...but then again realists know they blend in with the common public and the middle east has about as good a chance recognizing terrorists as they would identifying people with the early signs of aids walking down the sidewalk.

"...then the US is just as good as hit. Don't be naive.."

The US will get hit again, only a matter of time. I'd rather see our military over here making an actual difference and being a visible, viable deterrent than over there shooting up Iraq and killing a few homies over there who wouldn't bother to leave the country to attack us and are fighting us because of the occupation. I'd worry about the terrorists we don't know about or can't find that are outside of the kill zone in Iraq living in Canada or Mexico or the US. Those are the ones that pose the threat.

"This war is just."

This war is just a scam for the war profitteers to clean up on, you can dump all the money you want into this war, and spend the next thirty years in Iraq or some other shithole on the planet, the fact is we're not going to be any safer at home and the terrorist agenda won't change one bit for having wasted all the men and materials. To think different is truly naive.

But anyway, carry on dudes, It's only $177 million a day and about 1800 servicemen down the drain, glad you're really making a difference, and I'm sure the people of London thank you too. Party on!:party:
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,109,675
Messages
13,461,651
Members
99,485
Latest member
giaoduc783
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com