Who is they?
At 8:55 a.m. the hijackers turned off the plane’s transponder, and it stopped sending data to air traffic controllers. The FAA lost radar contact with American Airlines Flight 77.
You seem to think the Air Force should just patrol the skies assuming a plane would crash into the Pentagon. The American skies were in chaos. At one point, the FAA was tracking 11 planes that it feared could have been hijacked.
You're writing these comments thinking the government functioned on a basis where "shoot down the planes!" was some standard operating procedure.
What does Building seven have to do with anything? Seriously, tell us why it matters? What does it mean to you? What's being hidden?
How could Building 7 have been damaged? Just in case you didn't know this, two hundred story skyscrapers around hit crumpled to the ground. Very easy to damage to building, or the foundation, lots of buildings were compromised that day
BUT PLEASE DO TELL WHAT THIS FUCKING BULLSHIT ABOUT BUILDING 7 IS SUPPOSED TO PROVE. WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO YOU?
Then tell me what you think happened on 9/11, and I'll submit 1,000 questions you can't possibly answer.
It's been a while, but I remember building 7 being about superficial / irrelevant bullshit, an absolute precursor to modern day wokeness. Internet scholars that couldn't think enough to find the cheese in a mouse maze
How could Building 7 have been damaged? Just in case you didn't know this, two hundred story skyscrapers around hit crumpled to the ground. Very easy to damage to building, or the foundation, lots of buildings were compromised that day
BUT PLEASE DO TELL WHAT THIS FUCKING BULLSHIT ABOUT BUILDING 7 IS SUPPOSED TO PROVE. WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO YOU?
Then tell me what you think happened on 9/11, and I'll submit 1,000 questions you can't possibly answer.
It's been a while, but I remember building 7 being about superficial / irrelevant bullshit, an absolute precursor to modern day wokeness. Internet scholars that couldn't think enough to find the cheese in a mouse maze
Again, easy to debunk, for anyone with at least a 2nd grade level research skills.
The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has released its long-awaited report on the collapse of World Trade 7 following the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. "Our take-home message today is that the reason for the collapse of World Trade Center 7 is no longer a mystery," NIST lead investigator Shyam Sunder told journalists at this morning's press conference in Gaithersburg, Md. "WTC 7 collapsed because of fires fueled by office furnishings. It did not collapse from explosives or from diesel fuel fires."
Conspiracy theorists have long pointed to the collapse of the 47-story structure as key evidence that the U.S. government orchestrated or abetted the 9/11 attacks. No planes struck the building, and the commonly available views of the exterior didn't show significant damage. Yet, at 5:20 pm, 7 hours after the collapse of the Twin Towers (WTC 1 and 2), WTC 7 rapidly fell in on itself. Since WTC 7 housed Secret Service and CIA offices, conspiracy theorists claimed that the building was destroyed in a controlled demolition in order to obliterate evidence of the U.S. government's complicity in the terrorist attacks. "It is impossible for a building to fall the way it fell without explosives being involved," stated actress and TV personality Rosie O'Donnell of ABC's The View in March 2007. "For the first time in history, steel was melted by fire. It is physically impossible," she said.
Today's report confirms that a fire was, indeed, the cause. "This is the first time that we are aware of, that a building taller than about 15 stories has collapsed primarily due to fires," Sunder told reporters at the press conference. "What we found was that uncontrolled building fires--similar to fires experienced in other tall buildings--caused an extraordinary event, the collapse of WTC7." The unprecedented nature of the event means that understanding the precise mechanism of the collapse is important not just to answer conspiracy theorists' questions, but to improve safety standards in the engineering of large buildings.
The final report describes how debris from the collapse of WTC 1 ignited fires on at least 10 floors of WTC 7 at the western half of the south face. Fires on Floors 7 through 9 and 11 through 13 burned out of control, because the water supply to the automatic sprinkler system had failed. The primary and backup water supply to the sprinkler systems for the lower floors relied on the city's water supply. Those water lines were damaged by the collapse of WTC 1 and 2. These uncontrolled fires in WTC 7 eventually spread to the northeast part of the building, where the collapse began.
After 7 hours of uncontrolled fires, a steel girder on Floor 13 lost its connection to one of the 81 columns supporting the building. Floor 13 collapsed, beginning a cascade of floor failures to Floor 5. Column 79, no longer supported by a girder, buckled, triggering a rapid succession of structural failures that moved from east to west. All 23 central columns, followed by the exterior columns, failed in what's known as a "progressive collapse"--that is, local damage that spreads from one structural element to another, eventually resulting in the collapse of the entire structure.
The report clarifies a number of widely debated issues concerning the collapse, particularly the role of the building's many diesel fuel tanks and the importance of structural damage from falling WTC 1 debris. Both of those factors have been cited by investigators as possibly contributing to the collapse; the 2006 Popular Mechanics book Debunking 9/11 Myths: Why Conspiracy Theories Can't Stand Up to the Facts mentions both hypotheses. However, the final NIST report downplays both scenarios, concluding that the diesel fuel stored in tanks (and intended to power backup generators) did not burn long enough or hot enough to account for structural failures. And, while debris damage to WTC 7's southern exterior was considerable (and initiated the destructive fires), the collapse originated in the northeast portion of the building. In fact, the report concludes: "Even without the structural damage, WTC 7 would have collapsed from fires."
https://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/design/a3524/4278874/
It is quite amazing that on that day it was the only time in history that a steel beamed building fell from fire, 3 times. Jet fuel does not burn near hot enough to melt those steel beams. Coincidentally all of the main support beams in bldg 7 collapsed at the same time, from building fires causing a perfectly falling demolition. Demo contractors could not have dropped that building any better. I have watched videos in the past, dont know if they are still out there, showing explosions all thru out bldg 7 just before it fell. 911 was a false flag operation perpetuated by our own government to pass the Patriot act and wage the war on terror. They also lied their asses off about weapons of mass destruction so GW could get rid of his old enemy Sadam.
You've completely missed the sarcasm! Let's say you're correct that's it's an inside job. Months maybe years of planning had to go into pulling such a scheme. How could someone screw up so badly by planting explosives in building 7?
Side note Haliburton stocks went up 400% from 94 to 97 without the need of crashing planes. It also increased another 400% from 2008 to 2014. It reached it's all time high in 2014 long after the inside job.
Total inside job.
Here is the testimony of the ticket agent who remembers ticketing the terrorists on flight 77. I guess he's getting paid off to lie as well? ROFL.
[video]https://fb.watch/7-swOhVLU9/[/video]
"I realize that there's probably nothing I could've done to prevent what happened. I've come to terms with that."
Vaughn Allex, former American Airlines gate agent, speaks about the guilt he feels for allowing hijackers onto Flight 77 on Sept. 11, 2001. https://abcn.ws/3A2kfTA
[video]https://fb.watch/7-swOhVLU9/[/video]
"I realize that there's probably nothing I could've done to prevent what happened. I've come to terms with that."
Vaughn Allex, former American Airlines gate agent, speaks about the guilt he feels for allowing hijackers onto Flight 77 on Sept. 11, 2001. https://abcn.ws/3A2kfTA
Cannot understand what Building 7 has to do with anything? WOW.
It collapsed straight downward into pulverized dust. A few small scraps hit Building 7 from the original collisions and there were some campfire sized fires on a few floors. There is no way a structure of this caliber crumbles to dust in this manner.
About 1,000 unrelated PhDs in physics and engineering from all over the country used to meet a few times a year for several days a pop, for years, to discuss the impossibility of the buildings collapsing from jet fuel, much less Building 7 that only had a few offset fires. I guess all 1,000 are idiots.
In the long run, the bottom line is that the facts are what the government says they are, JFK, Vegas shootings, election fraud, Brown/Floyd, Clinton murders, Epstein, virus origin, and so on.
It is amazing how stupid people are to not understand this.
Government asked JFK if he wanted planes marked as Cuban air force to bomb some towns in So Florida to justify the USA attacking Cuba. JFK said no.
History lesson: A LOT of wars are started with false flags; The Middle East was worth many-mucho-a lot of trillions, insiders made billions.
It collapsed straight downward into pulverized dust. A few small scraps hit Building 7 from the original collisions and there were some campfire sized fires on a few floors. There is no way a structure of this caliber crumbles to dust in this manner.
About 1,000 unrelated PhDs in physics and engineering from all over the country used to meet a few times a year for several days a pop, for years, to discuss the impossibility of the buildings collapsing from jet fuel, much less Building 7 that only had a few offset fires. I guess all 1,000 are idiots.
In the long run, the bottom line is that the facts are what the government says they are, JFK, Vegas shootings, election fraud, Brown/Floyd, Clinton murders, Epstein, virus origin, and so on.
It is amazing how stupid people are to not understand this.
Government asked JFK if he wanted planes marked as Cuban air force to bomb some towns in So Florida to justify the USA attacking Cuba. JFK said no.
History lesson: A LOT of wars are started with false flags; The Middle East was worth many-mucho-a lot of trillions, insiders made billions.
And this means what again? The WTC was not hit by planes?
Was it a hologram?
A silent implosion?
Nuclear bomb without radiation?
What did your 1000 scientists, which I'm calling bullshit on to begin with, say was the root cause? Where did they get their secret data?
Don't raise questions, try telling everyone what happened in a manner that we can't question
And since you think hundreds of thousands of professionals are idiots, I can call your mere 1000 scientists idiots
It is quite amazing that on that day it was the only time in history that a steel beamed building fell from fire, 3 times. Jet fuel does not burn near hot enough to melt those steel beams. Coincidentally all of the main support beams in bldg 7 collapsed at the same time, from building fires causing a perfectly falling demolition. Demo contractors could not have dropped that building any better. I have watched videos in the past, dont know if they are still out there, showing explosions all thru out bldg 7 just before it fell. 911 was a false flag operation perpetuated by our own government to pass the Patriot act and wage the war on terror. They also lied their asses off about weapons of mass destruction so GW could get rid of his old enemy Sadam.
Everything you just said is bullshit
And the buildings were constructed to fall in their footprints, that something they call ENGINEERING
Proving once again how uninformed you really are
Tell us what happened, then the fun begins
easy to pick truther arguments apart once they commit to something, there's a reason your all so vague
Tell us what happened, then the fun begins
easy to pick truther arguments apart once they commit to something, there's a reason your all so vague
Here is some of it:
http://investigate911.org/
Scientists Confirm Explosives Used to Demolish Towers on 9/11
[FONT="]Nano-thermite explosives shown above were gathered from the WTC debris shortly after the towers fell on 9/11. Brigham Young University Physics Professor, Dr. Steven Jones, discovered the explosives and joined an international team of nine scientists for further analysis. Through extensive laboratory testing, the scientists concluded that the samples were Nano-thermitic explosives. After a rigorous peer-review process, their paper was published in the Bentham Chemical Physics Journal, which has been endorsed by Nobel Laureates and is respected within the scientific community.[/FONT]
[FONT="]The paper's first author is Dr. Niels Harrit, a 37-year Professor of Chemistry at Copenhagen University in Denmark and an expert in Nano-chemistry, who says, "The official account put forth by NIST violates the fundamental laws of physics."[/FONT]
[FONT="]Government and independent evidence corroborates Thermitic explosives used to bring down all three WTC Towers on 9/11. (sources 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8)[/FONT]
[FONT="]Over a thousand architects, engineers, academics, and high-ranking military officers, as well as hundreds of 9/11 firemen, survivors, and family members have challenged the government's conspiracy theory. Twenty-five military officers call the official 9/11 story, "Impossible", "Ludicrous", "A well-organized cover-up". Forty-one U.S. counter-terrorism and intelligence agency veterans challenge the official 9/11 account, calling it, "terribly flawed", "laced with contradictions", "a joke", "a cover-up".[/FONT]
[FONT="]The majority of 9/11 Commissioners now say that the government lied about 9/11, including its Chairman, Thomas Kean (Republican), Vice Chairman, Lee Hamilton (Democrat), and its Senior Legal Counsel, John Farmer, who states, "there was an agreement not to tell the truth."[/FONT]
[FONT="]According to a scientific poll by New York Times & CBS News, only 16% of Americans think the government is telling the truth about 9/11, while 81% think it is hiding something or mostly lying. CNN poll shows that 89% believe there is a U.S. government cover-up surrounding 9/11.[/FONT]
