2017 NCAA Systems

Search

Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2006
Messages
24,884
Tokens
NFL Road Fav, 7 days or less rest, off SUW by 1-6 points as Road Dog in previous game.
0-14 SU + ATS ???
 

I'm from the government and I'm here to help
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
33,010
Tokens
NFL Road Fav, 7 days or less rest, off SUW by 1-6 points as Road Dog in previous game.
0-14 SU + ATS ???
teams with exactly 7 days rest are 3-0 ATS so when i make it 6 days or less it gets stronger but certainly not 14-0 against. let me mess around with a few parameters and see what i find, but here is the info:

AF and rest < 7 and p:ADW and p:margin < 7
SU:14-26-0 (-2.45, 35.0%)Teaser Records
ATS:10-27-3 (-6.65, 27.0%) avg line: -4.2+6: 14-25-1 (35.9%) -6: 6-33-1 (15.4%) +10: 23-17-0 (57.5%) -10: 4-36-0 (10.0%)
O/U:13-25-2 (-3.88, 34.2%) avg total: 40.0+6: 6-33-1 (15.4%) -6: 27-13-0 (67.5%) +10: 4-36-0 (10.0%) -10: 28-12-0 (70.0%)
RushesRush YdsPassesPass YdsCompTOsQ1Q2Q3Q4Final
Team27.2113.532.0193.918.22.03.65.24.04.016.8
Opp29.3109.232.6205.119.01.64.84.82.96.719.3
DateLinkDayWeekSeasonTeamOppSiteQ1Q2Q3Q4FinalLineTotalSUmATSmOUmDPSDPASUrATSrOUrot
Sep 24, 2017viewSunday32017DolphinsJetsaway-6.041.5
Dec 24, 2016viewSaturday162016TitansJaguarsaway0-107-93-67-1317-38-4.544.0-21-25.511.0-7.218.2LLO0
Jan 03, 2016viewSunday172015RamsFortyninersaway3-013-100-30-316-19-3.038.0-3-6.0-3-4.51.5LLU1
Dec 27, 2015viewSunday162015TexansTitansaway10-07-017-00-634-6-4.040.02824.00.012.0-12.0WWP0
Sep 27, 2015viewSunday32015FalconsCowboysaway7-1410-148-014-039-28-1.544.5119.522.516.06.5WWO0
Nov 16, 2014viewSunday112014FortyninersGiantsaway3-76-07-30-016-10-4.044.062.0-18.0-8.0-10.0WWU0
Jan 05, 2014Sunday182013FortyninersPackersaway6-07-100-010-1023-20-3.045.530-2.5-1.2-1.2WPU0
Nov 13, 2011Sunday102011RavensSeahawksaway0-107-93-37-017-22-6.540.0-5-11.5-1.0-6.25.2LLU0
Dec 05, 2010Sunday132010RamsCardinalsaway3-66-07-03-019-6-3.543.5139.5-18.5-4.5-14.0WWU0
Sep 19, 2010Sunday22010RavensBengalsaway0-00-67-33-610-15-2.039.5-5-7.0-14.5-10.8-3.8LLU0
Nov 22, 2009Sunday112009BengalsRaidersaway7-07-73-30-1017-20-9.036.0-3-12.01.0-5.56.5LLO0
Nov 15, 2009Sunday102009CowboysPackersaway0-00-30-07-147-17-3.048.0-10-13.0-24.0-18.5-5.5LLU0
Sep 27, 2009Sunday32009GiantsBuccaneersaway7-07-03-07-024-0-6.545.02417.5-21.0-1.8-19.2WWU0
Dec 21, 2008Sunday162008SteelersTitansaway0-07-107-70-1414-31-2.034.5-17-19.010.5-4.214.8LLO0
Nov 30, 2008Sunday132008ColtsBrownsaway3-30-30-07-010-6-4.544.04-0.5-28.0-14.2-13.8WLU0
Dec 09, 2007Sunday142007BuccaneersTexansaway0-77-77-70-714-28-3.040.5-14-17.01.5-7.89.2LLO0
Dec 10, 2006Sunday142006SeahawksCardinalsaway7-147-37-00-1021-27-3.044.5-6-9.03.5-2.86.2LLO0
Nov 05, 2006Sunday92006FalconsLionsaway7-107-70-30-1014-30-5.047.5-16-21.0-3.5-12.28.8LLU0
Sep 17, 2006Sunday22006SaintsPackersaway0-1314-06-014-1434-27-2.039.075.022.013.58.5WWO0
Nov 06, 2005Sunday92005BearsSaintsaway7-33-77-03-720-17-3.034.030.03.01.51.5WPO0
Oct 09, 2005Sunday52005EaglesCowboysaway0-173-107-30-310-33-3.044.0-23-26.0-1.0-13.512.5LLU0
Oct 03, 2004Sunday42004SaintsCardinalsaway0-73-77-30-1710-34-3.040.0-24-27.04.0-11.515.5LLO0
Nov 09, 2003Sunday102003ColtsJaguarsaway7-713-00-73-1423-28-5.544.5-5-10.56.5-2.08.5LLO0
Nov 02, 2003Sunday92003PanthersTexansaway7-00-03-70-710-14-5.037.0-4-9.0-13.0-11.0-2.0LLU0
Nov 25, 2001Sunday122001FalconsPanthersaway3-07-00-00-710-7-3.040.030.0-23.0-11.5-11.5WPU0
Oct 08, 2000Sunday62000ColtsPatriotsaway0-310-73-03-1416-24-3.544.0-8-11.5-4.0-7.83.8LLU0
Dec 23, 1995Saturday171995ChargersGiantsaway0-33-147-017-027-17-4.538.0105.56.05.80.2WWO0
Nov 20, 1994Sunday121994ChargersPatriotsaway0-70-310-37-1017-23-3.039.0-6-9.01.0-4.05.0LLO0
Dec 19, 1993Sunday161993RamsBengalsaway0-33-60-30-33-15-2.032.5-12-14.0-14.5-14.2-0.2LLU0
Dec 05, 1993Sunday141993SaintsBrownsaway7-100-03-73-013-17-3.534.5-4-7.5-4.5-6.01.5LLU0
Nov 28, 1993Sunday131993RaidersBengalsaway0-30-70-310-310-16-8.034.5-6-14.0-8.5-11.22.8LLU0
Nov 21, 1993Sunday121993VikingsBuccaneersaway0-37-33-100-710-23-7.538.0-13-20.5-5.0-12.87.8LLU0
Sep 26, 1993Sunday41993SeahawksBengalsaway0-06-03-010-1019-10-3.032.096.0-3.01.5-4.5WWU0
Sep 26, 1993Sunday41993BrownsColtsaway0-00-67-33-1410-23-2.034.0-13-15.0-1.0-8.07.0LLU0
Dec 27, 1992Sunday171992BillsOilersaway3-100-100-00-73-27-3.541.5-24-27.5-11.5-19.58.0LLU0
Dec 22, 1991Sunday171991PatriotsBengalsaway7-70-140-00-87-29-2.038.0-22-24.0-2.0-13.011.0LLU0
Dec 15, 1991Sunday161991BillsColtsaway21-07-00-07-735-7-15.042.02813.00.06.5-6.5WWP0
Oct 20, 1991Sunday81991FalconsCardinalsaway7-33-00-100-310-16-2.538.0-6-8.5-12.0-10.2-1.8LLU0
Dec 02, 1990Sunday131990ChiefsPatriotsaway13-010-07-77-037-7-8.537.53021.56.514.0-7.5WWO0
Oct 07, 1990Sunday51990BuccaneersCowboysaway0-73-07-00-710-14-2.539.5-4-6.5-15.5-11.0-4.5LLU0
Showing 1 to 40 of 40 entries

 

I'm from the government and I'm here to help
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
33,010
Tokens
NFL Road Fav, 7 days or less rest, off SUW by 1-6 points as Road Dog in previous game.
0-14 SU + ATS ???
it REALLY tightens up nicely when the opponent did not get blown out last game but since that happened with the Jets last week it drops Miami from the very nice tightener

A and line <= 0 and rest < 7 and p:ADW and p:margin < 7 and op:margin > -17
SU:8-26-0 (-5.56, 23.5%)Teaser Records
ATS:4-27-3 (-9.47, 12.9%) avg line: -3.9+6: 8-25-1 (24.2%) -6: 3-31-0 (8.8%) +10: 17-16-1 (51.5%) -10: 2-32-0 (5.9%)
O/U:13-20-1 (-3.09, 39.4%) avg total: 40.4+6: 6-27-1 (18.2%) -6: 24-10-0 (70.6%) +10: 4-30-0 (11.8%) -10: 25-9-0 (73.5%)
RushesRush YdsPassesPass YdsCompTOsQ1Q2Q3Q4Final
Team26.1111.432.4190.218.82.13.84.63.44.015.9
Opp30.9119.130.9204.318.81.45.15.93.17.321.4
 

Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2017
Messages
21,700
Tokens
I'm going to reply if okay. If not I will start my own thread.

I havent updated these in a couple years....so if someone can that would be good. Not necessarily this weeks games.

Play against any teamin a non- conference gamewho won SUas a double digit road dog in last outing its oponent is off a SU win 40-16 ATS
If the against team scored 22 or more 28-7 ATS.....Up that to 35 or more and a perfect 11-0 ATS
 

Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2017
Messages
21,700
Tokens
If a team lost SU on the road as a double digit favorite if on the road the next game 43-24 ATS. If they were favored by more than 10...lost to a non-conference opponent and are on the road again they are 19-2 ATS. Finally if those conditions are met and our team has winning %of .400 or better 13-0 ATS
 

Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2017
Messages
21,700
Tokens
NFl

The league is 17- 0 ATS as a 7+ home dog after they suffered a 3+ turnover margin last week if the OU is more than 35
 

I'm from the government and I'm here to help
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
33,010
Tokens
I'm going to reply if okay. If not I will start my own thread.

I havent updated these in a couple years....so if someone can that would be good. Not necessarily this weeks games.

Play against any teamin a non- conference gamewho won SUas a double digit road dog in last outing its oponent is off a SU win 40-16 ATS
If the against team scored 22 or more 28-7 ATS.....Up that to 35 or more and a perfect 11-0 ATS
p:ADW and p:line > 9.5 and not C and op:W
SU:35-72-1 (-6.70, 32.7%)Teaser Records
ATS:39-64-1 (-3.39, 37.9%) avg line: 3.2

p:ADW and p:line > 9.5 and not C and op:W and op:points > 21
SU:25-64-1 (-7.98, 28.1%)Teaser Records
ATS:31-56-1 (-3.71, 35.6%) avg line: 3.8

p:ADW and p:line > 9.5 and not C and op:W and op:points > 34
SU:14-36-0 (-7.52, 28.0%)Teaser Records
ATS:20-29-0 (-2.41, 40.8%) avg line: 5.0

If a team lost SU on the road as a double digit favorite if on the road the next game 43-24 ATS. If they were favored by more than 10...lost to a non-conference opponent and are on the road again they are 19-2 ATS. Finally if those conditions are met and our team has winning %of .400 or better 13-0 ATS
drops to 18-8 with the 40% so just using prev non-conf double digit away loss and on road again....
p:AFL and p:line < -9.5 and A and p:conference != o:conference
SU:17-22-0 (-1.03, 43.6%)Teaser Records
ATS:29-8-1 (4.93, 78.4%) avg line: 7.0+6: 34-4-0 (89.5%) -6: 17-20-1 (45.9%) +10: 35-2-1 (94.6%) -10: 9-27-2 (25.0%)

NFl

The league is 17- 0 ATS as a 7+ home dog after they suffered a 3+ turnover margin last week if the OU is more than 35
HD and line > 6.5 and p:TOM > 2 and total > 35
SU:23-49-0 (-6.82, 31.9%)Teaser Records
ATS:44-27-1 (2.26, 62.0%) avg line: 9.1+6: 51-21-0 (70.8%) -6: 30-40-2 (42.9%) +10: 56-14-2 (80.0%) -10: 20-49-3 (29.0%)
O/U:32-38-2 (2.49, 45.7%) avg total: 42.2+6: 26-46-0 (36.1%) -6: 51-20-1 (71.8%) +10: 19-51-2 (27.1%) -10: 57-13-2 (81.4%)
RushesRush YdsPassesPass YdsCompTOsQ1Q2Q3Q4Final
Team26.4110.031.8178.818.21.83.45.93.46.018.9
Opp29.0121.733.5249.521.71.85.28.06.36.125.7
DateLinkDayWeekSeasonTeamOppSiteQ1Q2Q3Q4FinalLineTotalSUmATSmOUmDPSDPASUrATSrOUrot
Sep 24, 2017viewSunday32017BearsSteelershome7.545.0



 

New member
Joined
Sep 6, 2016
Messages
807
Tokens
a couple more NFL from a new newsletter i subscribed to....


1) week 2 teams with point spread +/- 3.5 of even vs opponent that just scored 30+ are 35-8 SU, 30-10-3 ATS (on Wash, on NYG). makes sense...vegas has no belief in that team despite 30+ points scored and probably overachieved last week


2) teams blown out in week 1 divisional games are 11-1-1 ATS the following week (great angle but hou and cincy canceled each other out)


3) home teams week 2 that lost away week 1 are 36-19-1 ATS L7 years (on NO, LAC, IND, SEA, NYG)


4) game 2 dogs in 2nd of b2b divisional game are 17-5 ATS (on JAX, on CLE)


5) oppose teams that played on the showcased opening thur game, 16-7-1 (on NO, on PHI) - interesting considering the extra prep time but keep in mind NO played monday while NE played previous Thur. those MON vs THU are usually very bad spread covers for the MON team (6 straight noncovers....see below...active 3 more times this year. Still prefer NO due to the public inflating this line which should be -3.5 or -4 max)

p:day = Thursday and op:day = Monday and date > 20151123
SU:4-2-0 (11.67, 66.7%)Teaser Records
ATS:6-0-0 (9.67, 100.0%) avg line: -2.0+6: 6-0-0 (100.0%)-6: 3-2-1 (60.0%)+10: 6-0-0 (100.0%)-10: 2-4-0 (33.3%)
O/U:4-2-0 (6.58, 66.7%) avg total: 44.8+6: 2-4-0 (33.3%)-6: 5-1-0 (83.3%)+10: 2-4-0 (33.3%)-10: 6-0-0 (100.0%)
RushesRush YdsPassesPass YdsCompTOsQ1Q2Q3Q4Final
Team32.7139.835.8251.021.81.34.57.39.710.031.5
Opp24.8115.332.3204.317.82.83.36.82.86.819.8
DateLinkDayWeekSeasonTeamOppSiteQ1Q2Q3Q4FinalLineTotalSUmATSmOUmDPSDPASUrATSrOUrot
Dec 03, 2017viewSunday132017LionsRavensaway3.0
Oct 01, 2017viewSunday42017FortyninersCardinalsaway9.0
Oct 01, 2017viewSunday42017RamsCowboysaway12.5
Sep 17, 2017viewSunday22017PatriotsSaintsaway-6.556.0



Was a rough week for these "plays". Looks like they went 2-9 vs the spread. I'm sure it will be better this week.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2017
Messages
21,700
Tokens
I'm going to reply if okay. If not I will start my own thread.

I havent updated these in a couple years....so if someone can that would be good. Not necessarily this weeks games.

Play against any teamin a non- conference gamewho won SUas a double digit road dog in last outing its oponent is off a SU win 40-16 ATS
If the against team scored 22 or more 28-7 ATS.....Up that to 35 or more and a perfect 11-0 ATS

I'm not sure where they got these stats from but you got totally different ATS then them. Maybe this isn't a good system

The league is 17-0 ATS as a home dog after they suffered a 3+ turnover margin and the OU is greater than 35. 62% is pretty good, but is there anyway we can get information that adds the turnover margin of 3+ to the equation? i'd like to see if this system as good as it claims. I personally plaid it twice in those situations and both won
 

Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2006
Messages
24,884
Tokens
Thanks for the work RT. Was looking at above angle to support Jets.

Over the years I've been given many systems by Lawrence, Barbose, Toby Scot, Taxi Driver. Most were accurate but most also fell toward 500 when I u$ed them for wagers so I've tossed most out. Can't remember who gave me that one.
 

I'm from the government and I'm here to help
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
33,010
Tokens
Thanks for the work RT. Was looking at above angle to support Jets.

Over the years I've been given many systems by Lawrence, Barbose, Toby Scot, Taxi Driver. Most were accurate but most also fell toward 500 when I u$ed them for wagers so I've tossed most out. Can't remember who gave me that one.

yeah lawrence put one out this week, supposedly 21-1-1 ATS on the Lions, that I can't get better than 65% .... actually what got me into doing this was backchecking Rocky's newsletter and, to a lesser extent, the Playbook (ML) newsletter. ML does a great job but he's too invested into getting something to 8-0 ATS tightened from a 55-10 ATS system. I'd much rather know the 55-10 ....

the one you posted is very good and I have saved the tightener so thx for posting
 

I'm from the government and I'm here to help
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
33,010
Tokens
I'm not sure where they got these stats from but you got totally different ATS then them. Maybe this isn't a good system

The league is 17-0 ATS as a home dog after they suffered a 3+ turnover margin and the OU is greater than 35. 62% is pretty good, but is there anyway we can get information that adds the turnover margin of 3+ to the equation? i'd like to see if this system as good as it claims. I personally plaid it twice in those situations and both won
i already added previous turnover margin of 3 or greater. it's a 44-27 ATS spot. sorry it's not 17-0. Bears fit this week
HD and line > 6.5 and
p:TOM > 2
and total > 35
 

I'm from the government and I'm here to help
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
33,010
Tokens
a rare one....

OVER with any team that lost SU despite allowing less than 10 points and had poor time of possession. 32-6 o/u (DEN/BUF o)
p:L and po:points < 10 and p:TOP < 2018 and season > 1994
SU:17-21-0 (-3.05, 44.7%)Teaser Records
ATS:18-20-0 (-1.55, 47.4%) avg line: 1.5+6: 22-16-0 (57.9%) -6: 15-23-0 (39.5%) +10: 25-11-2 (69.4%) -10: 8-29-1 (21.6%)
O/U:32-6-0 (11.43, 84.2%) avg total: 38.8+6: 24-14-0 (63.2%) -6: 34-3-1 (91.9%) +10: 20-17-1 (54.1%) -10: 38-0-0 (100.0%)
RushesRush YdsPassesPass YdsCompTOsQ1Q2Q3Q4Final
Team28.5110.532.5205.718.82.24.08.15.15.923.6
Opp29.0137.832.7201.618.82.25.47.85.38.126.7
DateLinkDayWeekSeasonTeamOppSiteQ1Q2Q3Q4FinalLineTotalSUmATSmOUmDPSDPASUrATSrOUrot
Sep 24, 2017viewSunday32017BillsBroncoshome3.040.0

 

I'm from the government and I'm here to help
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
33,010
Tokens
one reworked from newsletter

PLAY ON away dog of 3+ that were a playoff team last year and off a good defensive performance. 68-28 ATS (on NYG) 22-7 if a divisional game

___________________________________________________________________________


here is the PLAYBOOK newsletter NFL play of week vs the actual number. Not ripping on Lawrence at all, because he puts a hell of a lot of work into his stuff, but I can't make any sense out of his #'s....

this is a very simple query for me so you can't blame it on user error ;)


PLAY ON any NFL non-division home dog of 2 or more points with a winning record if they were a playoff team last year and are facing a foe off an ATS win of 7 or more points. 22-1-1 ATS since 1992 (on DET)
tpS(PO, N=2) >= 1 and HD and line > 1.5 and NDIV and WP > 50 and op:ats margin >= 7
SU:5-5-0 (3.10, 50.0%)Teaser Records
ATS:7-3-0 (7.40, 70.0%) avg line: 4.3+6: 10-0-0 (100.0%)-6: 5-5-0 (50.0%)+10: 10-0-0 (100.0%)-10: 5-5-0 (50.0%)
O/U:5-5-0 (-1.50, 50.0%) avg total: 46.2+6: 3-7-0 (30.0%)-6: 6-3-1 (66.7%)+10: 2-8-0 (20.0%)-10: 8-2-0 (80.0%)
RushesRush YdsPassesPass YdsCompTOsQ1Q2Q3Q4Final
Team28.8125.336.1255.823.21.23.410.83.85.923.9
Opp23.999.034.4247.022.02.33.85.45.45.920.8
DateLinkDayWeekSeasonTeamOppSiteQ1Q2Q3Q4FinalLineTotalSUmATSmOUmDPSDPASUrATSrOUrot
Sep 24, 2017viewSunday32017LionsFalconshome3.549.5
 

I'm from the government and I'm here to help
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
33,010
Tokens
with 2 weeks behind us in NFL it is worth seeing how teams have done in the past 7 years coming off b2b very good scoring weeks and b2b poor scoring weeks. dps=the expected points scored based on line and total. the NYG were negative dps in both weeks so would be worth a look vs philly

p:dps < 0 and pp:dps < 0 and season > 2009 and ...
gamesATS
W - L- P (marg, %win)
Avg LineOU
W - L- P (marg, %over)
Avg TotalSU
W - L- P (marg, %win)
SDQL
2115-6-0 (6.10, 71.4%)-1.210-10-1 (-2.02, 50.0%)45.615-6-0 (7.29, 71.4%)Giants
1510-4-1 (7.13, 71.4%)-5.210-5-0 (2.27, 66.7%)46.713-2-0 (12.33, 86.7%)Patriots
2717-8-2 (2.65, 68.0%)-1.413-13-1 (0.69, 50.0%)42.918-9-0 (4.00, 66.7%)Seahawks
2617-9-0 (2.37, 65.4%)0.615-9-2 (2.85, 62.5%)43.614-12-0 (1.73, 53.8%)Texans
2315-8-0 (2.78, 65.2%)5.013-9-1 (1.24, 59.1%)45.09-14-0 (-2.26, 39.1%)Raiders
1810-6-2 (5.28, 62.5%)-1.28-10-0 (-2.17, 44.4%)42.911-7-0 (6.50, 61.1%)Bengals
1911-8-0 (0.68, 57.9%)-1.712-7-0 (8.16, 63.2%)48.09-10-0 (2.37, 47.4%)Saints
2010-8-2 (2.02, 55.6%)1.213-7-0 (6.62, 65.0%)43.212-8-0 (0.80, 60.0%)Broncos
2715-12-0 (1.17, 55.6%)4.011-15-1 (-2.31, 42.3%)41.612-15-0 (-2.81, 44.4%)Chiefs
1810-8-0 (3.08, 55.6%)2.37-10-1 (0.33, 41.2%)45.810-8-0 (0.78, 55.6%)Colts
2815-12-1 (3.02, 55.6%)0.616-12-0 (0.02, 57.1%)43.115-13-0 (2.39, 53.6%)Fortyniners
1810-8-0 (0.69, 55.6%)1.410-8-0 (3.47, 55.6%)42.88-10-0 (-0.67, 44.4%)Vikings
2714-12-1 (3.63, 53.8%)0.818-9-0 (4.41, 66.7%)42.715-12-0 (2.81, 55.6%)Bears
2211-10-1 (3.00, 52.4%)3.210-12-0 (0.84, 45.5%)43.610-12-0 (-0.23, 45.5%)Panthers
2513-12-0 (0.44, 52.0%)-2.411-13-1 (2.26, 45.8%)42.815-10-0 (2.84, 60.0%)Steelers
2211-11-0 (-1.41, 50.0%)2.112-10-0 (3.89, 54.5%)42.39-13-0 (-3.50, 40.9%)Bills
3316-16-1 (0.38, 50.0%)5.719-13-1 (4.42, 59.4%)42.59-24-0 (-5.27, 27.3%)Jaguars
2613-13-0 (1.27, 50.0%)-3.815-11-0 (4.79, 57.7%)47.116-9-1 (5.08, 64.0%)Packers
2110-10-1 (3.17, 50.0%)-1.315-6-0 (3.83, 71.4%)42.715-6-0 (4.48, 71.4%)Ravens
3115-16-0 (-1.11, 48.4%)0.219-12-0 (0.95, 61.3%)47.114-17-0 (-1.32, 45.2%)Eagles
2612-13-1 (1.75, 48.0%)2.210-16-0 (1.12, 38.5%)42.811-15-0 (-0.50, 42.3%)Dolphins
2311-12-0 (-1.46, 47.8%)2.613-9-1 (1.09, 59.1%)42.111-12-0 (-4.04, 47.8%)Cardinals
2511-12-2 (-1.22, 47.8%)2.711-14-0 (-1.86, 44.0%)45.09-16-0 (-3.96, 36.0%)Redskins
188-9-1 (1.75, 47.1%)0.812-6-0 (4.06, 66.7%)44.77-11-0 (0.94, 38.9%)Cowboys
2511-13-1 (-2.52, 45.8%)2.211-14-0 (-0.96, 44.0%)42.010-15-0 (-4.76, 40.0%)Jets
2411-13-0 (0.81, 45.8%)1.412-12-0 (0.17, 50.0%)46.911-13-0 (-0.58, 45.8%)Lions
2611-14-1 (-2.29, 44.0%)-0.78-18-0 (-3.06, 30.8%)46.212-14-0 (-1.62, 46.2%)Falcons
2912-17-0 (-3.52, 41.4%)4.018-11-0 (5.05, 62.1%)44.89-20-0 (-7.55, 31.0%)Buccaneers
2912-17-0 (0.09, 41.4%)-1.514-14-1 (2.34, 50.0%)45.416-13-0 (1.55, 55.2%)Chargers
2912-17-0 (-2.29, 41.4%)2.216-10-3 (1.62, 61.5%)43.610-19-0 (-4.48, 34.5%)Titans
2811-16-1 (-0.29, 40.7%)5.79-19-0 (-3.29, 32.1%)41.07-21-0 (-5.96, 25.0%)Browns
3511-22-2 (-3.90, 33.3%)4.918-17-0 (-0.36, 51.4%)41.710-25-0 (-8.80, 28.6%)Rams
Showing 1 to 32 of 32 entries

_____________________________________________________________________________________________-

p:dps > 0 and pp:dps > 0 and season > 2009 and ...
gamesATS
W - L- P (marg, %win)
Avg LineOU
W - L- P (marg, %over)
Avg TotalSU
W - L- P (marg, %win)
SDQL
1612-3-1 (4.50, 80.0%)2.89-7-0 (3.62, 56.2%)44.910-6-0 (1.69, 62.5%)Buccaneers
2314-8-1 (0.67, 63.6%)1.68-15-0 (-4.09, 34.8%)44.314-9-0 (-0.91, 60.9%)Dolphins
2414-10-0 (2.21, 58.3%)-3.29-15-0 (-1.98, 37.5%)43.816-8-0 (5.38, 66.7%)Chiefs
3218-13-1 (-0.55, 58.1%)-5.416-16-0 (-0.97, 50.0%)49.122-10-0 (4.84, 68.8%)Packers
3218-13-1 (3.89, 58.1%)-0.919-13-0 (3.08, 59.4%)45.221-11-0 (4.75, 65.6%)Panthers
4626-19-1 (4.74, 57.8%)-6.328-18-0 (1.26, 60.9%)48.637-9-0 (11.04, 80.4%)Patriots
3318-14-1 (2.73, 56.2%)-2.515-18-0 (0.74, 45.5%)44.221-12-0 (5.18, 63.6%)Steelers
2715-12-0 (-0.96, 55.6%)2.414-11-2 (2.52, 56.0%)44.012-14-1 (-3.37, 46.2%)Vikings
2815-13-0 (-1.05, 53.6%)2.613-15-0 (-0.29, 46.4%)46.811-17-0 (-3.68, 39.3%)Redskins
3015-13-2 (4.43, 53.6%)-3.318-12-0 (3.15, 60.0%)42.017-13-0 (7.77, 56.7%)Seahawks
3317-15-1 (-0.47, 53.1%)-2.622-9-2 (6.94, 71.0%)50.818-15-0 (2.12, 54.5%)Saints
2312-11-0 (-1.83, 52.2%)-1.410-11-2 (-0.09, 47.6%)47.212-11-0 (-0.39, 52.2%)Giants
147-7-0 (-2.46, 50.0%)2.04-9-1 (-5.18, 30.8%)44.55-9-0 (-4.43, 35.7%)Jaguars
2010-10-0 (0.45, 50.0%)1.18-12-0 (-1.62, 40.0%)46.310-10-0 (-0.65, 50.0%)Lions
2311-11-1 (2.02, 50.0%)-2.26-16-1 (-4.43, 27.3%)44.213-10-0 (4.26, 56.5%)Bengals
3115-16-0 (2.16, 48.4%)-1.913-18-0 (0.00, 41.9%)48.321-10-0 (4.06, 67.7%)Cowboys
2914-15-0 (2.60, 48.3%)-2.315-13-1 (2.07, 53.6%)49.717-12-0 (4.93, 58.6%)Falcons
2311-12-0 (-1.93, 47.8%)-0.213-10-0 (-0.13, 56.5%)42.49-14-0 (-1.78, 39.1%)Jets
178-9-0 (-2.91, 47.1%)-2.36-11-0 (-5.00, 35.3%)43.98-9-0 (-0.65, 47.1%)Texans
3013-15-2 (-1.97, 46.4%)3.015-15-0 (0.02, 50.0%)45.110-20-0 (-4.93, 33.3%)Bills
198-10-1 (-0.68, 44.4%)-3.15-14-0 (-3.79, 26.3%)47.28-11-0 (2.37, 42.1%)Chargers
2712-15-0 (-1.96, 44.4%)1.615-9-3 (5.76, 62.5%)45.012-15-0 (-3.52, 44.4%)Raiders
2812-15-1 (0.84, 44.4%)-1.216-12-0 (0.50, 57.1%)43.715-12-1 (2.07, 55.6%)Cardinals
3113-18-0 (-1.50, 41.9%)-6.419-11-1 (3.89, 63.3%)48.020-11-0 (4.90, 64.5%)Broncos
187-10-1 (-2.89, 41.2%)1.89-8-1 (-0.89, 52.9%)45.55-13-0 (-4.72, 27.8%)Bears
228-12-2 (-0.64, 40.0%)-2.58-14-0 (-1.70, 36.4%)44.113-9-0 (1.86, 59.1%)Ravens
3212-18-2 (-4.69, 40.0%)-0.218-14-0 (3.48, 56.2%)47.214-18-0 (-4.53, 43.8%)Colts
2710-16-1 (-1.54, 38.5%)-1.611-16-0 (-1.33, 40.7%)48.413-14-0 (0.04, 48.1%)Eagles
207-12-1 (-5.20, 36.8%)-2.88-12-0 (-2.88, 40.0%)42.29-11-0 (-2.45, 45.0%)Fortyniners
145-9-0 (0.29, 35.7%)2.96-8-0 (-2.04, 42.9%)43.04-10-0 (-2.64, 28.6%)Rams
175-12-0 (-4.65, 29.4%)1.88-9-0 (-0.03, 47.1%)42.13-14-0 (-6.47, 17.6%)Browns
142-12-0 (-5.54, 14.3%)0.28-6-0 (3.89, 57.1%)45.54-10-0 (-5.79, 28.6%)Titans
Showing 1 to 32 of 32 entries


 

Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2017
Messages
21,700
Tokens
Does not apply this week. If you wan I can just post what applies. Because if it doesn't it might clog your thread and may get lost. But for future reference anyway. Your choice

The Sports Data Query Language (SDQL) offers plentyof opportunity to fine-tune systems and trends with thewealth of parameters available. This system starts off witha road team on grass off a double-digit road loss. The SDQLfor this situation isp:margin<=-10 and p:A and A and surface = grassNext we insist that they had single-digit wins in theprevious regular season and are facing a non-divisionopponent that had more regular season wins in the previousseason.NDIV and PRSW < o:pRSW and PRSW<10Note that NDIV is the SDQL shortcut for a game betweennon-divisional opponents and PRSW is the SDQL shortcut forprevious regular season wins.What all this adds up to is an overconfident home team.They are facing a team that:1. Is playing their second straight road game.2. Is off a double-digit loss.3. Has fewer wins than them.4. Had fewer than ten wins the previoous season.p:margin<=-10 and p:A and A and surface = grass andNDIV and PRSW < o:pRSW and PRSW<10 and date >=20031221This system is 35-3 ATS and what is really interesting isthat the system was 0-3 ATS 2011. If we exclude 2011, thesystem is a perfect 35-0 ATS. We can also get it perfect witha number of other “tweaks.” One is by insisting that theteam has a season-to-date rushing average of at least 3.3yards per rush and that their opponent is not on a 12-plusgame winning streak. These two modest requirementsbring the system to 33-0 ATS since December 21st, 2003.The complete SDQL for the 33-0 ATS system
 

Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2006
Messages
24,884
Tokens
yeah lawrence put one out this week, supposedly 21-1-1 ATS on the Lions, that I can't get better than 65% .... actually what got me into doing this was backchecking Rocky's newsletter and, to a lesser extent, the Playbook (ML) newsletter. ML does a great job but he's too invested into getting something to 8-0 ATS tightened from a 55-10 ATS system. I'd much rather know the 55-10 ....

the one you posted is very good and I have saved the tightener so thx for posting

He gave me a ton of stuff once 20 years ago in a 2 hour phonecall. This was back when he kept stuff by hand and found it by pouring through years of ATS logs (BTW worthless as it is I have every lined Football ATS line and score since 1974). He had names for all his systems.... "All Revved Up" .... "Hibernating Wolf" etc. I would keep them all until they would fail 3 straight and eventually they all did.

Mike Neri set up his original DB before he quit to go out on his own and put out all double digit chalk the last 20 years. Lawrence's son (who doubles as a professional thief) took it over. They have the DB set to run queries and juggle numbers around 24/7 until it produces something that's "never lost" they can promote. No one handicaps in that office anymore. But there is a 6 car garage next to his house so he did something right over the years.
 

Biz

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Oct 29, 2011
Messages
14,588
Tokens
Does not apply this week. If you wan I can just post what applies. Because if it doesn't it might clog your thread and may get lost. But for future reference anyway. Your choice

The Sports Data Query Language (SDQL) offers plentyof opportunity to fine-tune systems and trends with thewealth of parameters available. This system starts off witha road team on grass off a double-digit road loss. The SDQLfor this situation isp:margin<=-10 and p:A and A and surface = grassNext we insist that they had single-digit wins in theprevious regular season and are facing a non-divisionopponent that had more regular season wins in the previousseason.NDIV and PRSW < o:pRSW and PRSW<10Note that NDIV is the SDQL shortcut for a game betweennon-divisional opponents and PRSW is the SDQL shortcut forprevious regular season wins.What all this adds up to is an overconfident home team.They are facing a team that:1. Is playing their second straight road game.2. Is off a double-digit loss.3. Has fewer wins than them.4. Had fewer than ten wins the previoous season.p:margin<=-10 and p:A and A and surface = grass andNDIV and PRSW < o:pRSW and PRSW<10 and date >=20031221This system is 35-3 ATS and what is really interesting isthat the system was 0-3 ATS 2011. If we exclude 2011, thesystem is a perfect 35-0 ATS. We can also get it perfect witha number of other “tweaks.” One is by insisting that theteam has a season-to-date rushing average of at least 3.3yards per rush and that their opponent is not on a 12-plusgame winning streak. These two modest requirementsbring the system to 33-0 ATS since December 21st, 2003.The complete SDQL for the 33-0 ATS system

This looks like its more back fitting data than being predictive.
 

Biz

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Oct 29, 2011
Messages
14,588
Tokens
with 2 weeks behind us in NFL it is worth seeing how teams have done in the past 7 years coming off b2b very good scoring weeks and b2b poor scoring weeks. dps=the expected points scored based on line and total. the NYG were negative dps in both weeks so would be worth a look vs philly

p:dps < 0 and pp:dps < 0 and season > 2009 and ...
gamesATS
W - L- P (marg, %win)
Avg LineOU
W - L- P (marg, %over)
Avg TotalSU
W - L- P (marg, %win)
SDQL
2115-6-0 (6.10, 71.4%)-1.210-10-1 (-2.02, 50.0%)45.615-6-0 (7.29, 71.4%)Giants
1510-4-1 (7.13, 71.4%)-5.210-5-0 (2.27, 66.7%)46.713-2-0 (12.33, 86.7%)Patriots
2717-8-2 (2.65, 68.0%)-1.413-13-1 (0.69, 50.0%)42.918-9-0 (4.00, 66.7%)Seahawks
2617-9-0 (2.37, 65.4%)0.615-9-2 (2.85, 62.5%)43.614-12-0 (1.73, 53.8%)Texans
2315-8-0 (2.78, 65.2%)5.013-9-1 (1.24, 59.1%)45.09-14-0 (-2.26, 39.1%)Raiders
1810-6-2 (5.28, 62.5%)-1.28-10-0 (-2.17, 44.4%)42.911-7-0 (6.50, 61.1%)Bengals
1911-8-0 (0.68, 57.9%)-1.712-7-0 (8.16, 63.2%)48.09-10-0 (2.37, 47.4%)Saints
2010-8-2 (2.02, 55.6%)1.213-7-0 (6.62, 65.0%)43.212-8-0 (0.80, 60.0%)Broncos
2715-12-0 (1.17, 55.6%)4.011-15-1 (-2.31, 42.3%)41.612-15-0 (-2.81, 44.4%)Chiefs
1810-8-0 (3.08, 55.6%)2.37-10-1 (0.33, 41.2%)45.810-8-0 (0.78, 55.6%)Colts
2815-12-1 (3.02, 55.6%)0.616-12-0 (0.02, 57.1%)43.115-13-0 (2.39, 53.6%)Fortyniners
1810-8-0 (0.69, 55.6%)1.410-8-0 (3.47, 55.6%)42.88-10-0 (-0.67, 44.4%)Vikings
2714-12-1 (3.63, 53.8%)0.818-9-0 (4.41, 66.7%)42.715-12-0 (2.81, 55.6%)Bears
2211-10-1 (3.00, 52.4%)3.210-12-0 (0.84, 45.5%)43.610-12-0 (-0.23, 45.5%)Panthers
2513-12-0 (0.44, 52.0%)-2.411-13-1 (2.26, 45.8%)42.815-10-0 (2.84, 60.0%)Steelers
2211-11-0 (-1.41, 50.0%)2.112-10-0 (3.89, 54.5%)42.39-13-0 (-3.50, 40.9%)Bills
3316-16-1 (0.38, 50.0%)5.719-13-1 (4.42, 59.4%)42.59-24-0 (-5.27, 27.3%)Jaguars
2613-13-0 (1.27, 50.0%)-3.815-11-0 (4.79, 57.7%)47.116-9-1 (5.08, 64.0%)Packers
2110-10-1 (3.17, 50.0%)-1.315-6-0 (3.83, 71.4%)42.715-6-0 (4.48, 71.4%)Ravens
3115-16-0 (-1.11, 48.4%)0.219-12-0 (0.95, 61.3%)47.114-17-0 (-1.32, 45.2%)Eagles
2612-13-1 (1.75, 48.0%)2.210-16-0 (1.12, 38.5%)42.811-15-0 (-0.50, 42.3%)Dolphins
2311-12-0 (-1.46, 47.8%)2.613-9-1 (1.09, 59.1%)42.111-12-0 (-4.04, 47.8%)Cardinals
2511-12-2 (-1.22, 47.8%)2.711-14-0 (-1.86, 44.0%)45.09-16-0 (-3.96, 36.0%)Redskins
188-9-1 (1.75, 47.1%)0.812-6-0 (4.06, 66.7%)44.77-11-0 (0.94, 38.9%)Cowboys
2511-13-1 (-2.52, 45.8%)2.211-14-0 (-0.96, 44.0%)42.010-15-0 (-4.76, 40.0%)Jets
2411-13-0 (0.81, 45.8%)1.412-12-0 (0.17, 50.0%)46.911-13-0 (-0.58, 45.8%)Lions
2611-14-1 (-2.29, 44.0%)-0.78-18-0 (-3.06, 30.8%)46.212-14-0 (-1.62, 46.2%)Falcons
2912-17-0 (-3.52, 41.4%)4.018-11-0 (5.05, 62.1%)44.89-20-0 (-7.55, 31.0%)Buccaneers
2912-17-0 (0.09, 41.4%)-1.514-14-1 (2.34, 50.0%)45.416-13-0 (1.55, 55.2%)Chargers
2912-17-0 (-2.29, 41.4%)2.216-10-3 (1.62, 61.5%)43.610-19-0 (-4.48, 34.5%)Titans
2811-16-1 (-0.29, 40.7%)5.79-19-0 (-3.29, 32.1%)41.07-21-0 (-5.96, 25.0%)Browns
3511-22-2 (-3.90, 33.3%)4.918-17-0 (-0.36, 51.4%)41.710-25-0 (-8.80, 28.6%)Rams
Showing 1 to 32 of 32 entries

_____________________________________________________________________________________________-

p:dps > 0 and pp:dps > 0 and season > 2009 and ...
gamesATS
W - L- P (marg, %win)
Avg LineOU
W - L- P (marg, %over)
Avg TotalSU
W - L- P (marg, %win)
SDQL
1612-3-1 (4.50, 80.0%)2.89-7-0 (3.62, 56.2%)44.910-6-0 (1.69, 62.5%)Buccaneers
2314-8-1 (0.67, 63.6%)1.68-15-0 (-4.09, 34.8%)44.314-9-0 (-0.91, 60.9%)Dolphins
2414-10-0 (2.21, 58.3%)-3.29-15-0 (-1.98, 37.5%)43.816-8-0 (5.38, 66.7%)Chiefs
3218-13-1 (-0.55, 58.1%)-5.416-16-0 (-0.97, 50.0%)49.122-10-0 (4.84, 68.8%)Packers
3218-13-1 (3.89, 58.1%)-0.919-13-0 (3.08, 59.4%)45.221-11-0 (4.75, 65.6%)Panthers
4626-19-1 (4.74, 57.8%)-6.328-18-0 (1.26, 60.9%)48.637-9-0 (11.04, 80.4%)Patriots
3318-14-1 (2.73, 56.2%)-2.515-18-0 (0.74, 45.5%)44.221-12-0 (5.18, 63.6%)Steelers
2715-12-0 (-0.96, 55.6%)2.414-11-2 (2.52, 56.0%)44.012-14-1 (-3.37, 46.2%)Vikings
2815-13-0 (-1.05, 53.6%)2.613-15-0 (-0.29, 46.4%)46.811-17-0 (-3.68, 39.3%)Redskins
3015-13-2 (4.43, 53.6%)-3.318-12-0 (3.15, 60.0%)42.017-13-0 (7.77, 56.7%)Seahawks
3317-15-1 (-0.47, 53.1%)-2.622-9-2 (6.94, 71.0%)50.818-15-0 (2.12, 54.5%)Saints
2312-11-0 (-1.83, 52.2%)-1.410-11-2 (-0.09, 47.6%)47.212-11-0 (-0.39, 52.2%)Giants
147-7-0 (-2.46, 50.0%)2.04-9-1 (-5.18, 30.8%)44.55-9-0 (-4.43, 35.7%)Jaguars
2010-10-0 (0.45, 50.0%)1.18-12-0 (-1.62, 40.0%)46.310-10-0 (-0.65, 50.0%)Lions
2311-11-1 (2.02, 50.0%)-2.26-16-1 (-4.43, 27.3%)44.213-10-0 (4.26, 56.5%)Bengals
3115-16-0 (2.16, 48.4%)-1.913-18-0 (0.00, 41.9%)48.321-10-0 (4.06, 67.7%)Cowboys
2914-15-0 (2.60, 48.3%)-2.315-13-1 (2.07, 53.6%)49.717-12-0 (4.93, 58.6%)Falcons
2311-12-0 (-1.93, 47.8%)-0.213-10-0 (-0.13, 56.5%)42.49-14-0 (-1.78, 39.1%)Jets
178-9-0 (-2.91, 47.1%)-2.36-11-0 (-5.00, 35.3%)43.98-9-0 (-0.65, 47.1%)Texans
3013-15-2 (-1.97, 46.4%)3.015-15-0 (0.02, 50.0%)45.110-20-0 (-4.93, 33.3%)Bills
198-10-1 (-0.68, 44.4%)-3.15-14-0 (-3.79, 26.3%)47.28-11-0 (2.37, 42.1%)Chargers
2712-15-0 (-1.96, 44.4%)1.615-9-3 (5.76, 62.5%)45.012-15-0 (-3.52, 44.4%)Raiders
2812-15-1 (0.84, 44.4%)-1.216-12-0 (0.50, 57.1%)43.715-12-1 (2.07, 55.6%)Cardinals
3113-18-0 (-1.50, 41.9%)-6.419-11-1 (3.89, 63.3%)48.020-11-0 (4.90, 64.5%)Broncos
187-10-1 (-2.89, 41.2%)1.89-8-1 (-0.89, 52.9%)45.55-13-0 (-4.72, 27.8%)Bears
228-12-2 (-0.64, 40.0%)-2.58-14-0 (-1.70, 36.4%)44.113-9-0 (1.86, 59.1%)Ravens
3212-18-2 (-4.69, 40.0%)-0.218-14-0 (3.48, 56.2%)47.214-18-0 (-4.53, 43.8%)Colts
2710-16-1 (-1.54, 38.5%)-1.611-16-0 (-1.33, 40.7%)48.413-14-0 (0.04, 48.1%)Eagles
207-12-1 (-5.20, 36.8%)-2.88-12-0 (-2.88, 40.0%)42.29-11-0 (-2.45, 45.0%)Fortyniners
145-9-0 (0.29, 35.7%)2.96-8-0 (-2.04, 42.9%)43.04-10-0 (-2.64, 28.6%)Rams
175-12-0 (-4.65, 29.4%)1.88-9-0 (-0.03, 47.1%)42.13-14-0 (-6.47, 17.6%)Browns
142-12-0 (-5.54, 14.3%)0.28-6-0 (3.89, 57.1%)45.54-10-0 (-5.79, 28.6%)Titans
Showing 1 to 32 of 32 entries



Why would the past 7 years be relevant today?

Coaches change, players change, etc...
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,109,315
Messages
13,458,885
Members
99,468
Latest member
nnhoa877
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com