If they go from finishing 3-13 (worst record in the NFL) to the playoffs within two years will you believe it was a shitty hire then?
What type of success does Kingsbury need to have for you to admit your opinion was a bad one?
Then wouldn't it make more sense for a team to take a chance on him as an OC?
So according to you, if the Cardinals win the Super Bowl within two years this is still a bad hire?
Do you know how ridiculous that sounds?
I'm saying right now knowing what we know at this moment, it's a shitty hire as he hasn't ever produced results and there are countless more qualified coaches than him out there.
Do you know how ridiculous it sounds to defend this hire right now?
Who's defending the hire?
I'm a level headed, fair person. The Cardinals saw something in him they liked. I'm willing to wait and see how it goes. As a fan, nothing was worse than watching that product last season. That was the worst Cardinals team since they moved to AZ.
You seem pretty stubborn. To not admit you were wrong 2 years later if they win the Super Bowl is just plain dumb.
Something like this should absolutely be judged on results, not what some IT guy in Seattle or what Colin Cowherd thinks of it.
Agree with the above sentiment, they need to go out and get a big time DC and keep Kliff away from that side of the game.
You're arguing with everyone here Kingsbury is the right fit.
Will you at least admit this hire is a stretch and there are more qualified coaches out there to choose from?