Ya don't say: Impeachment reversal: Diplomat now acknowledges quid pro quo, ROTFLMAO

[HamGlaze]

It's easy to give sworn testimony when you're swearing that you're only giving your opinion, ass hat. Your .000 average is in no danger of becoming .001 :fckmad::trx-smly0:bigfinger:madasshol^^

And remember the threads he started about the Russian Collusion “HOAX”? Yeah, uhhh what happened? And now we’re somehow to lend any credence to this Ukraine quid pro quo hoax as well? He swings and misses so much he’s boring with this garbage. He can’t even get a foul tip for shit sakes.

 

[bilbal]

And remember the threads he started about the Russian Collusion “HOAX”? Yeah, uhhh what happened? And now we’re somehow to lend any credence to this Ukraine quid pro quo hoax as well? He swings and misses so much he’s boring with this garbage. He can’t even get a foul tip for shit sakes.

He seems to enjoy being the forum pinata

 

[Dave007inVegas]

Biden's protection racket revealed:

[FONT=Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Calibri,Geneva,sans-serif]Solomon is blowing the top off with his invesigating and as usual no one is paying attention.[/FONT]

 

[Dave007inVegas]

He seems to enjoy being the forum pinata

[FONT=Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Calibri,Geneva,sans-serif]This is the only place in his misrable life that pays him any attention. [/FONT]

 

[NFLTrends]

Partisan impeachment all democrats voted for it... bipartisan against it, both democrats and republicans voted against it.

Taking testimony from most people who werent even listening in on the call in any way

Investigation started with someone who knew nothing about the call, never heard the call, never read the transcript, only from what he heard

The only 2 people who were talking on the call, BOTH said nothing wrong was done

The partisan side is limiting witnesses the bipartisan side wants to call, while allowing every witness the partisan side wants to call

Partisan side wont allow the original person who testified to be a witness, you know, the one who started it all

Yeah.... this isnt a sham at all!

FUTURE ABANDONED THREAD to throw in the pile with the hundreds of others

 

[Dafinch]

Partisan impeachment all democrats voted for it... bipartisan against it, both democrats and republicans voted against it.

Taking testimony from most people who werent even listening in on the call in any way

Investigation started with someone who knew nothing about the call, never heard the call, never read the transcript, only from what he heard

The only 2 people who were talking on the call, BOTH said nothing wrong was done

The partisan side is limiting witnesses the bipartisan side wants to call, while allowing every witness the partisan side wants to call

Partisan side wont allow the original person who testified to be a witness, you know, the one who started it all

Yeah.... this isnt a sham at all!

FUTURE ABANDONED THREAD to throw in the pile with the hundreds of others

So, not a single word to contest EITHER post # 37 or # 38, huh? That's what I thought, Roman. Taking the challenge in Post # 38 would be a slam dunk for you if you WEREN'T a fat, fabulist, fuckwad...but, of course, you ARE, aren't you, cabbie driving Blubber Runt? Where's that picture, bitch? Why'd you lie about Vidman, Boulder Head?your namesake was in the news today, peas in a pod, Short Stuff, peas in a pod...Slapping-silly90)):bigfinger:trx-smly0:madasshol

 

[NFLTrends]

So, not a single word to contest EITHER post # 37 or # 38, huh? That's what I thought, Roman. Taking the challenge in Post # 38 would be a slam dunk for you if you WEREN'T a fat, fabulist, fuckwad...but, of course, you ARE, aren't you, cabbie driving Blubber Runt? Where's that picture, bitch? Why'd you lie about Vidman, Boulder Head?your namesake was in the news today, peas in a pod, Short Stuff, peas in a pod...Slapping-silly90)):bigfinger:trx-smly0:madasshol

I responded to the thread with no name calling, no personal insults... and like I predicted earlier, when Try to have an intellectual debate with Dafinch, this happens.....

Cause whatever I answer with is followed by insults that arent true and deflection and you twisting words... Not worth the effort on a pauper who tries to steal for a living.

Example, I said those involved in the call, which were our President and Ukraine President... those were the only 2 involved. YET you try and twist it that those testifying were involved, which they werent... then the usual insults that make no sense, then more insults, then some deflection followed by more insults which make no sense.

Not worth the effort.

Cause whatever I answer with is followed by insults that arent true and deflection and you twisting words... Not worth the effort on a pauper who tries to steal for a living.

Example, I said those involved in the call, which were our President and Ukraine President... those were the only 2 involved. YET you try and twist it that those testifying were involved, which they werent... then the usual insults that make no sense, then more insults, then some deflection followed by more insults which make no sense.

Not worth the effort.

 

[Dafinch]

Intellectual conversation? ROTFLMAO!!!! You don't want to answer the questions below, Blubber Runt, You KNOW what you can do with your "Intellectual conversation," Roman. And, you keep saying it's not worth the effort, but you continue to follow me around into threads, you hypocritical tub of blubber.

So, not a single word to contest EITHER post # 37 or # 38, huh? That's what I thought, Roman. Taking the challenge in Post # 38 would be a slam dunk for you if you WEREN'T a fat, fabulist, fuckwad...but, of course, you ARE, aren't you, cabbie driving Blubber Runt? Where's that picture, bitch? Why'd you lie about Vidman, Boulder Head?your namesake was in the news today, peas in a pod, Short Stuff, peas in a pod...

 

[Dafinch]

It's easy to give sworn testimony when you're swearing that you're only giving your opinion, ass hat. Your .000 average is in no danger of becoming .001 :fckmad::trx-smly0:bigfinger:madasshol^^

Why do you keep slinging that line of shit, you brain dead schmuck? The ONLY one who said that it was their opinion was Sondland, who is trying to tip toe around a perjury charge. Why do you ignore the FIVE people (and, Kent is about to make it six)who were hired by Dump but have testified against him, Jagoff?
ckwadointer:Shush()*Slapping-silly90)):devilex::bigfinger:trx-smly0:madasshol

 

[Dafinch]

He seems to enjoy being the forum pinata

Nothing to say about post # 49, Scumbag? Gee, I wonder why...:think2opcorn-eatinggifazzkick(&^

 

[GasMan]

Nothing to say about post # 49, Scumbag? Gee, I wonder why...:think2opcorn-eatinggifazzkick(&^

Douche
Why do you even try?
You've been humiliated, absolutely destroyed in 100s of threads.
Take your meds.

 

[Dafinch]

Douche
Why do you even try?
You've been humiliated, absolutely destroyed in 100s of threads.
Take your meds.

Run along and give Mrs. Gas Bag 30 seconds of good 'ole Blubber Bellied lovin' on your "yacht," Scumbag. Hey, where's your dumb ass capsizing boat pic, Jagoff?.:think2opcorn-eatinggifointer::madasshol:bigfinger:trx-smly0:Countdown:fckmad:

 

[SheriffJoe]

Solomon is blowing the top off with his invesigating and as usual no one is paying attention.

What a racket.

And these crooks are desperately trying to manufacture evidence against Trump for the same crimes Biden actually committed.

Hilarious.

 

[SheriffJoe]

UPDATE: Adam Schiff’s Star Witness Fiona Hill Has Links to Soros, Deep State, Fusion’s Chris Steele — AND CONVENIENTLY FORGOT ERIC CIARAMELLA’S NAME DURING QUESTIONING

by Jim Hoft November 11, 2019 38 Comments

Corrupt and compulsivec liar Adam Schiff is attempting to unseat the President of the United States Donald Trump using characters like Fiona Hill.

The list of her connections to corrupt players in the Deep State is long and wide.

As reported earlier by Joe Hoft–

As we previously mentioned Roger Stone outed Fiona Hill in 2017 as a Deep State spy in the White House under then NSA Advisor General H. R. McMaster.

​

The George Soros connected traitor was outed by Israeli spies as was reported by Stone at InfoWars.

InfoWars reported on Hill and suggested she may be one of the current deep state anti-Trump “whistleblowers.”

The second White House whistleblower in the Democrats’ Ukraine witch hunt is none other than George Soros operative Fiona Hill, Infowars has learned.

Infowars was contacted by sources close to the president confirming our suspicions that Fiona Hill is definitely one of the so-called White House whistleblowers involved in the current Ukraine witch hunt against President Trump.

Infowars first reported that Hill worked as a mole for Soros when Trump confidante Roger Stone broke the bombshell in May 2017, revealing that Hill was serving as Soros’ mole under the supervision of former NSA adviser H.R. McMaster.

The video below shows Trump confidante Roger Stone in July 2017 warning that he was told he would be “targeted for annihilation” by the FBI for exposing the mole.

Stone was raided by the FBI and arrested in January.

This video was prophetic – simply amazing!

Adam Schiff and the Democrats needed Hill to speak for 11 hours in a recent Deep State interview. Hill had ZERO knowledge of the call President Trump had with the Ukrainian President, and only heard rumors. Democrats don’t care. They want to impeach Trump on rumors.

What a clown show. According to reports Ms. Hill was not even working in the White House at the time of the call with the Ukrainian president on July 25th. Hill resigned before the call.

According to her resume Fiona Hill worked for the George Soros Open Society Institute from 2000-2006, just 13 years ago.

But there’s more –

Hill has connections to Christopher Steele (who is suspected of being a source for Hill’s Vox article). According to people familiar with their relationship, the two British Russia hands are not exactly friends. But they have known each other for years, beginning when Hill was working on Russia at the National Intelligence Council and Steele was on MI6’s Russia desk. “She had a high opinion of Steele, and thought he was very smart,” a foreign policy veteran, and one of Hill’s close friends, told POLITICO. Hill spoke to Steele in 2016 and discussed him with friends in 2017, after BuzzFeed published his memos outlining a potential conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia to win the election.

​

Hill also has past connections to Adam Schiff. Fiona Hill was a speaker, for example, at the Aspen Institute Security Forum in July 2017, an event for which Adam Schiff, now taking her testimony in a closed-door hearing, was also a speaker. This is a pattern with Schiff, given his Aspen participation in July 2018 and meeting with Glenn Simpson of Fusion GPS and dossier fame, who was also in attendance.

Hill also has connections to Professor Joseph Mifsud, the Maltese professor at the center of the storm with George Papadopoulos. Hill has attended the conferences of the Russian Valdai Club, like Spygate principal Joseph Mifsud and his Russian contact Ivan Timofeev. She has done this under the auspices of the Brookings Institution, with which she has been affiliated as a senior fellow and program director for many years.

Hill also has deep ties to Clinton crony, Strobe Talbott (who was a recipient of the Cody Shearer dossier that later became a part of the Steele dossier): Her work at Brookings, where she has stood alongside author collaborator Clifford Gaddy as resident Russia expert since 2009, was under the leadership of long-time Clinton intimate Strobe Talbott, who headed the Institution until 2017.
***Get Trump 2020 buttons @ TrumpButtons.com – Click Here***

And now this…

For some strange reason, Fiona Hill could not remember the Eric Ciaramella’s name during testimony.

It was almost like she was afraid of mentioning his name even though she worked with him on Ukrainian policy.

​

That’s odd.

The Washington Examiner reported:

When former National Security Council official Fiona Hill testifed before the House Intelligence Committee, she said that she could not remember the name of the Ukraine director when she joined the White House.

That person was Eric Ciaramella, the career CIA analyst who is alleged to be the Ukraine whistleblower.

Hill was White House NSC senior director for European and Russian affairs, a position Ciaramella held in an acting capacity while still Ukraine director, for a brief period immediately before she took the post.

Ciaramella, 33, is now a deputy national intelligence officer for Russia and Eurasia on the National Intelligence Council under President Trump’s director of national intelligence, the Washington Examiner previously reported.
​

This woman should never be allowed in government office ever again. She’s a crooked Soros connected traitor.

Period.

Hat tip D. Manny