changing from optimal strategy would cost you a boatload over 100 tournaments. I hope you guys are not doing that. I want you to get close to winning the bet, but I sincerily do not want you to lose money attempting it.
I wondered about that and did some math but realized I forgot one key thing: taking out the initial SNG cost+fee out from the 2nd place profits, duh me.
That said, I am going to post this interesting tidbit --not that anyone should be limping into the money just to win a bet to spite you, WVU-- but the magical number for 6-seaters would be NO MORE than 46 non-cashes for this particular format:
for $35+$3 6-seater SnG (top 2 pays)
1st: $136.50 (65% of prize pool)
2nd: $73.50 (35% of prize pool)
let's say getting 50th 2nd place cashes after exactly 46 non-cashes:
50 2nd cashes at +$35.50 each = $1,775
46 non-cashes at -$38 each = -$1,748
I didn't know that information. If someone decided to take this approach and play only premium cards & be extremely tight-passive in hopes of limping into the money & KNOW they have a potential bet of 10-1 at $100 risked for a profit of $1,000, they might do this way. I know nobody is going to do this as WVU can see/judge for himself but just interesting information anyway.
(I agree with NCAA Specialist that 2nd place out of 6 in the 6-seaters is easier done than 3rd place out of 9/10-seaters, because as mentioned, the blinds are proportionally actually higher in the 9/10-seaters approaching the bubble).
* CalvinTy