Wagerline Team Experts "System"

[BillyWaltersJr+]

So According To Your System, It Would Be 2-6 Today
Yanks Lost
Milw Won
Det Lost
Laa Lost
Wash Lost
Bost Lost
Wsox Won
Seattle Pending
Dodgers Pending
Is This Right?? I'm Curious If I'm Following You!!!!thanks

Correct. It could be that the instance where the top "Team Expert" for both teams have the same team is a good fade. I am not sure, yet. It will take a long time of tracking this "system" to find out.

I will post results for both angles I am looking at later tonight.

 

[1wildturkey]

O.k Just Makin Sure I Was With Ya!!!!!will U Be Posting The Plays Everyday So It Is Easy To Follow???thanks

 

[BillyWaltersJr+]

O.k Just Makin Sure I Was With Ya!!!!!will U Be Posting The Plays Everyday So It Is Easy To Follow???thanks

Yep, I sure will. I may invest the time and effort into make a spreadsheet for people to follow, sooner or later. We'll see.

 

[1wildturkey]

Right On Bro...thanks And I Will Be Following

 

[letgetiton]

I used to track the team experts in baseball that went AGAINST the team they were the experts on. Worked good for a little bit but like almost any other system it went down the drain.

 

[sds23]

Feel absolutely free to use that entire spreadsheet, copy any portions or format techniques, or simply use it as a way to generate ideas for making an improved version for a spreadsheet.

A third line could easily be added underneath the running W~L records for keeping track of daily units....and total units could be kept over on the far left of the spreadsheet underneath the season winning percentage. Just an idea anyway.

I could create a template to show you if I am not explaining it properly or if you are having a hard time envisioning what I mean.

Great stuff Intrinzik!

Well, I have to run.....my oldest son wants to watch a movie and I think he is old enough now that I can finally expose him to one of my all-time favorite movies.....PULP FICTION

I will check back later if I am still feeling awake after the movie. If not, talk to you again tomorrow.

 

[therookie2b1]

I was following this during the NFL season, the only teams I wrote down were the ones that had both #1's listed. I do not have official results but I know that it was a winning system.

 

[BillyWaltersJr+]

I'm going to try fading a WL capper today, just a test run. Below I have listed the plays that WE would play (opposite what the WL capper has posted):

Florida Marlins -130
Braves/Marlins UNDER 9.5 -125
Oakland Athletics +123
Athletics/Yankees UNDER 8.5 -115
Cleveland Indians -140
Indians/Devil Rays UNDER 9.5 -115
St Louis Cardinals -115
Cardinals/Reds OVER 10.5 -110
Philidelphia Phillies -130
Phillies/Mets OVER 11 EV
Pittsburgh Pirates -158
Nationals/Pirates OVER 9 -115
LAA Angels -140
Angels/Orioles UNDER 8 EV
Houston Astros -136
Astros/Rockies OVER 9.5 EV
Texas Rangers +155
Rangers/Red Sox UNDER 11 -110
Chicago White Sox -119
White Sox/Royals UNDER 9.5 +105
Milwaukee Brewers -110
Brewers/Cubs UNDER 8.5 -115
San Franscisco Giants -125
Giants/Diamondbacks UNDER 9.5 -120
Seattle Mariners EV
Mariners/Blue Jays UNDER 9 EV
LA Dodgers -113
Dodgers/Padres OVER 8.5 -120
Minnesota Twins +155
Twins/Tigers UNDER 9.5 -120

 

[BillyWaltersJr+]

I will post the plays for the two systems that this thread was originally created about in a little bit. Busy this morning and only have time to post what I already posted (fade plays).

Back in a bit.

 

[newb411breaker19]

i don't think is a great idea as a lot of these people really are not "team experts".. I think this just another way of saying "variance". There's 30 teams in mlb and with all the cappers posting on that site there are bound to be people with very good or very poor records when playing certain teams.

 

[BillyWaltersJr+]

The plays in green means it won, the plays in red means it lost. The plays that are bolded means that both team experts had the same pick with that game. Total results for both systems are at the bottom.

06/30/07 RESULTS

Oakland Athletics Team Expert: 1* Yankees -158
New York Yankees Team Expert: 1* Yankees -158
Milwaukee Brewers Team Expert: 1* Milwaukee -113
Chicago Cubs Team Expert: 1* Milwaukee -113
New York Mets Team Expert: 1* Phillies +112
Philidelphia Phillies Team Expert: 1* Mets -122
Minnesota Twins Team Expert: 1* Tigers -152
Detroit Tigers Team Expert: 1* Tigers -152
LAA Angels Team Expert: 1* Angels -129
Baltimore Orioles Team Expert: 1* Angels -129
Atlanta Braves Team Expert: 1* Marlins +144
Florida Marlins Team Expert: 1* Braves -154
Colorado Rockies Team Expert: 1* Astros -105
Houston Astros Team Expert: 1* Rockies -105
Washington Nationals Team Expert: 1* Nationals +133
Pittsburgh Pirates team Expert: 1* Nationals +133
Tampa Bay Devil Rays Team Expert: 1* Devil Rays +235
Cleveland Indians Team Expert: 1* Indians -265
Texas Rangers Team Expert: 1* Red Sox -265
Boston Red Sox team Expert: 1* Red Sox -265
Chicago White Sox Team Expert: White Sox +109
Kansas City Royals team Expert: White Sox +109
St Louis Cardinals Team Expert: 1* Reds +101
Cincinnati Reds Team Expert: 1* Cardinals -111
Arizona Diamondbacks Team Expert: 1* Giants -128
San Francisco Giants Team Expert: 1* Diamondbacks +118
Toronto Blue Jays Team Expert: 1* Mariners +131
Seattle Mariners Team Expert: 1* Mariners +131
San Diego Padres Team Expert: 1* Dodgers -102
LA Dodgers Team Expert: 1* Dodgers -102

Record when both experts agree: (3-6, -5.66 units)
Record all together (every play): (12-17, -11.47 units)

 

[BillyWaltersJr+]

07/01/07

Atlanta Braves Team Expert: Marlins -131
Florida Marlins Team Expert: Braves +121
Oakland Athletics Team Expert: Athletics +128
New York Yankees Team Expert: Athletics +128
Tampa Bay Team Expert: Indians -139
Cleveland Indians Team Expert: Devil Rays +129
St Louis Cardinals Team Expert: Cardinals -105
Cincinnati Reds Team Expert: Cardinals -105
LAA Angels Team Expert: Orioles +120
Baltimore Orioles Team Expert: Angels -130
New York Mets Team Expert: Phillies -126
Philidelphia Phillies Team Expert: Mets +116
Washington Nationals Team Expert: Nationals +140
Pittsburgh Pirates Team Expert: Pirates -150

I will post the rest later, as the games go off, so as to allow ample time for each top "Team Expert" to post their pick.

 

[BillyWaltersJr+]

Colorado Rockies Team Expert: Rockies +122
Houston Astros Team Expert: Astros -132
Texas Rangers Team Expert: Rangers +160
Boston Red Sox Team Expert: Rangers +160
Chicago White Sox Team Expert: White Sox -110
Kansas City Royals Team Expert: White Sox -110
Milwaukee Brewers Team Expert: Cubs -116
Chicago Cubs Team Expert: Brewers +106

 

[BillyWaltersJr+]

Arizona Diamondbacks Team Expert: Giants -131
San Francisco Giants Team Expert: Diamondbacks +121
Toronto Blue Jays Team Expert: Mariners -103
Seattle Mariners Team Expert: Mariners -103
San Diego Padres Team Expert: Dodgers -112
LA Dodgers Team Expert: Dodgers -112

 

[Michelangelo]

You're killin' 'em with the Loser Plays and thusfar you're killin' 'em with the dual Team Expert plays too.

Thanks for sharing your work.

 

[BillyWaltersJr+]

Minnesota Twins Team Expert: Twins +162
Detroit Tigers Team Expert: Tigers -172

 

[BillyWaltersJr+]

The plays in green means it won, the plays in red means it lost. The plays that are in bold means that both team experts had the same pick with that game. Total results for both systems are at the bottom.

07/01/07 RESULTS

Atlanta Braves Team Expert: Marlins -131
Florida Marlins Team Expert: Braves +121
Oakland Athletics Team Expert: Athletics +128
New York Yankees Team Expert: Athletics +128
Tampa Bay Team Expert: Indians -139
Cleveland Indians Team Expert: Devil Rays +129
St Louis Cardinals Team Expert: Cardinals -105
Cincinnati Reds Team Expert: Cardinals -105
LAA Angels Team Expert: Orioles +120
Baltimore Orioles Team Expert: Angels -130
New York Mets Team Expert: Phillies -126
Philadelphia Phillies Team Expert: Mets +116
Washington Nationals Team Expert: Nationals +140
Pittsburgh Pirates Team Expert: Pirates -150
Colorado Rockies Team Expert: Rockies +122
Houston Astros Team Expert: Astros -132
Texas Rangers Team Expert: Rangers +160
Boston Red Sox Team Expert: Rangers +160
Chicago White Sox Team Expert: White Sox -110
Kansas City Royals Team Expert: White Sox -110
Milwaukee Brewers Team Expert: Cubs -116
Chicago Cubs Team Expert: Brewers +106
Arizona Diamondbacks Team Expert: Giants -131
San Francisco Giants Team Expert: Diamondbacks +121
Toronto Blue Jays Team Expert: Mariners -103
Seattle Mariners Team Expert: Mariners -103
San Diego Padres Team Expert: Dodgers -112
LA Dodgers Team Expert: Dodgers -112
Minnesota Twins Team Expert: Twins +162
Detroit Tigers Team Expert: Tigers -172

Record when both experts agree: (9-6, +1.22 units)
Record all together (every play): (32-26, +2.19 units)

 

[BillyWaltersJr+]

The plays in green means it won, the plays in red means it lost. Total results for both systems are at the bottom.

07/01/07 WL Capper Fade Results

Florida Marlins -130
Braves/Marlins UNDER 9.5 -125
Oakland Athletics +123
Athletics/Yankees UNDER 8.5 -115
Cleveland Indians -140
Indians/Devil Rays UNDER 9.5 -115
St Louis Cardinals -115
Cardinals/Reds OVER 10.5 -110
Philidelphia Phillies -130
Phillies/Mets OVER 11 EV
Pittsburgh Pirates -158
Nationals/Pirates OVER 9 -115
LAA Angels -140
Angels/Orioles UNDER 8 EV
Houston Astros -136
Astros/Rockies OVER 9.5 EV
Texas Rangers +155
Rangers/Red Sox UNDER 11 -110
Chicago White Sox -119
White Sox/Royals UNDER 9.5 +105
Milwaukee Brewers -110
Brewers/Cubs UNDER 8.5 -115
San Franscisco Giants -125
Giants/Diamondbacks UNDER 9.5 -120
Seattle Mariners EV
Mariners/Blue Jays UNDER 9 EV
LA Dodgers -113
Dodgers/Padres OVER 8.5 -120
Minnesota Twins +155
Twins/Tigers UNDER 9.5 -120

Record: (21-9-0, +11.2 units)

 

[BillyWaltersJr+]

In regards to fading a certain capper on WL, I think the best strategy would be to find out one of the weakest on there, and fade that capper for the ENTIRE season, but start in the middle like I have done. I will continue posting the plays, but starting with football season I will be choosing a select few WL cappers and fading every single one of their plays. There is already a few that I have picked out for each sport (NFL, NCAAF, NHL, etc), as well as a few to fade for the entire year in every sport. It actually didn't take me too long to find one who is down an average of around 3000 units (at $100/unit) each of the past six season. That number is simply astonishing to me, but it is simply what that particular capper has done. Take a minute to think just how much that is, and on a consistent basis (each season that this particular capper has posted his plays for, they have lost 3000 units or more during the course of the entire calendar year in all sports combined).

Back with more later.

 

[letgetiton]

In regards to fading a certain capper on WL, I think the best strategy would be to find out one of the weakest on there, and fade that capper for the ENTIRE season, but start in the middle like I have done. I will continue posting the plays, but starting with football season I will be choosing a select few WL cappers and fading every single one of their plays. There is already a few that I have picked out for each sport (NFL, NCAAF, NHL, etc), as well as a few to fade for the entire year in every sport. It actually didn't take me too long to find one who is down an average of around 3000 units (at $100/unit) each of the past six season. That number is simply astonishing to me, but it is simply what that particular capper has done. Take a minute to think just how much that is, and on a consistent basis (each season that this particular capper has posted his plays for, they have lost 3000 units or more during the course of the entire calendar year in all sports combined).

Back with more later.

So what your telling us is that you found ALAN PALMER, uppy: