Here's the difference between the 2, at least for me. Stallworths' incident was an accident, pure and simple. Over the limit or not, 99.9% of this accident was the fault of the guy who got run over. If Stallworth had blown just under .08, I don't think he would have been charged with anything. What Vick did on the other hand, even though they were dogs, was intentional, deliberate, malicious, savage and heinous. This wasn't a one time incident. This cruelty to animals went on for 6/7 years. There is a BIG DIFFERENCE in these 2 cases for many reasons and Vicks case is by far much worse than Stallworths.
In my opinion there is no excuse for a man of Mike Vicks caliper ,top paid man in the NFL to exhibit behavior such as he did.He should have made better judgement calls.I am sure that he had to know what kind of consequences he would be facing if caught.He made his bed now he is lying in it.
That is a tough one Terps but my answer is yes.Its like in Sierra Leone when those kids were trained to kill innocent villagers(all parts of the world for that matter).They were products of their environment.I am not condoning Vicks actions at all.I dont like dog fighting.I am just saying that on streets all across America youths are growing up with this same mentality,Ive seen it first hand,it is a part of the street culture.A lot of people think its wrong but to some its "natural".