Just stop dude. STOP.
Umm no shit,and I gave evidence to support the cause...
Yea,Green Crack. Shit is all hype,just like Till...
Who is you guys? The majority of the press, the post-fight panel, us in this thread?
You're entitled to your opinion but it's a contrarian 1 so spinning it as we're off our rocker in this thread is just stupid. The prevailing sentiment is echoing what we've said.
I don't really care who you like and don't like, that has nothing to do who won the fight under MMA judging rules.
Lmao the dude ran. Til was the offensive in a fight where he was apparently suppose to get tired.
There is always a narrative to every fight. If that narrative turns out to be false then judges give more credit to the guy who overcame it.
Thompson has no power. Nothing hurt Til. Til dropped him. It would have been robbery if thompson won
There is always a narrative to every fight. If that narrative turns out to be false then judges give more credit to the guy who overcame it.
Thompson has no power. Nothing hurt Til. Til dropped him. It would have been robbery if thompson won
That's fine, but if you're trying to rise to the level of being anything other than the village idiot around here then you should atleast acknowledge that the opinions of those expressed in this thread are the consensus opinion of the fight.
I didn't pull thinking he won out of my ass, the majority of the people covering the fight agreed with me. So just say you disagree with the consensus opinion rather than telling me I'm on crack.
Didn't say it must be accurate but it's worth atleast considering that you are wrong if so many have the opposite view that you do. Not even necessarily that they are wrong, but that their opinion isn't outlandish.
You've made it clear you don't like 1 of the fighters thus that creates a cognitive bias about the result.
Not like I said it was Manny Pacquiao/Timothy Bradley 1, I just said I thought he won the fight and the loss doesn't surprise me because when betting it I had Till getting a decision that most would disagree w/ well within the range of outcomes with the fight being in Liverpool.
You've made it clear you don't like 1 of the fighters thus that creates a cognitive bias about the result.
Not like I said it was Manny Pacquiao/Timothy Bradley 1, I just said I thought he won the fight and the loss doesn't surprise me because when betting it I had Till getting a decision that most would disagree w/ well within the range of outcomes with the fight being in Liverpool.
Cognitive bias is over my head. Lol ok.
He fought like a pussy. There was no bias needed at all. Til is way more dangerous of a fighter...it's not even remotely close. Was the fight close? Sure because neither fighter did a whole lot....but to say Thompson did more than Til is comical. He maybe of landed more I dno but his punches do not have any power.
Usually in a fight you have to get hurt in order to lose. Til was never hurt. Thompson at times no question was.
Their is alwaysssss a group of people who see it differently, especially a fight. And speaking of bias.....there is always a group of people who think they were right when they were wrong and just refuse to come to terms with it.
