**NOTE TO UFC BETTORS: SATURDAYS SHOW HAS A 10AM PST POST TIME FOR THE UNDERCARD DUE TO THE FIGHTS BEING IN ENGLAND. MAIN CARDS FIGHTS GO OFF THE BOARD AT 12PM PST. GOOD LUCK**
Heres my ticket for Saturday 1/19/08
Gouveia -130 **** I think he will dominate this fight everywhere. Lambert is a part time fighter who's only advantage in this fight is strength. At this level you better bring a little bit more to the table.
Hardonk -270 ** Number was off from what I have. Hardonk should dominate this fight standing and get the W. I really wouldn't play this fight at the current numbers unless you were looking to parlay it.
Davis -300 *** Davis has really started to come in to his own and Cris had him under priced at the opener. Number has moved a bit to far again. May be worth a look on a parlay.
Penn -260 **** Penn will dominate this fight standing before the fight eventually hits the floor and he gets a submission victory sometime in the early part of the fight.
Very chalky show and the only dog I really think is live would be Lee who is fight Sakara. Still don't feel comfortable playing the fight though.
Boxing 1/19/08 MSG
Roy Jones Jr. By Decision +235 *** I don't think RJJ has the pop anymore to KO Trinidad and this fight will hit the cards.
Which is why...
Trinidad By Decision +900 *** Also makes sense.
If you can find the Draw 30/1 like it has been some places then it may be a decent bet as both fighters are HBO guys who may be looking to get another fight.
I liked Burkman initially but Swick is going to beat him. Burkman has had his head up his ass for the training camp and will lose to Mike Swick who has his back against the wall.
Swick has never had to deal with a cut to this weight before and I think that will have an effect. Burkman is one of the bigger weight cutters in the game and should be larger than Swick come fight time. Burkman is also the superior wrestler and should control the action IMO. This one should be closer to a pick em as far as I'm concerned.
I don't really get the Swick hype. I know he had a good streak of ending fights early but lost a decision (unanimous) last time out to Okami, a guy who fights pretty similar to Burkman as far as being on top and controlling position. He has wins over journeymen UFC fighters but nothing that makes me think he should be favored in a match where he is dropping a weight class against a bigger wrestler. Burkman's only losses were to Karo (incredible judo), Jon Fitch (incredible wrestler), and Jeremy Horn (incredible jui jitsu). Swick is not going to be incredible at anything IMO. People can say Swick has the jui jitsu to give Burkman problems but he really doesn't have a single impressive submission win. Swick's best bet is a guillotine on a Burkman takedown attempt but Burkman will be too strong to hold IMO.
Okami and Burkman should never be mentioned in the same breath as Okami's skill set is much better than Burkmans. Okami beat Swick due to the size advantage which Burkman WILL NOT have in this fight. Swick did not embarass himself against Okami either as he put up a great effort that made the fight wide open going in to the final stanza.
Your best argument is that Burkman was beaten by great fighters but come on who has he ever beaten? Chad Reiner, Forrest Petz (Who he won a very close decision against), Josh Neer, Sam Morgan, and Drew Fickett are not a list of Hall of Fame MMA Fighters.
Although Swicks resume isn't much better he has dominated and defeated both David Loiseau and Joe Riggs who have competed in the Main Event of past UFC's fighting for titles.
Look for Swick to push the pace here and get in to Burkmans face with a jab which will frustrate Burkman in to taking crazy shots and eventually either getting KO'ed on the way in or landing in a guillotine choke.
I personally can't play this fight to heavy due to all of the question marks surrounding both fighters but there is clearly only one side to play if your going to play it.
Haha we sure seem to disagree on everything. I play a ton of dogs in MMA and have done well and you play a ton of favs (or so it appears) and have done well so we were bound to clash on some of these.