SportSavant said:actually... you played the -1 didnt you CHOP?
also, despite the Final Score, Lucky Leo was right in this one. thats for sure
SportSavant said:actually... you played the -1 didnt you CHOP?
also, despite the Final Score, Lucky Leo was right in this one. thats for sure
C'mon Savant. He was wrong because he lost which is all that matters.
SportSavant said:I know chop, all is cool
actually, that is not all that matters. statistically, Clevland dominated this game, but sometimes the balls dont bounce the way you want them too. It happens every day that the TEAM that deserves to lose actually WINS outright, or COVERS the spread.
In football due to strange anamolies we often see a team DOMINATE time of posession & DOMINATE in TOTAL yards but they lose the game due to a BLOOPER.
sure the people who WON money had the RIGHT side? cause at the end of the day WIN or LOSS is all that counts. but from a TRUE handicapping perspective the team that dominated in the TOTAL yards & TIME of posession was the right side, if they didnt win or COver....
THAT IS WHY THEY CALL IT GAMBLING FOLKS!!!!!
SportSavant said:I know chop, all is cool
actually, that is not all that matters. statistically, Clevland dominated this game, but sometimes the balls dont bounce the way you want them too. It happens every day that the TEAM that deserves to lose actually WINS outright, or COVERS the spread.
In football due to strange anamolies we often see a team DOMINATE time of posession & DOMINATE in TOTAL yards but they lose the game due to a BLOOPER.
sure the people who WON money had the RIGHT side? cause at the end of the day WIN or LOSS is all that counts. but from a TRUE handicapping perspective the team that dominated in the TOTAL yards & TIME of posession was the right side, if they didnt win or COver....
THAT IS WHY THEY CALL IT GAMBLING FOLKS!!!!!