The Republican Chaos Strategy: Obstruct and Blame!! Rely on dumb People.

[JDeuce]

Never said Reagan was responsible for the spending. Just said spending was much higher under Reagan. Spending is spending. And right now we are increasing spending less than anytime in the past 6 decades regardless of who is in control of Congress.

Yeah, actually you did say that. Your stupid graphs show spending under the presidents. Wouldn't spending by whichever party controls the House and Senate be a more appropriate way to display your info?

Saying Reagan spent big is more of the same horseshit from the Left. Just like saying "Bill Clinton was impeached for getting blown." No, he was actually impeached for lying under oath...unless someone can point out which section of the Constitution discusses blow job law...

 

[akphidelt]

Yeah, actually you did say that. Your stupid graphs show spending under the presidents. Wouldn't spending by whichever party controls the House and Senate be a more appropriate way to display your info?

Saying Reagan spent big is more of the same horseshit from the Left. Just like saying "Bill Clinton was impeached for getting blown." No, he was actually impeached for lying under oath...unless someone can point out which section of the Constitution discusses blow job law...

More red herrings. Showing how much spending happened under each president is not saying they wanted to spend that much or little. Simply shows that during his 8 years, the government spent a shit load. During the past 60 years, the government has chosen to increase spending far more than they are now. And there is only one reason why. New age degenerate Republican obstructionism. It's really impossible to argue against the basic facts I've presented. But it's fun watching you losers try. Don't you have to get back to the buffet line?

 

[GasMan]

Yawwwnnnn...already destroyed vit and this BS argument ad hominen he is trying yet he still keeps trying it.

 

[akphidelt]

Yawwwnnnn...already destroyed vit and this BS argument ad hominen he is trying yet he still keeps trying it.

You mean your argument that it's harder to spend money now because the values are larger. Lol. You are really dumb.

 

[GasMan]

There's just honestly no way around it or any way to explain why the last 50 years we have increased government expenditures by over an average of 5% per year until Obama came in to office. It's Republican obstructionism at its finest. Obstruct and blame!!

Wow you are such a hack.

 

[GasMan]

You mean your argument that it's harder to spend money now because the values are larger. Lol. You are really dumb.

Now you make shit up. Never once said it was harder to spend money...it is harder to increase the percentage because the base numbers are larger.

You really dont get it but thats ok.

 

[akphidelt]

Now you make shit up. Never once said it was harder to spend money...it is harder to increase the percentage because the base numbers is larger.

You really dont get it but thats ok.

Haha, I get it perfectly. The fact you keep saying it is the most hilarious thing because it's so obviously wrong. Not even remotely true, haha. Yet you honestly believe it. That's how dumb you are. There is absolutely nothing harder about increasing spending now than it was 100 years ago or 50 years ago or 20 years ago. You're just making shit up.

 

[ballerhanz]

Petty sure it's not a partisan thing. This is the worst Congress in the history of the nation because of Republicans AND Democrats. they're both just equally shit. Be objective for a change. You might like it. And how can you "project" filibusters? The basis of your argument probably shouldn't be things that haven't happened.

 

[akphidelt]

Petty sure it's not a partisan thing. This is the worst Congress in the history of the nation because of Republicans AND Democrats. they're both just equally shit. Be objective for a change. You might like it. And how can you "project" filibusters? The basis of your argument probably shouldn't be things that haven't happened.

Why would I blame the Democrats? They are the ones that want to increase spending and public sector employment. Republicans have drawn a line in the sand for the first time in your lifetime preventing the increases that every other President in the past 6 decades had the luxury of.

Republicans idea of compromise these days is over how much government the Dems are willing to destroy. An argument that no one has had to face in the last 60 years other than Obama.

This is a one sided issue and the data overwhelmingly shows it.

 

[ballerhanz]

Why would I blame the Democrats? They are the ones that want to increase spending and public sector employment. Republicans have drawn a line in the sand for the first time in your lifetime preventing the increases that every other President in the past 6 decades had the luxury of.

Republicans idea of compromise these days is over how much government the Dems are willing to destroy. An argument that no one has had to face in the last 60 years other than Obama.

This is a one sided issue and the data overwhelmingly shows it.

That doesn't make any sense. At least try to be objective.

 

[mountain]

Obstruct and blame!

What is that little O with the red stripes at the top of the chart? It looks like an independent report, generated by a legitimate, independent firm. I guess the rest of your charts are probably from the same source?

 

[akphidelt]

What is that little O with the red stripes at the top of the chart? It looks like an independent report, generated by a legitimate, independent firm. I guess the rest of your charts are probably from the same source?

You can look the data up yourself. It's consistent with the actual data. There's no question that Republicans have stifled spending. The fact you guys are arguing this is hilarious.

 

[akphidelt]

That doesn't make any sense. At least try to be objective.

Just because you don't want to admit it doesn't mean it's not objective. The data speaks for itself. Got to be a really dishonest person to blame that on Dems, lol.

 

[scottcarter]

comparing him to Reagan or anyone else is pointless. Whatever Reagan did back then worked and whatever Obama has done so far hasn't. It is that simple actually. Six years of failure with almost zero accomplishments. Yippie.

AK is like a die-hard NY Jets fan after yesterday. Trying to find a silver lining after the game in San Diego and trying to convince anyone that will listen, that it wasn't as bad it was. And that at least they didn't lose as bad as the Broncos did in the Super Bowl blah blah blah and how the Jets had more passing and rushing yards in the last 2 minutes of the 4th quarter against the Chargers than San diego did. People who actually watched the game know that this is complete nonsense. The same goes for his constant unconditional love and cheer-leading for Obama the last 6 years. Only 2 to go.

 

[russ1945]

Petty sure it's not a partisan thing. This is the worst Congress in the history of the nation because of Republicans AND Democrats. they're both just equally shit. Be objective for a change. You might like it. And how can you "project" filibusters? The basis of your argument probably shouldn't be things that haven't happened.

Good grief their hands are tied. They pass something and pass it on to the Senate where it never sees the light of day. Meanwhile Obama would veto anything that did not fit his agenda. I can't just simply condemn a Congress that has both hands tied behind their backs. Every time they form a committee to look into something they catch flack from the liberal press. It all starts in the WH and that is where the partisan thing starts.

 

[akphidelt]

Good grief their hands are tied. They pass something and pass it on to the Senate where it never sees the light of day. Meanwhile Obama would veto anything that did not fit his agenda. I can't just simply condemn a Congress that has both hands tied behind their backs. Every time they form a committee to look into something they catch flack from the liberal press. It all starts in the WH and that is where the partisan thing starts.

Lol, yea all those abortion, gay marriage, repeal obamacare, and religion bills. Of course they won't pass and Repubs know that. Just wasting peoples time.

 

[akphidelt]

comparing him to Reagan or anyone else is pointless. Whatever Reagan did back then worked and whatever Obama has done so far hasn't. It is that simple actually. Six years of failure with almost zero accomplishments. Yippie.

AK is like a die-hard NY Jets fan after yesterday. Trying to find a silver lining after the game in San Diego and trying to convince anyone that will listen, that it wasn't as bad it was. And that at least they didn't lose as bad as the Broncos did in the Super Bowl blah blah blah and how the Jets had more passing and rushing yards in the last 2 minutes of the 4th quarter against the Chargers than San diego did. People who actually watched the game know that this is complete nonsense. The same goes for his constant unconditional love and cheer-leading for Obama the last 6 years. Only 2 to go.

Nah, it's a change of mentality in the Republican Party. There has always been compromise until these clowns got in power. Even Bob Dole says Reagan and Nixon wouldn't make it in today's party. The worst group of politicians in America since the civil war days. Just atrocious.

 

[ballerhanz]

Lol I wouldn't go around quoting Bill. Well, not if you want people to respect your opinions.

 

[ballerhanz]

Just because you don't want to admit it doesn't mean it's not objective. The data speaks for itself. Got to be a really dishonest person to blame that on Dems, lol.

Your blind allegiance to the Democratic Party is startling. I'm a Republican, but I am mature enough to recognize their mistakes (8 years of Bush - talk about blame, that's all Obama has done for 6 years is blame the previous administration). But see I get that and the next administration will say, it wasn't me...it was the last guy... Dem or Repub. objectivity man. Look it up in a dictionary. I must really be a dishonestly man for placing blame on all politicians regardless of their political affiliations :/. Man, God smite me down.

 

[akphidelt]

Your blind allegiance to the Democratic Party is startling. I'm a Republican, but I am mature enough to recognize their mistakes (8 years of Bush - talk about blame, that's all Obama has done for 6 years is blame the previous administration). But see I get that and the next administration will say, it wasn't me...it was the last guy... Dem or Repub. objectivity man. Look it up in a dictionary. I must really be a dishonestly man for placing blame on all politicians regardless of their political affiliations :/. Man, God smite me down.

Showing 50+ years of data. If anything I want Obama to be able to do what Reagan did. You are really dumb if you haven't figured out my argument yet. It doesn't matter who is president. What works economically is the same. Not sure how you missed it.