The Republican Chaos Strategy: Obstruct and Blame!! Rely on dumb People.

[akphidelt]

Obamanomics
A static economic state in the U.S., where unemployment remains high, gross domestic product remains below a normal median curve, the treasury continues to deflate the dollar by printing more money and President Obama continues to be an anti capitalist in his economic approach.
Obamanomics - During the Obama administration, major manufacturing corporations were taken over by the federal government, banks and large investment firms were given billions of taxpayer dollars and jobs were lost, causing increased unemployment benefits claims. President Obama's approach to cure the situation was to increase spending, borrow more money via treasury bonds, printing more money, reducing the value of the dollar and continue to blame President George W. Bush for the economic downturn.

Well that sounds cool and all, yet data shows that there has been no real significant increase to the money supply.

Obamanomics
"Trickle up poverty". Refers to the economic policies promoted by United States President Barack Obama during his first four months of real experience in US Government. The four pillars of Obama's economic policy are:

1) Increase the growth of government spending,
2) decrease income by increasing tax rates,
3) increase government regulation of the people and economy,
4) increase control of the money supply to increase inflation.
I just lost my job, no thanks to Obamanomics.

Well, I mean all economics is trickle up. How else can people "trickle it down"?

obamanomics
Economic practices of President Barack Obama characterized by confusing stimulus funding that comes with a catch, record deficits that exceed previous 4 year record numbers in just six months and obvious socialism of private business.
Hey dude, the government couldn't sell whores and whiskey in Vegas when they took over the Mustang Ranch and it failed. How they gonna sell cars?

Shut your mouth bitch, thats obamanomics at work.

Well, I mean according to history the changes to our deficit have been really minimal. Just because you fear large numbers like a weirdo doesn't mean it's real.

OBAMANOMICS
When a individual says one thing and does another. Making Americans Jobless. Taking away freedom. Trying to change the Constitution. Leaves Office worse than when he took office. A socialist in demacratic clothing. a unemployment rate in the Multi Millions.
Obama is the perfect example. Also see Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter. Obamanomics the use of lies for future losses.



http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Obamanomics

Pure conjecture. Nothing of substance. Try again.

 

[GasMan]

Remember when you said it's harder to spend money because the values are larger! Now that was economic intelligence if I've ever seen it, lol. You are dumb as fuck!

LIE

Never said it was harder to spend money.

you are a joke.

You ever had a cross check to your chin? 5 minute penalty, probably a 10 misconduct and a game or two suspension.

Best penalty I would ever take to smack a little bitch.

 

[akphidelt]

LIE

Never said it was harder to spend money.

you are a joke.

You ever had a cross check to your chin? 5 minute penalty, probably a 10 misconduct and a game or two suspension.

Best penalty I would ever take to smack a little bitch.

Sure you did weirdo.

Do we really have to go over this shit again? You are using a PERCENTAGE change. The higher the overall spending gets, the harder it is to INCREASE the percentage.

Then you throw in the HUGE INCREASES of 2008-2010, then of course the percentage change is going to go down.

 

[GasMan]

Sure you did weirdo.

Do we really have to go over this shit again? You are using a PERCENTAGE change. The higher the overall spending gets, the harder it is to INCREASE the percentage.

Then you throw in the HUGE INCREASES of 2008-2010, then of course the percentage change is going to go down.

PERCENTAGE DUMB FUCK.

Where the fuck does that say anything about harder to spend money.

You are a fucking trolling assclown faggot. Now go suck a dick loser.

 

[akphidelt]

PERCENTAGE DUMB FUCK.

Where the fuck does that say anything about harder to spend money.

You are a fucking trolling assclown faggot. Now go suck a dick loser.

It's the only logical inference, lol. If it's harder to increase the % it means it's harder to spend more money. You're actually very dumb. I had high hopes for you.

 

[GasMan]

You busted in another lie.

Nice job asswipe.. I really, really don't think you even understand simple math.


Logical inference = logical fallacy.

 

[ballerhanz]

I have a cohesive argument. You haven't said anything other than agreeing with "those guys". So I have nothing else to say but "you guys" since you agree with them. What I have provided so far isn't rocket science. The fact someone attempted to discredit the facts/data I presented by saying it's harder to spend money now because the values are larger, should tell you all you need to know about who I'm working with.

But you are a troll. If you are going to get to me, you are going to have to provide facts. This trolling game playing you are doing, is what I've seen for years. Start being smart or you'll continue being included in "you guys".

I'm not trying to "get at you" and I don't buy into your pseudo-intellectualism. You keep bringing up this point about how someone said it's harder to spend money now because the values are larger, but I've never once said anything even remotely related to that. You call me a troll, yet I stick to the issues we are discussing (in a quasi-respectful manner) and you keep bringing up unrelated shit. Like spending and economics and other shit about which we have never had a meaningful discourse.

 

[akphidelt]

You busted in another lie.

Nice job asswipe.. I really, really don't think you even understand simple math.


Logical inference = logical fallacy.

You've confused "harder" with "larger". It's take a larger amount of money now to increase the % compared to the past. That does not make it harder. Just means you need to spend a larger amount. You are really dumb.

 

[akphidelt]

I'm not trying to "get at you" and I don't buy into your pseudo-intellectualism. You keep bringing up this point about how someone said it's harder to spend money now because the values are larger, but I've never once said anything even remotely related to that. You call me a troll, yet I stick to the issues we are discussing (in a quasi-respectful manner) and you keep bringing up unrelated shit. Like spending and economics and other shit about which we have never had a meaningful discourse.

You haven't said anything remotely related to the topic. Nice try though.

 

[ballerhanz]

You haven't said anything remotely related to the topic. Nice try though.

Lol do you even know what you're talking about anymore? You keep oscillating between non-sensual, incompatible positions

 

[akphidelt]

Lol do you even know what you're talking about anymore? You keep oscillating between non-sensual, incompatible positions

Read through your posts and then apologize. You're just trolling. I've seen this game many times before.

 

[ballerhanz]

Read through your posts and then apologize. You're just trolling. I've seen this game many times before.

When if I was, which I'm not, there's a reason for it. Those trolls don't leave their birdges for no reason.

 

[akphidelt]

When if I was, which I'm not, there's a reason for it. Those trolls don't leave their birdges for no reason.

I don't even think you know what you're talking about. Just some cryptic weird attempt to get to me. Seen it before. You've watched V for Vendetta one too many times. Either make a point or continue being part of the "you guys".

 

[Dave007inVegas]

Read through your posts and then apologize. You're just trolling. I've seen this game many times before.

There it is.

 

[ballerhanz]

I don't even think you know what you're talking about. Just some cryptic weird attempt to get to me. Seen it before. You've watched V for Vendetta one too many times. Either make a point or continue being part of the "you guys".

You might want to see someone about your megalomania and schizophrenia. You have some bizarre and twisted notions about your importance and thinking that everyone is out to get you.

 

[Dave007inVegas]

You might want to see someone about your megalomania and schizophrenia. You have some bizarre and twisted notions about your importance and thinking that everyone is out to get you.

Only the sane among us.

 

[akphidelt]

You might want to see someone about your megalomania and schizophrenia. You have some bizarre and twisted notions about your importance and thinking that everyone is out to get you.

Your game playing is weak. Let me know when you have something of substance to say. At least Dave likes you. He's a really solid human being, lol

 

[akphidelt]

Former Ronald Reagan top economic adviser Martin Feldstein apparently understands economics. Very difficult decision... do we listen to real economists or resident RX loons? Very difficult.

-----------------------------

CAMBRIDGE, Mass. —

To get the economy back on track, President Obama should propose, and Congress should enact, a five-year fiscal package that would move the growth of gross domestic product to above 3 percent a year and focus on direct government spending on infrastructure.


Although the mission of the military has been reduced with the end of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, there is also substantial need to replace and repair the equipment of the armed forces. Some of this aid could also extend to state and local governments.


The total price tag over five years would have to exceed $1 trillion to achieve the needed rise in the economic growth rate. The lack of “shovel-ready” projects is not an excuse for not pursuing this strategy or for diverting the funds into income transfers and other low-impact spending of the kind that made the 2009 stimulus so ineffective. It would be better to spend a year or two preparing for the right kind of spending.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/09/opinion/saving-the-fed-from-itself.html?partner=rss&emc=rss&_r=1&

 

[akphidelt]

 

[akphidelt]