I actually don't think there was a single person that bet a large percentage of their bankroll on Nuggets moneyline. In fact I bet all of us bet Nuggets +7ish large or medium sized and won. I know I did, even though I wanted Denver to win outright to watch Lang hide tomorrow and get what his scamming ass deserves.
Well one thing his 900 dime at risk bet proved is what a joke of a "handicapper" he truly is. They should at least make him change that motto of his on that shit site.
I guess this is Lang's new strategy. Shit his pants for a few months and then come with some ridiculous money line wager where he has double the amount he's lost at risk.
After 950 Dimes at risk I think it would be funny as shit if Lang came with only a 5 dime play on Thursday.
Most likely. I unfortunately did one unit on each of his other fades, one on +7, then 2.5 units on the nuggets ml.
Tough loss, one of the worst i've had all year, but still a winning day.
I agree Pimpy he should change his motto, but we know he won't. Either way, Langer's reputation is already tarnished by his own doing. It wouldn't surprise me if he didn't have literally 5 clients who are betting his plays. Obviously, anyone who was betting his plays wouldn't have the funds to bet 900 "dimes" on OKC. Anyone who is monitoring him now knows he's a scumbag.
Hell, if you type "Brandon Lang" in on google the very first result is a thread at another website devoted to documenting his losing. Tonight was a new low for him though. He offically has picked up all the tactics of Stu Feiner. First, selling plays for absurd amounts no one bought, and mysteriously winning almost all of them. And now, betting an absurd amount on a -325 moneyline of all things, chasing monumental losses.
Langer could finish the nba playoffs 15-0, and he'd still have no respect. His reputation is literally beyond repair at this point.
BRANDON LANG
BACK @ BRANDONLANG.COM (1/7/11)
62-74, -234 Dimes
__________________________________________________
PUMPKINHEAD RESULTS for 4/27
300 DIMES / THUNDER (ML) -300 / WINNER
100 DIMES / THUNDER WIN SERIES -220 / WINNER
25 DIMES / HEAT -10 / LOSER
25 DIMES / ANGELS (RL) +120 / LOSER
TOTAL: +347.5 DIMES
__________________________________________________
PUMPKINHEAD For The Week: 4/26 to 5/2
TUE: -109 DIMES
WED: +347.5 DIMES
THU:
FRI:
SAT:
SUN:
MON:
This Week Total: +238.5 DIMES
Last Week Total: -63.25 DIMES
2 Weeks Ago: -8.5 DIMES
3 Weeks Ago: -45 DIMES
___________________________________________________
Lang's complete record for 2011 is
66-77, -188.75 DIMES
___________________________________________________
Lang For April
20-28, -156.25 DIMES
___________________________________________________
April Dimes
300 DIME: 1-0
150 DIME: 0-1
100 DIME: 1-0
120 DIME: 0-1
50 DIME: 0-4
40 DIME: 1-0
30 DIME: 5-3
25 DIME: 1-4
20 DIME: 6-6
15 DIME: 0-2
10 DIME: 5-6
05 DIME: 0-1
___________________________________________________
Lang by Month
March: 16-18, +12.5 DIMES
February: 16-14, -73 DIMES
January: 14-17, +28 DIMES
___________________________________________________
BACK @ BRANDONLANG.COM (1/7/11)
62-74, -234 Dimes
__________________________________________________
PUMPKINHEAD RESULTS for 4/27
300 DIMES / THUNDER (ML) -300 / WINNER
100 DIMES / THUNDER WIN SERIES -220 / WINNER
25 DIMES / HEAT -10 / LOSER
25 DIMES / ANGELS (RL) +120 / LOSER
TOTAL: +347.5 DIMES
__________________________________________________
PUMPKINHEAD For The Week: 4/26 to 5/2
TUE: -109 DIMES
WED: +347.5 DIMES
THU:
FRI:
SAT:
SUN:
MON:
This Week Total: +238.5 DIMES
Last Week Total: -63.25 DIMES
2 Weeks Ago: -8.5 DIMES
3 Weeks Ago: -45 DIMES
___________________________________________________
Lang's complete record for 2011 is
66-77, -188.75 DIMES
___________________________________________________
Lang For April
20-28, -156.25 DIMES
___________________________________________________
April Dimes
300 DIME: 1-0
150 DIME: 0-1
100 DIME: 1-0
120 DIME: 0-1
50 DIME: 0-4
40 DIME: 1-0
30 DIME: 5-3
25 DIME: 1-4
20 DIME: 6-6
15 DIME: 0-2
10 DIME: 5-6
05 DIME: 0-1
___________________________________________________
Lang by Month
March: 16-18, +12.5 DIMES
February: 16-14, -73 DIMES
January: 14-17, +28 DIMES
___________________________________________________
I hear ya, I was mad at myself for being a chicken almost the whole game. Having said that, there's no way I would bet 300 dimes worth on one particular game if my regular bet is around 20-50 dimes worth. It's like suicide in gambling.
The irony of this is that Link actually lost whatever creditably he has left even he won. LOL
ROFL.............
My Rating System
My ratings system is pretty simple. I personally play every game I release. I truly believe it's not fair to my clients if I am not going to war with them too. I keep it very basic so you will always know where I stand with wins and losses and current bankroll.
In February of 2006 I decided to reign in my ratings, generally going between 5 and 100 dimes to aide clients in money management. I have a responsibility to manage your bankroll. Of course I have no control over when customers become customers, but when I sense an opportunity to go for the jugular, I don't pass it up as long as I remain steadfast to my money management principles and bankroll allocation.
You have two ways of looking at my ratings. The first is based on the amount of your maximum wager size. The second is based on the amount of your total bankroll.
Maximum Wager Size Rules
Let's say your maximum wager size is $200. Well, if I release a 100 dime play, then it should be a $200 wager. If I release a 30 dime play, it should be a $60 wager. Taking it one step further, if I release a 50 dime pick, it should be a $100 wager.
Total Bankroll Size Rules
In this scenario, let's say your total bankroll for a day (the amount you can afford to lose in a worst-case situation) is $500.
On this day, I have a 50 Dime release, a pair of 20 dime plays, and two more 5 dime picks. Add those up and you'll see I have 100 dimes of TOTAL action.
Now, take the $500 bankroll and divide it by 100 dimes. The math shows you each dime is worth $5.
So, a 50 dime play is worth 50 x $5 which equals $250 dollars from your original $500 bankroll.
The two 20 dimes plays are each worth $100 each (remember $5 x 20 dimes).
The 5 Dime plays are each worth $25 (remember $5 x 5 dimes).
Do the math...$250 + $100 + $100 + $25 + $25 = $500.50 (which was your original bankroll)
Total Bankroll Size Rules for Long-Term Players
Obviously, the key here is YOU have to decide what portion of your bankroll you can afford to lose each betting day for the length of your package. Call it "bankroll rationing" if you will.
Maybe you like betting the NFL more than college. Then, in this case, you'd want to allocate more to Sunday's card than Saturday's.
The bottom line is you want to have action throughout the length of the package, whether it be 7, 30, 60 or 100 days. So, it's up to YOU to decide how much action you want on given days and on particular sports.
My Rating System
My ratings system is pretty simple. I personally play every game I release. I truly believe it's not fair to my clients if I am not going to war with them too. I keep it very basic so you will always know where I stand with wins and losses and current bankroll.
In February of 2006 I decided to reign in my ratings, generally going between 5 and 100 dimes to aide clients in money management. I have a responsibility to manage your bankroll. Of course I have no control over when customers become customers, but when I sense an opportunity to go for the jugular, I don't pass it up as long as I remain steadfast to my money management principles and bankroll allocation.
HOW TO USE THE DIME MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
Once again, money management is the key to winning, knowing what percentage of your bankroll to play on each release. But, first and foremost, always remember to never wager more than you can afford to lose. This is the single biggest problem gamblers make, and that's why I hammer this point home year after year because I feel it's my job to educate as well, no different than what a financial advisor would do for you when purchasing stocks or mutual funds.
You have two ways of looking at my ratings. The first is based on the amount of your maximum wager size. The second is based on the amount of your total bankroll.
Maximum Wager Size Rules
Let's say your maximum wager size is $200. Well, if I release a 100 dime play, then it should be a $200 wager. If I release a 30 dime play, it should be a $60 wager. Taking it one step further, if I release a 50 dime pick, it should be a $100 wager.
Total Bankroll Size Rules
In this scenario, let's say your total bankroll for a day (the amount you can afford to lose in a worst-case situation) is $500.
On this day, I have a 50 Dime release, a pair of 20 dime plays, and two more 5 dime picks. Add those up and you'll see I have 100 dimes of TOTAL action.
Now, take the $500 bankroll and divide it by 100 dimes. The math shows you each dime is worth $5.
So, a 50 dime play is worth 50 x $5 which equals $250 dollars from your original $500 bankroll.
The two 20 dimes plays are each worth $100 each (remember $5 x 20 dimes).
The 5 Dime plays are each worth $25 (remember $5 x 5 dimes).
Do the math...$250 + $100 + $100 + $25 + $25 = $500.50 (which was your original bankroll)
Total Bankroll Size Rules for Long-Term Players
Obviously, the key here is YOU have to decide what portion of your bankroll you can afford to lose each betting day for the length of your package. Call it "bankroll rationing" if you will.
Maybe you like betting the NFL more than college. Then, in this case, you'd want to allocate more to Sunday's card than Saturday's.
The bottom line is you want to have action throughout the length of the package, whether it be 7, 30, 60 or 100 days. So, it's up to YOU to decide how much action you want on given days and on particular sports.
Wow, who didn't see Lang's 100 Dime Hawks "Not Really A Hedge" play coming today?
Once again Lang stealing a 1/2 point as the line on the Hawks is +2. Stealing a point to a 1/2 point on the under total.
I don't know what's going on with the Mets game. It was posted across the street as Mets +160 so I assumed run line but something looks fucked up.
Once again Lang stealing a 1/2 point as the line on the Hawks is +2. Stealing a point to a 1/2 point on the under total.
I don't know what's going on with the Mets game. It was posted across the street as Mets +160 so I assumed run line but something looks fucked up.
