Saturday Service Play Thread 02/15/2020

[SportsBookData]

so if you subscribe to there service why are you asking for the plays? What am I missing here?

Like the many others here, I ask before I pay to see if anyone else is going to contribute to the forum. I have bought and posted many times. Most likely I will be re-upping my 1 Year All Access subscription in the next week or so in time for March Madness.

Now that I have answered do you have any Picks to offer the forum?

 

[lionelhutz]

sportsbookdata: I can assure you I am not a competitor or a tout. I can only speak to Britney Deluca's abilities as a capper which are questionable at best. For a straight month her winning % was in the teens. For my the money I paid for these picks I got the reward of another free month of losing picks instead of my money back which i figured would be a small token of integrity. I figure 2 months of daily losing is a good enough sample for most. Her style is that she posts picks on NBA/college totals early in the day which should be the real "red flag" since the starting lineups have not even been set or confirmed. Personally I am just trying to save some people in this forum some money by avoiding her. Yes I did just sign up but have been reading posts for years.

 

[sailfish]

Maddux

10 603 Oklahoma +11.5
10 613 St. Josephs +18
10 661 FIU/Southern Miss over 143.5
10 663 Arkansas Little Rock +2.5
10 665 Arkansas State +9.5
10 670 Northern Illinois/Miami OH under 134
10 677 Appalachian State +5.5
10 763 Cal Northridge +3
10 785 Tennessee Tech +10

 

[CADILLACJACK]

Interesting, how long were you with them? Just curious because my experiences have been very different. I have been with that site for a couple of years now and have never won more.

The guy you responded to just signed up to bash them... this is usually a "red flag" in my eyes, perhaps a competitor trying to discredit someone they may be threatened by. It happens here all the time so I would be careful feeding into it.

What I learned many years ago, after being burnt through trial and error, is to only rely on your own due diligence. Look at the big picture too. Too many people try a service for a day and lose and automatically they bash, saying they suck. This is unfair to the service and the basher because 1 day, or even a short time, doesn't make a hero or a dud. When I do due diligence I look at how long they have been in business, long-term consistency in performance and 100% transparency. There are not many services that provide these 3 things but I found 3 or 4 that do and have stuck with them for years now.

For 1 year....it was an awful experience....speaking of Brittney....don't know about the others but assume same BS. Would never recommend or go back

 

[richie69]

Interesting, how long were you with them? Just curious because my experiences have been very different. I have been with that site for a couple of years now and have never won more.

The guy you responded to just signed up to bash them... this is usually a "red flag" in my eyes, perhaps a competitor trying to discredit someone they may be threatened by. It happens here all the time so I would be careful feeding into it.

What I learned many years ago, after being burnt through trial and error, is to only rely on your own due diligence. Look at the big picture too. Too many people try a service for a day and lose and automatically they bash, saying they suck. This is unfair to the service and the basher because 1 day, or even a short time, doesn't make a hero or a dud. When I do due diligence I look at how long they have been in business, long-term consistency in performance and 100% transparency. There are not many services that provide these 3 things but I found 3 or 4 that do and have stuck with them for years now.

Would you mind sharing who those 3 or 4 services are?

 

[sailfish]

Wayne Root

Perfect Play—Baylor-6
Inner Circle—Rutgers-3.5
Pinnacle—-Alabama-2

 

[HowBoutThemCowboys!]

Shaker: 644 Iowa St. / 643 Texas Under 136.5 Bookmaker​

dime bet​

Analysis:1* Play at your best number down to 133..



Nover

705 George Washington 7.0 (-110) 5Dimes vs 706 George Mason​

dime bet​

Analysis:
George Washington defeated George Mason, 73-67, as three-point home 'dogs during the first meeting. I see the Colonials holding their own inside, which is a key. Neither team is strong offensively so this is too many points.


George Mason hasn't broken the 67-point barrier in four of its last five games. The Patriots still could be on Cloud Nine after upsetting VCU, 72-67, as 14-point road 'dogs this past Wednesday. Previous to that game, though, the Patriots had dropped four in a row. They are 2-8-1 ATS in their last 11 games.




Spartan

743 Tennessee 4.0 (-110) Sportsbook.ag vs 744 S.Carolina O'Donnell ​ 695 Louisville -5.0 (-110) Bookmaker vs 696 Clemson​ double-dime bet​ Analysis:[FONT=&quot]Tigers are 2-5 ATS in their last 7 games overall. AS WE SEE HUGE VALUE TO THE CARD OF

LOUISVILLE[FONT=&quot] - 5.... POWER RATED AT -10 WE WILL CALL FOR A 81-71 WIN HERE AT 4PM TODAY VS THE TIGERS ....[/FONT] [FONT=&quot]VILLE 4-0 LAST 4 ATS AND 3-1 IN THIS SPOT TODAY ....[/FONT] [FONT=&quot][/FONT] [FONT=&quot]TIGERS CATCH THE CARDS AFTER A TERRIBLE LOSS LAST GAME VS THE GEOTEC[/FONT][FONT=&quot]H JACKETS A SUPER FLAT SPOT FOR THE VILLE LAST GAME ......... THEY COME OUT ON FIRE TODAY ..[/FONT] VILLE TO CRUSH

dime bet ​

[/FONT]


AJ Hoffman Dime Bet:

AJ HOFFMAN | CBB SIDES	SAT, 02/15/20 - 8:00 PM
765 Seton Hall -2.0 (-110) William Hill vs 766 Providence​

 

[sailfish]

Greg Shaker
807 Arizona - 808 Stanford UNDER 135.0 triple-dime bet

 

[flashover209]

Marco? TIA

 

[MGMan]

Just so everyone realizes that is not Novers GOY as that is in the Big 12

 

[SportsBookData]

Would you mind sharing who those 3 or 4 services are?

I have stated who I use many times but will again since you asked.

I use Winning Sports Plays (Football, Basketball, Soccer), MTi (NFL, NBA), Killer Sports (Football), Marc Lawrence (Football).

The common denominators are they all have been in business a long time and they are all trend players, which I like, but each has their own unique style of reaching their final recommendations. The trends they base picks on are not the typical ones most access publicly, they are very in depth trends that involve players and situations. In my opinion it's the closest you get to "inside information" (not widely known by the general public).

Winning Sports Plays consists of J.R. Stevens, Britney DeLuca and Arian Bhardi. J.R. Stevens plays mostly underdogs, Britney DeLuca mostly totals and Arian Bhardi is soccer only. For me, they compliment one another so I typically subscribe to their 1 Year All Access pass. J.R. Stevens is great in all sports and his big plays are money. Britney DeLuca's Banger plays are incredible and not sure any other service can even come close to her win percentages. It is these picks I mostly play. Arian Bhardi is one of the best soccer guys I have ever seen and he got me really enjoying it because my past experiences weren't too good.

The other services I mentioned are pretty straight forward and self explanatory since they are individual cappers.

Hopefully this helps you in some way and, remember, always do your own due diligence and make sure whoever you work with is a good fit for you. And also remember, everyone has good streaks and bad but it's long term consistency that makes the great ones great!

 

[jrgold1124]

Like the many others here, I ask before I pay to see if anyone else is going to contribute to the forum. I have bought and posted many times. Most likely I will be re-upping my 1 Year All Access subscription in the next week or so in time for March Madness.

Now that I have answered do you have any Picks to offer the forum?

listen NOOB you just came to this forum over the summer, I have posted more plays here from cappers over many years! You say you have an All Access pass to that site, so NO you didn’t answer my question because if you did, you could dispute the poster YOU called out over Brittanys plays. Also if NO one posts the plays after you ask then why don’t you post them with your All Access pass? You call the guy out here as a competitor but can’t show proof he is wrong. So I call bullshit on you!

 

[whoshot]

What the fuck who are the plays in green

 

[JDawg311]

Quit gabbing and post plays! This forum has degraded into a joke.

Someone grab Chris Jordan or Valentino.

 

[jrgold1124]

Quit gabbing and post plays! This forum has degraded into a joke.

Someone grab Chris Jordan or Valentino.

why don’t you grab em?

 

[JDawg311]

why don’t you grab em?

got 2 already stfu

 

[whoshot]

Bunch of losers here

 

[jrgold1124]

got 2 already stfu

ok because you asked so nicely lol go bet your $10 on games lol

 

[letitride112]

Dave Essler - 3* Sec GOY

S Carolina -3

Analysis:
Probably -3 shows eventually without buying but regardless I always want the best number on any game. South Carolina is always a tough out at home, regardless, and more so against teams that motivate them. They beat Kentucky here, and they lost to Tennessee by just one earlier this season, so motivation isn't a problem. In that game they shot 15% from behind the are and only 37% inside, so they probably should have been crushed. If they can play that bad on offense and only lost by one, I love the chances here. South Carolina has the #1 defense in the SEC, and since that loss the Gamecocks have only lost at Auburn and at Mississippi, two games they figured to lose anyway, If they win the games they should between now and Tournament they will finish fourth and have a first round bye, and quite possibly make the Big Dance, whereas that path for the Vols is realistically unlikely. The Gamecocks are quite young, so their play lately is a result of gaining experience, which you'd also expect. They've got the length to play with Tennessee and are a better rebounding team. Minaya may be out again, but they're had three games without him to settle the rotation, and haven't mi°ssed a beat. James may be back for the Vols, the only A team they've beaten this season is Alabama. South Carolina has beaten three A teams(or ranked such at the time) - Arkansas,Clemson, and UVA, all on the road. The Vols are a B team with a shorter bench which will ultimately be their downfall trying to keep up with the faster Gamecocks. That's all I got.

 

[JDawg311]

ok because you asked so nicely lol go bet your $10 on games lol

add a couple more 0s - and I looked at your post history, about as pathetic as it gets