Saturday Service Play Thread 02/15/2020

[Ahhting]

Ever since the moderator was busy doing other things, many guys, mostly new members, came here to post some rubbish and hurt other members who bought and posted the picks here at the rx service plays forum.

Sounds then like if this board is going to have any future life, moderators need to pay more attention. I only found you guys about late October but it does seem to be going downhill fast going from Handicapper posts' to shit talking.

 

[Bigdog4Life]

Money well spent I guess lol...Easy win dbanana0-9

 

[METFAN]

Thanks, I'm fading big time.

How did that turn out?

 

[SportsBookData]

listen NOOB you just came to this forum over the summer, I have posted more plays here from cappers over many years! You say you have an All Access pass to that site, so NO you didn’t answer my question because if you did, you could dispute the poster YOU called out over Brittanys plays. Also if NO one posts the plays after you ask then why don’t you post them with your All Access pass? You call the guy out here as a competitor but can’t show proof he is wrong. So I call bullshit on you!

You clearly need to reduce the amount of testosterone in your diet and you also need to start reading instead of reacting!

I said that I am going to re-up my 1 Year All Access membership in time for March Madness... in the meantime, I have been buying the one day passes on the days there are big plays.

No go look at yourself and the mirror and reflect on your aggressive behavior because your unresolved mommy and daddy issues have nothing to do with me!

 

[SportsBookData]

Thank you for your response.

Sonce this is a service play thread, I don’t want to clutter but I must respectfully very much disagree with your statement that Winning Sports Plays has been in business for a long time.

Along with their constant use of “game of the year” labels on top of being “independently” audited would raise a red flag to most.

Best of luck.

I am not sure where you are getting your information from but Winning Sports Plays has been on the web since 2004 (16 YEARS) and this is public information that is easy to verify.

On their website they state how they rank their picks. "Game of the Year" is just an indication of their highest rated pick. They have them maybe once a week on average based on my time with them. And honestly, I don't care if a service ranks their picks based a gazillion star system as long as they state their ratings clearly so I understand what they mean and know how to apply them to my personal account.

Their picks are completely transparent which means they show all picks publicly immediately after the games start and they always show their entire history for every sport.

Transparency is very big for me and I consider myself the best "auditor" because I reconcile my account daily with their site and I can assure you there has never been a problem during my time with them.

Again, do your own due diligence and make sure your information is accurate and reliable. And once you verify important things like how long they have been in business, etc. then ask yourself "does this service compliment my style of play?". For example, if you like playing totals mostly find a service that specializes in totals, or if you like to play underdogs find a service that specializes in underdogs, etc. Being aligned in your style of play is one of the most important keys to succeeding at this and having positive experiences with services instead of negative.

Lastly, here is the #1 thing I always hear from my friends who use services. "They suck and lost me a lot of money". Although this might be true in some cases what I have learned is the service isn't always to blame. So I always ask my friends who complain, "did you play all of their picks exclusively or did you only play some and mix them with your own?". The answer I always get is "I only played some and mixed them with my own". If these people are not playing the services picks exclusively how is it fair to blame the service for their losses? Understand what I'm saying?

Anyway, good luck with your journey of sports betting and I hope you gained something out of this exchange.

 

[CADILLACJACK]

I am not sure where you are getting your information from but Winning Sports Plays has been on the web since 2004 (16 YEARS) and this is public information that is easy to verify.

On their website they state how they rank their picks. "Game of the Year" is just an indication of their highest rated pick. They have them maybe once a week on average based on my time with them. And honestly, I don't care if a service ranks their picks based a gazillion star system as long as they state their ratings clearly so I understand what they mean and know how to apply them to my personal account.

Their picks are completely transparent which means they show all picks publicly immediately after the games start and they always show their entire history for every sport.

Transparency is very big for me and I consider myself the best "auditor" because I reconcile my account daily with their site and I can assure you there has never been a problem during my time with them.

Again, do your own due diligence and make sure your information is accurate and reliable. And once you verify important things like how long they have been in business, etc. then ask yourself "does this service compliment my style of play?". For example, if you like playing totals mostly find a service that specializes in totals, or if you like to play underdogs find a service that specializes in underdogs, etc. Being aligned in your style of play is one of the most important keys to succeeding at this and having positive experiences with services instead of negative.

Lastly, here is the #1 thing I always hear from my friends who use services. "They suck and lost me a lot of money". Although this might be true in some cases what I have learned is the service isn't always to blame. So I always ask my friends who complain, "did you play all of their picks exclusively or did you only play some and mix them with your own?". The answer I always get is "I only played some and mixed them with my own". If these people are not playing the services picks exclusively how is it fair to blame the service for their losses? Understand what I'm saying?

Anyway, good luck with your journey of sports betting and I hope you gained something out of this exchange.

Bottom line if it's working for YOU and YOU'RE making money that's what counts. GL

 

[Orso72]

dave essler - 3* sec goy

s carolina -3

analysis:
probably -3 shows eventually without buying but regardless i always want the best number on any game. South carolina is always a tough out at home, regardless, and more so against teams that motivate them. They beat kentucky here, and they lost to tennessee by just one earlier this season, so motivation isn't a problem. In that game they shot 15% from behind the are and only 37% inside, so they probably should have been crushed. If they can play that bad on offense and only lost by one, i love the chances here. South carolina has the #1 defense in the sec, and since that loss the gamecocks have only lost at auburn and at mississippi, two games they figured to lose anyway, if they win the games they should between now and tournament they will finish fourth and have a first round bye, and quite possibly make the big dance, whereas that path for the vols is realistically unlikely. The gamecocks are quite young, so their play lately is a result of gaining experience, which you'd also expect. They've got the length to play with tennessee and are a better rebounding team. Minaya may be out again, but they're had three games without him to settle the rotation, and haven't mi°ssed a beat. James may be back for the vols, the only a team they've beaten this season is alabama. South carolina has beaten three a teams(or ranked such at the time) - arkansas,clemson, and uva, all on the road. The vols are a b team with a shorter bench which will ultimately be their downfall trying to keep up with the faster gamecocks. That's all i got.

*loser*

 

[SportsBookData]

Bottom line if it's working for YOU and YOU'RE making money that's what counts. GL

This might be the smartest thing said on this forum since I've been here! Glad someone gets it!

 

[HowBoutThemCowboys!]

Loser by 1 point, and probably should have had it ... Hey, nobody's perfect

Loser by 1 point, and probably should have had it ... Hey, nobody's perfect

winning 6 of 10 should be the goal

*loser*