Do you play a few big ones or a lot of little ones?
How much lineup variance do you have ?
Do you have a core of players in every lineup?
Do you play big pools, small pools, heads up, or all 3?
1. I scale out from $5 to 50 in the 50/50's usually, can't post below that because I've reached certain threshold on both sites. If I could I would though, the lower the stakes the better the ROI for the most part. I post h2h much higher but tough to get too many taken at higher stakes.
2. The way I hedge against variance is by playing multiple slates. 1pm only, main slate, thursday to monday slate, sunday/monday slate on both sites. So you get naturally hedging this way. But I do think you need the best optimal lineup every slate, or atleast to strive for that. Hedging was fine back in '14-16 when the ROI was bigger and you could give up some EV to reduce variance, but I think the games are too competitive to do that now. Although a lot of reg players still do it.
3. Yeah, obviously some guys are just smash value and are in every lineup. Gio Bernard this week vs Atlanta, their defense just funnels receptions to RB's all game and he is a pretty good receiver. There are guys you will have 100% exposure to. Just hope they don't twist an ankle first quarter.
4. I dabble in GPP's but I mostly play cash games/scale out action. I hate to say "You can't beat this" because obviously people do it but at 18% rake and tons of regs putting in 150 lineups nowadays, I do think the edge is small in NFL large scale GPP's. I just stay more engaged this way, I can't really be heavy GPP and lose 3-4 weeks in a row waiting for a big score. Some people do it and they do it really well, but I'd rather just grind.