not mentioning he bought it down...like Drunkguy says anyone who got caught doesn`t belong playing...Get over yourself Frog...
Instead of being happy you won, you start a bunch of shiat for no reason....we saw you coming from the bullpen!
Still not sure who you are but your agenda did surface lol
Instead of being happy you won, you start a bunch of shiat for no reason....we saw you coming from the bullpen!
Still not sure who you are but your agenda did surface lol
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR> it's not the # of posts.
it the time you have been here. buddy <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
sorry...neither of these get my vote...it is the intelligence & wit behind the post that I enjoy & look forward too....
VegasVic in the NHL forum is one of my favorite posters to read yet he has been here only a very short time with very few posts....I would read his posts over other's who have been here for years....anyday.
it the time you have been here. buddy <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
sorry...neither of these get my vote...it is the intelligence & wit behind the post that I enjoy & look forward too....
VegasVic in the NHL forum is one of my favorite posters to read yet he has been here only a very short time with very few posts....I would read his posts over other's who have been here for years....anyday.
the lakers were the wrong side end of story. . buying points makes it another play all together. the posted play lost. omnivorous is right. it isnt cool to to encourage everyone to follow your lead, when the play you post isnt the one you are betting.
and journey OF didnt have an "agenda" he was just a nice guy who was competitive and won most of his plays, he even won a posted baseball dog ML winner.
and if half a point was an issue you could just play at rio like OF would have did when he needed a half a point (and said as much ahead of time). that's being "sharp". .
i have nothing against shrink or his posts, but this is my opinion on the matter.
[This message was edited by RobFunk on May 28, 2004 at 09:21 PM.]
and journey OF didnt have an "agenda" he was just a nice guy who was competitive and won most of his plays, he even won a posted baseball dog ML winner.
and if half a point was an issue you could just play at rio like OF would have did when he needed a half a point (and said as much ahead of time). that's being "sharp". .
i have nothing against shrink or his posts, but this is my opinion on the matter.
[This message was edited by RobFunk on May 28, 2004 at 09:21 PM.]
I like Omnivourous, but why is he so offended over this? Unless maybe he flipflopped his play maybe? Who knows, but for him to cause this much commotion over someone else`s pick is ridiculous...
I don`t think Shrink would come in here saying he won if he didn`t JMO...I think he should have said he bought the point though..
It just seems odd the reaction from Frog, you`d think he lost by his reaction...Hopefully he will cool off and realize it was just one of those things that went overboard...
it was not by no means unrealistic to buy that point, anyone with half a clue can see it...
I don`t think Shrink would come in here saying he won if he didn`t JMO...I think he should have said he bought the point though..
It just seems odd the reaction from Frog, you`d think he lost by his reaction...Hopefully he will cool off and realize it was just one of those things that went overboard...
it was not by no means unrealistic to buy that point, anyone with half a clue can see it...
journey I agree . .and I also believe shrink when he says he bought the half point. . .but OF isnt cool with the idea that: hey, bet the lakers! it cashes easy! well. . no it doesnt and that is fine, but to come on afterwards like im sorry you guys followed me but at least I cashed becuase I shopped to 7 and hey did I mention I bought half a point?!
give me a break. .
and again I believe shrink. but really, who the hell buys off an even number? buying the half is called buying the hook you know like 3.5 to 3 in football 7.5 to 7 etc etc
poor omnivirous and his 600 posts gets called out to post EXACTLY what he is playing, and he says ok fine and then does and then still puts up winner after winner.
but then he sees a guy who has been here much much longer than him and seems to be the most repected, posting a play (la -7 or -7.5) that he touts as an easy winner only to come back later and say he did something else good for me and screw you. I think from OF's standpoint he has every right to feel the way he does.
give me a break. .
and again I believe shrink. but really, who the hell buys off an even number? buying the half is called buying the hook you know like 3.5 to 3 in football 7.5 to 7 etc etc
poor omnivirous and his 600 posts gets called out to post EXACTLY what he is playing, and he says ok fine and then does and then still puts up winner after winner.
but then he sees a guy who has been here much much longer than him and seems to be the most repected, posting a play (la -7 or -7.5) that he touts as an easy winner only to come back later and say he did something else good for me and screw you. I think from OF's standpoint he has every right to feel the way he does.
Shrink did post screen shot in another thread.
Wager Type: Spread (or run line)
Wager Status: Win
Risk / To Win Amount: 12,000.00 / 10,000.00 (USD)
Date Accepted: 27-May-2004
Time Accepted: 4:58:03 PM (Pacific)
Amount Paid: 10,000.00
Sport/Period: NBA Basketball / Game
Teams: Minnesota Timberwolves vs Los Angeles Lakers
Game Date: 27-May-2004
Wager Line: Los Angeles Lakers -6.5 -120
Wager Type: Spread (or run line)
Wager Status: Win
Risk / To Win Amount: 12,000.00 / 10,000.00 (USD)
Date Accepted: 27-May-2004
Time Accepted: 4:58:03 PM (Pacific)
Amount Paid: 10,000.00
Sport/Period: NBA Basketball / Game
Teams: Minnesota Timberwolves vs Los Angeles Lakers
Game Date: 27-May-2004
Wager Line: Los Angeles Lakers -6.5 -120
Here is what I played on that game:
Wager Type: Spread (or run line)
Wager Status: Win
Risk / To Win Amount: 100,000.00 / 100,000.00 (USD)
Date Accepted: 27-May-2004
Time Accepted: 4:58:03 PM (Pacific)
Amount Paid: 100,000.00
Sport/Period: NBA Basketball / Game
Teams: Minnesota Timberwolves vs Los Angeles Lakers
Game Date: 27-May-2004
Wager Line: Minnesota Timberwolves +7.5 +100
Wager Type: Spread (or run line)
Wager Status: Win
Risk / To Win Amount: 100,000.00 / 100,000.00 (USD)
Date Accepted: 27-May-2004
Time Accepted: 4:58:03 PM (Pacific)
Amount Paid: 100,000.00
Sport/Period: NBA Basketball / Game
Teams: Minnesota Timberwolves vs Los Angeles Lakers
Game Date: 27-May-2004
Wager Line: Minnesota Timberwolves +7.5 +100
