They really need to change this rule, at least for the playoffs.
First drive wins with a FG was awful, they marginally improved it to having a team score a first drive TD for the win. The common response is.."well, then stop them". Thats fine, but why does the loser of the coin flip have this responsibility yet the other team doesn't??
60 minutes and the game is even, you are supposed to start from scratch. But you don't. The winner of a random coin flip now has a better than 50% chance of winning. How is that fair??
If the first drive ends in a TD, then the other team has to have a chance to match it. If one team can't stop the other on the first drive, then the other defense has to have that same obligation. If they both score a TD, then its sudden death from there.
Kansas City had several chances to get off the field, I get that. But one team shouldn't have a > 50% chance of winning before you kick off.
First drive wins with a FG was awful, they marginally improved it to having a team score a first drive TD for the win. The common response is.."well, then stop them". Thats fine, but why does the loser of the coin flip have this responsibility yet the other team doesn't??
60 minutes and the game is even, you are supposed to start from scratch. But you don't. The winner of a random coin flip now has a better than 50% chance of winning. How is that fair??
If the first drive ends in a TD, then the other team has to have a chance to match it. If one team can't stop the other on the first drive, then the other defense has to have that same obligation. If they both score a TD, then its sudden death from there.
Kansas City had several chances to get off the field, I get that. But one team shouldn't have a > 50% chance of winning before you kick off.