Of course they deserve more pay then everyone else since they are the boss
But not the millions and millions more than everyone else.
Most of them are pretty clueless, ever seen the show undercover boss?
Problem isn't in the pay. It's the incentive. I'm sure there are much more intelligent posters than me that will take the time to explain.
The rise of activist investors is a very good trend for the most part. Much tougher for bad CEOs to continue to run a company with complacency or incompetency.
Not sure I agree with this. Changing the ceo incentive plan fundamentally changed big business in america. It's not about whats best for the business. It's what best for the shareholders.
i think activists can be good at times as long as they arent too short sighted
there are some complacent, long tenured Boards out there that need a kick in the ass by an activist
It's a little silly to bring someone in to be CEO, the company declines as well as the stock price, then 4 years later he's out and has banked $100 mil. Of course anyone living in the real world with bills is going to question that. Probably a lot more corruption than we'll ever know about why people get those jobs too.
A more silly idea is the fact that people spend 100K to go to a university and major in business. That PhD academics that have never managed a lemonade stand are somehow business experts that are going to help people get business savvy. I have a business degree and I really don't have the slightest idea about what it was that I was supposed to have learned when I was there. Maybe if I had majored in accounting I would have gotten a specialized trade, but a business degree is a complete joke. College in general is going to be priced out of relevance in the coming years, unless you are going to be a doctor or lawyer.