Now that is funny. Oklahoma went into this game ranked 7th or 8th in the AP, USA Today, and Harris Polls, and if not for a bullshit loss to Oregon, debatably may be ranked ahead of Florida and playing for the national championship.
Poll dynamics, right? I believe Oklahoma was ranked in the top 5 to start the season, I think Florida was behind them in the polls and Michigan well behind them. Assuming the Oregon debacle didn't happen, Oklahoma would have probably dropped behind Florida after losing to Texas, but likely would have leapfrogged back ahead of Florida after the loss to Auburn one week later. They would have leapfrogged Michigan in the same manner Florida did after Michigan's loss.
In other words, if Oklahoma wasn't a top 10 team, neither was Florida. I agree with the general concensus that Boise State would not go undefeated in a BCS conference. But they have as much size, speed, and depth as either Louisville or West Virginia.
Discounting their performance because they beat a "non top 10 Oklahoma" team is silly. Oklahoma is and was one of the best teams in the country. They got beat by a team that no other team in the country wants to play in that situation because it is a lose-lose scenario.