Hypothetical Question...

[buddyboy]

I think the books see it this way:

the short term benefits of carrying insurance (getting more players) do not outway the risks (see above) and since one day all sportsbooks will be regulated and be required to carry insurance there is no need for the books to prematurely (sp) offer it.

although I could be way off, but no matter, the books did not like the idea and only they know the real reason why.

and as the shrink passed along the following information: "It wouldn't covert enough newbies to pay off..."

 

[Jabow]

Hey Shrink, maybe you're looking at it at the wrong angle.

Maybe THE BOOKS themselves should be insured, audited to cover their client base.

With the "insurance" of a good company/group then maybe the clients will be more " at ease".

Just like most banks are FDIC.