How Trump is on track for a 2020 landslide

[bodyforlife]

See post 32, I just did prove it. Over 10 years the middle class tax's go up. Total bait and switch.

Let me know when you can look at facts without conjecture.

Class envy? LOL Sorry I didn't know you're shit doesn't stink. Carry on well to do troll.

Just another yawn.

So let's recap....

Your comment...."Put it in your own words, don't be lazy if you know all the facts."

And then you proceed to do just that with a major cut and paste job.

Your comment.... "You guys would be most of the replies I have got. Everyone has been an attack."

That's actually incorrect. You received a very civil and detailed response to your post. In return, you replied "I don't know you from spit. Also don't need a clown from H & R Block telling me who benefits from the tax cuts. Seems to me that you're the one that needs to resort to Ad Hominems.

When you can act like an adult, stop dodging and deflecting comments made to you, and reply directly to them with your own words, then get back to me. Your argument is same boring, class envy bullshit that has been pulled for years. As stated, if inflation is in check and people have more disposable income, then they are doing better. I don't give a rat's ass how the Zuckenbergers or Bezo's of the world are doing. Sorry you're so obsessed with it. One doesn't need to be a rocket scientist to understand that those that pay more would receive a bigger cut. Of course, the alternative would simply be to put Democrats in charge so that families can be taxed more. I just moved from a state that loved to fuck over the Middle Class in CA. No thanks.

 

[HamampEgger]

Just another yawn.

So let's recap....

Your comment...."Put it in your own words, don't be lazy if you know all the facts."

And then you proceed to do just that with a major cut and paste job.

Your comment.... "You guys would be most of the replies I have got. Everyone has been an attack."

That's actually incorrect. You received a very civil and detailed response to your post. In return, you replied "I don't know you from spit. Also don't need a clown from H & R Block telling me who benefits from the tax cuts. Seems to me that you're the one that needs to resort to Ad Hominems.

When you can act like an adult, stop dodging and deflecting comments made to you, and reply directly to them with your own words, then get back to me. Your argument is same boring, class envy bullshit that has been pulled for years. As stated, if inflation is in check and people have more disposable income, then they are doing better. I don't give a rat's ass how the Zuckenbergers or Bezo's of the world are doing. Sorry you're so obsessed with it. One doesn't need to be a rocket scientist to understand that those that pay more would receive a bigger cut. Of course, the alternative would simply be to put Democrats in charge so that families can be taxed more. I just moved from a state that loved to fuck over the Middle Class in CA. No thanks.

No actually I was called a ghost & liar. You said I couldn't do basic math. So that means you think I'm stupid. Not what I would call civil.

I put it in my own words in one of my replies. But that wasn't good enough math for some one. So I gave the long form. Funny you think a USA today story is good enough, but from a group that wants Tax Fairness quoting institutions that deal with the matter are not.

Its like I said, you hear what you want to hear. If not you deflect to garbage about being above the topic or class envy. Not once did you make a case to dispute what I posted.

So one can only assume you strawman & gaslight your way though a subject you have no reply for. You say much without saying nothing at all. You're post are long and boring. No Thanks.

 

[bodyforlife]

You're post are long and boring.

As are yours.

The first reply back to you was indeed very civil and detailed. You chose to ignore it and go into a personal attack. And since you chose that route, the logical response is that you don't understand math or basic logic.

Like I said, when you can directly reply to what's being said to you and stop your dodging and deflecting, you might be able to have a logical, civil conversation with someone. If not, no one is going to waste their time with you going off on tangents because you can't seem to refute what's being said to you.

 

[HamampEgger]

As are yours.

The first reply back to you was indeed very civil and detailed. You chose to ignore it and go into a personal attack. And since you chose that route, the logical response is that you don't understand math or basic logic.

Like I said, when you can directly reply to what's being said to you and stop your dodging and deflecting, you might be able to have a logical, civil conversation with someone. If not, no one is going to waste their time with you going off on tangents because you can't seem to refute what's being said to you.

Calling someone stupid and wanting a logical response is BS. You get what you give. I had one response that was civil. A guy named Josh, that I wrote a nice reply to.

All others were insulting and ​

[FONT=Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Calibri,Geneva,sans-serif]

sarcastic, which I replied much the same way. ​

[/FONT]

After all this you still have not made you're case or refuted what I posted. Just more gaslighting, I bet you know a lot about dodging & deflecting.


You know, no one is making you talk to me.

 

[HamampEgger]

As are yours.

The first reply back to you was indeed very civil and detailed. You chose to ignore it and go into a personal attack. And since you chose that route, the logical response is that you don't understand math or basic logic.

Like I said, when you can directly reply to what's being said to you and stop your dodging and deflecting, you might be able to have a logical, civil conversation with someone. If not, no one is going to waste their time with you going off on tangents because you can't seem to refute what's being said to you.

From Mr. H & R Block.

and the parrots like this guy regurgitated.

Gee? You don't say? How can that be? Because you're a bunch of clueless / classless liars?

You do know I prepare hundreds of tax returns every year, because I know a newbie doesn't join a gambling forum to discuss politics ​

This guy thinks I know him, called me a parrot, clueless, classless an a liar.

All said to him was. He's a clown that works at H&R Block. You tell me who's being more civil?

 

[HamampEgger]

Next guy.

You made that up.

But welcome back, casper. You're on what, your 8th user name here now?

The middle class doesn't pay income taxes in America.



(You don't know what a fact is)

You've been banned before and are back with a different user name.

Then our hero steps in to the picture.

Yawn. Why would anyone waste the time explaining basic math to you?

I would say my replies were rather tame considering all this name calling and vitriol.​

​

[SUB][/SUB]​

 

[mickj]

No, it really doesn't.

You made that up.

But welcome back, casper. You're on what, your 8th user name here now?

Ham & Egger. Yeah, 8th Ghost sounds about right. @)

 

[Willie99]

If somebody "new" signs up for a gambling forum and immediately proceeds to jump into the political threads, then

1) he's a flaming liberal
2) he's a ghost

It's weird to watch them in action, but reassuring to know that we're the lucky people in the gene pool

 

[bodyforlife]

Ham & Egger. Yeah, 8th Ghost sounds about right. @)

If somebody "new" signs up for a gambling forum and immediately proceeds to jump into the political threads, then

1) he's a flaming liberal
2) he's a ghost

It's weird to watch them in action, but reassuring to know that we're the lucky people in the gene pool

But according to him..."I am who you think I am. But not who you know." face)(*^%

Agree. It's definitely weird to watch them in action. But the tactics are nothing but a yawn now and it can be fun to call them out and watch them try and dance. A complete fail on his part. He couldn't come up with an original thought or make a cogent argument to save his life. His talking points are all over the internet and have been for years.

 

[HamampEgger]

Ham & Egger. Yeah, 8th Ghost sounds about right. @)

If somebody "new" signs up for a gambling forum and immediately proceeds to jump into the political threads, then

1) he's a flaming liberal
2) he's a ghost

It's weird to watch them in action, but reassuring to know that we're the lucky people in the gene pool

But according to him..."I am who you think I am. But not who you know." face)(*^%

Agree. It's definitely weird to watch them in action. But the tactics are nothing but a yawn now and it can be fun to call them out and watch them try and dance. A complete fail on his part. He couldn't come up with an original thought or make a cogent argument to save his life. His talking points are all over the internet and have been for years.

OH NO, the cool kids don't like me. Not here to be in you're club ladies. You can continue rubbing each others clits. LOL

 

[HamampEgger]

Oh sorry. You [FONT=Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Calibri,Geneva,sans-serif]probably don't know what a clit is.

Don't forget to play nice ladies.
[/FONT]

 

[bodyforlife]

What I find amusing about tax arguments like this are people trying to claim that the Middle Class being able to keep more of their money is actually a bad thing. As you said Willie, "it's weird to watch them in action". In addition, they never talk about the alternative...having a party in charge known for taking money from the Middle Class (for some reason, we should all be on board with that). The comments are laced with class envy arguments..."oh no, the rich are receiving more money!" (I'm still not sure why I should care so much about that). I'm quite content with what I've been able to achieve in my life with a Middle Class income (as are most of my friends). None of us are obsessed with how much money someone else is making, nor are we envious of them. Lastly, the majority of these people never give back any tax savings. Why is that? If they are so adamantly against tax cuts and it's a matter of principle, then common sense would dictate that they just don't accept it.

It really is strange how some people try to imply that this type of thinking is logical in any way.

 

[HamampEgger]

What I find amusing about tax arguments like this are people trying to claim that the Middle Class being able to keep more of their money is actually a bad thing. As you said Willie, "it's weird to watch them in action". In addition, they never talk about the alternative...having a party in charge known for taking money from the Middle Class (for some reason, we should all be on board with that). The comments are laced with class envy arguments..."oh no, the rich are receiving more money!" (I'm still not sure why I should care so much about that). I'm quite content with what I've been able to achieve in my life with a Middle Class income (as are most of my friends). None of us are obsessed with how much money someone else is making, nor are we envious of them. Lastly, the majority of these people never give back any tax savings. Why is that? If they are so adamantly against tax cuts and it's a matter of principle, then common sense would dictate that they just don't accept it.

It really is strange how some people try to imply that this type of thinking is logical in any way.

In the end (ten years from now) its the middle class who is paying for this. Not your so called envied class. Those are the facts.

So why should Middle Class people give money to rich people is the simple question. Not that you will answer, you won't even look at the facts.

I don't care for Democrats anymore than I care for Republicans. Two sides of the same coin. You are running out of options Mr. Strawman, just stick to the issues.

 

[bodyforlife]

In the end (ten years from now) its the middle class who is paying for this. Not your so called envied class. Those are the facts.

So why should Middle Class people give money to rich people is the simple question. Not that you will answer, you won't even look at the facts.

I don't care for Democrats anymore than I care for Republicans. Two sides of the same coin. You are running out of options Mr. Strawman, just stick to the issues.

Sure thing Nostradamus. I live in the here and now.

How much of your tax cut will you be foregoing to give back to the government since you are such a "principled person"? Not that you will answer.

Why should anyone want the alternative (a group known for taxing the Middle Class to the hilt)? Not that you will answer

What makes you think the government is so entitled to the money of the Middle Class or the rich? At what point did that become their money? Not that you will answer

Why are you trying to mislead people when the majority of the country will receive tax cuts? Not that you will answer

Why is it you can't understand that those that pay more taxes tend to receive the biggest cuts, since those that don't pay taxes can't receive a tax cut? Not that you will answer

Keep on dodging and deflecting Junior. Do you have an original thought or do you just quote talking points? Not that you will...oh wait...I don't need you to answer that one. I already know the answer. You don't have an original thought.

 

[HamampEgger]

Sure thing Nostradamus. I live in the here and now.

How much of your tax cut will you be foregoing to give back to the government since you are such a "principled person"? Not that you will answer.

Why should anyone want the alternative (a group known for taxing the Middle Class to the hilt)? Not that you will answer

What makes you think the government is so entitled to the money of the Middle Class or the rich? At what point did that become their money? Not that you will answer

Why are you trying to mislead people when the majority of the country will receive tax cuts? Not that you will answer

Why is it you can't understand that those that pay more taxes tend to receive the biggest cuts, since those that don't pay taxes can't receive a tax cut? Not that you will answer

Keep on dodging and deflecting Junior. Do you have an original thought or do you just quote talking points? Not that you will...oh wait...I don't need you to answer that one. I already know the answer. You don't have an original thought.

Answer my question first & I will answer one of yours.

So why should Middle Class people give money to rich people is the simple question?​

 

[bodyforlife]

Answer my question first & I will answer one of yours.

So why should Middle Class people give money to rich people is the simple question?​

Bullshit. You've been dodging since page 1. You answer them all first.

 

[HamampEgger]

Bullshit. You've been dodging since page 1. You answer them all first.

No Deal, read post 32 for all answers.

 

[bodyforlife]

No Deal, read post 32 for all answers.

No worries. I knew you couldn't. Dodge and deflect.

 

[busterhyman]

If somebody "new" signs up for a gambling forum and immediately proceeds to jump into the political threads, then

1) he's a flaming liberal
2) he's a ghost

It's weird to watch them in action, but reassuring to know that we're the lucky people in the gene pool

hope you're not talking about me

 

[Willie99]

hope you're not talking about me

c'mon man, you signed up in 2016 and you participate in the gambling arena, why would I be talking about you?

You can disagree with me in the political arena, I have no problem with that. And I've not see you post anything really stupid either, did I miss something