How many here would support a book who paid the DOS attackers?

Search

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
1,835
Tokens
I for one, barring Pinnacle because of my greed,(just kidding), would seriously think of pulling my money from any book that backed down to these terrorists. Anyone here have an opinion on this issue?
 

Old Fart
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,395
Tokens
Agree,
To me a book that pays these lowlives is NOT one I want to play with. But we will never know.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,310
Tokens
I think it's a business decision that each book would have to make. It wouldn't influence me one way or the other. There are a lot more important considerations, like is the book safe, the lines offered, things like that.

If they don't want to get attacked then they should drag their infrastructure into the 21st century.
 

New member
Joined
Feb 4, 2003
Messages
3,271
Tokens
I know everyone here says they don't want any books to pay up. At the same time, everyone is on here crying about not being able to get in to their books.

The real questions is:

Do you support books not paying the DOS attackers even if it means you may not be able to get your action in?
 

The Great Govenor of California
Joined
Feb 21, 2001
Messages
15,972
Tokens
I think some of the books that arent paying dont because they cant afford it or are too cheap.
 

Active member
Joined
Jun 20, 2000
Messages
71,780
Tokens
very tuff call here Week on what to do. very good topic
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
5,412
Tokens
I'd get concerned about their long-term solvency so I might keep a lower balance there. Standing up to the hackers is more expensive in the short run but pays dividends in the long run IMO. A defiant book is in it for the long haul and that's a positive sign for me.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
4,509
Tokens
That is a tuff one....

I would like to say that I wouldn't play at a book that paid the attackers, but then again what if the majority of their company is internet based without much of a call center base. They are then put in a real tough spot. They need a fast fix. Where as a company that has both can somewhat afford to wait to fix the problem.

I don't know my initial reaction is to say I would play with only the books that didn't pay as it would help solve the problem. But I could argue both.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
284
Tokens
Books that pay only encourage hackers to keep doing it, let's use the phone and make their hacking system hamrless
suomi.gif
 

Another Day, Another Dollar
Joined
Mar 1, 2002
Messages
42,730
Tokens
I do not think a boycott is a good solution as that only harms the book more and may cause more serious problems.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,773
Tokens
IF a mugger is trying to steal your wifes purse and has a gun to her head are you going to tell her to fight like hell based on principle? or you gonna tell her to give up the damn purse?

Screw me once shame on you.
Screw me again shame on me.

Pay the bastards, then fix it so it doesn't happen again. Then track them down and beat them like dogs.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
678
Tokens
A book which has a dozen of 10$ bettors cannot pay any amount,so they raise the brave-flag and hope to see hackers quitting.
Not that I support the hackers,but if you have a solid shop and some ambitions about it,you don't just sit on your ass waiting for the hackers to get bored!
 

Active member
Joined
Oct 20, 1999
Messages
75,444
Tokens
I would have to respect the books decision.

It would not prevent me from betting with them as long as I liked them and trusted them.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
15
Tokens
Unless a book has deep pockets and a very keen tech support staff (like CRIS), they will be virtually put out of internet business by the hackers. It's just that simple.

If an owner wants to play a macho game, good luck. Some places invested several hundred thousand in software, equipment, and pre-paid advertising. Unfortunately, paying another $20k ends up being a business decision.
 

Old Fart
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,395
Tokens
Where does it end.

First they came for all the male children less than 1 year of age. (Didn't bother me--I had none) Then they came for the old women over X years of age. Didn't bother me, none in my house. Then they came for me!
icon_frown.gif
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
131
Tokens
Did Pinnacle actually pay these terrorists?

I don't understand... I mean IF the books pay, what guarantee is there that they won't come back a week later, under a different name?

I think ALL books now know this is a real threat. Rather than pay the hackers, those companies that are here to serve us long term will invest in further protecting their businesses from such attacks.

If a book cannot afford to secure their online business, they will not be seeing my money!
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
279
Tokens
Pinnacle did pay but can you blame them?99% of their handle is done on the net it would be stupid for them not to pay.Pull your money out Weekendalki I'm sure they won't miss your peanuts.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
131
Tokens
Yeah, can't really blame Pinny for that given the circumstances... but my point is that books don't really have an excuse for being unprepared anymore. Thoughts?
 

Ha-Sheesh
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
2,494
Tokens
i think...
since superbowl is coming on the 1st,
attacks could be expected by. 27-28-29-
in a desperate solution, hackers
can cash-out on saturday...31,
in this case, what we can do,,,
is to prepare the ICE GIGA ROUTERS,
to expect DOS Attacks, or, if they don't want to help us, just advice the next Hop, (ICE PROVIDER)..
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,869
Messages
13,574,388
Members
100,879
Latest member
am_sports
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com