Fred's BOWL SEASON Thread

Search

Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2011
Messages
6,021
Tokens
With the promotion of Offensive Coordinator Major Applewhite to new head coach of the Houston Cougars - any thoughts on how the team will react as they gear-up for their bowl game? Lot's of high profile names were tossed out there but they decided to stay "in-house" for their new HC. Wondering if this is a popular decision amongst the players?
I mentioned it in post #14. I would think the players would like the continuity of choosing someone in-house. Applewhite relates to his players and has the DC still with him for the bowl game. Yet I haven't read much about player reaction.
 

Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2011
Messages
6,021
Tokens
3* Tulsa -11.5 Good chance I add on to this play or make a 1H bet. This matchup fits plenty of factors for a Tulsa blowout. Tulsa is the far superior running team, which makes a big difference in bowl games. In fact, this Tulsa run attack has looked fantastic for the last 2/3 of the season. Only Ohio State and Houston, two top 5 run defenses, have been able to keep the Tulsa run game in check. UCF, another good run defense, however gave up over 300 yards to Tulsa on the ground. Tulsa also has a decent passing game, a senior QB who has started for 3 years, and an improving defense. HC Montgomery is very good offensive coach who was considered for some other coaching vacancies, but has decided to stay along with his entire coaching staff. His players have to like this kind of loyalty and likely will play a high effort game in their coming bowl.

CMU is a team going in a different direction. They lost 4 out of their last 5, and their only win was against Ohio- which lost it due to turnovers. Losses: EMU, Miami OH by 20, Kent and Toledo. CMU also got hammered by WMU, a team similar to Tulsa in that they have a great running game, and a very capable QB. When coach Dan Enos left for Arkansas to be the OC, he left behind a coaching staff that has underachieved. Their new coach, now in his 2nd year, has been going through chemotherapy during the season, and his players seem to be "off" due to it. CMU is a poor running team that depends highly on the passing of QB Cooper Rush. Rush was once considered a pretty high draft prospect, but his star has fallen. Maybe his OL has been the problem, with 33 sacks given up, and being unable to run block well, but Rush was a better QB last season. CMU just fits the profile of a bad bowl team- Weak defense, poor running, and a mediocre coaching staff.

Tulsa is 8th in rushing, 10th in total yards…and that's with the Ohio State and Houston game thrown in there. I'd be on this for more, but the point spread allows for a dreaded back door cover. Will be back when the 1H line is out.
 

Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2011
Messages
6,021
Tokens
3* Tulsa -11.5 Good chance I add on to this play or make a 1H bet. This matchup fits plenty of factors for a Tulsa blowout. Tulsa is the far superior running team, which makes a big difference in bowl games. In fact, this Tulsa run attack has looked fantastic for the last 2/3 of the season. Only Ohio State and Houston, two top 5 run defenses, have been able to keep the Tulsa run game in check. UCF, another good run defense, however gave up over 300 yards to Tulsa on the ground. Tulsa also has a decent passing game, a senior QB who has started for 3 years, and an improving defense. HC Montgomery is very good offensive coach who was considered for some other coaching vacancies, but has decided to stay along with his entire coaching staff. His players have to like this kind of loyalty and likely will play a high effort game in their coming bowl.

CMU is a team going in a different direction. They lost 4 out of their last 5, and their only win was against Ohio- which lost it due to turnovers. Losses: EMU, Miami OH by 20, Kent and Toledo. CMU also got hammered by WMU, a team similar to Tulsa in that they have a great running game, and a very capable QB. When coach Dan Enos left for Arkansas to be the OC, he left behind a coaching staff that has underachieved. Their new coach, now in his 2nd year, has been going through chemotherapy during the season, and his players seem to be "off" due to it. CMU is a poor running team that depends highly on the passing of QB Cooper Rush. Rush was once considered a pretty high draft prospect, but his star has fallen. Maybe his OL has been the problem, with 33 sacks given up, and being unable to run block well, but Rush was a better QB last season. CMU just fits the profile of a bad bowl team- Weak defense, poor running, and a mediocre coaching staff.

Tulsa is 8th in rushing, 10th in total yards…and that's with the Ohio State and Houston game thrown in there. I'd be on this for more, but the point spread allows for a dreaded back door cover. Will be back when the 1H line is out.
Forgot to add this: I'm not sure what the recent ATS record is for mid-range MAC teams, in bowls, but if memory serves me, it's bad. CMU's 2nd game of the season upset of Okie State seems to be their only statement game, and if they hadn't had that lucky play/ blown call there at the end, CMU would have had almost a complete washed-out season.
 

Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2011
Messages
6,021
Tokens
3* UCF/ Arkansas State- under 49 This early bowl game features two run-heavy offenses, neither with a quarterback that can light up the scoreboard. And both of their running attacks aren't very effective vs. better competition. Let's take Warren Wand, the feature back for ASU. He has 3 exemplary games vs. the Ds of NMSU, Texas State and Ga. Southern- 3 really ugly run Ds. But in other games, he's mediocre at a 3-4 ypc clip. UCF played against some very good offensive teams(USF, Tulsa, Michigan, ECU), but still played relatively well defensively, and I'm not sure how ASU will score much. UCF was 19th in defensive efficiency, 9th in defensive passing %, and had 36 sacks. Arkansas State was 42 in defensive efficiency(and that's with a poor start to the season), 21st in passing D %, and had 37 sacks. ASU has the best defensive talent in the Sun Belt, but playing Toledo, Auburn and Utah State early make their D stats look worse than this unit really plays. With two first year QBs, I think we'll see a more conservative game plan, and a game that starts with some dropped passes, miscues, and offensive penalties. Timing likely off. Defenses are rested after the weekly grind of the season. If the 1st half total is around 24, I'll be on that too. Let's pray for rain.
2* UCF/ Arkansas St.- under 24.5 1H ​Got the number I was hoping for + 1/2
 

Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2011
Messages
6,021
Tokens
2* Appalachian St. +1/2 1H After the long layoff, I'll take the team that runs more consistently, and depends less on the pass. Also, Toledo has not been very good stopping the run, and will likely take a while to adjust to the App. St. multiple sets and options. App. State has a very good OL, and this offense tends to slowly work their way down the field, sometimes monopolizing the time of possession. App. State also a capable passer in senior Taylor Lamb, who is also an option in the run. The Mountaineers actually have 2 go-to RBs that combined for over 2200 yards and can break off a long gainer. Toledo has a dynamic offense, for sure, but I'm betting they struggle a little early on with their timing oriented passing offense. Toledo is not at all excited about playing a Sun Belt team in Montgomery, Alabama. Appalachian State is also not altogether thrilled about going there, but this is only their 2nd bowl game in history, many seniors, and they at least appreciate getting a decent opponent. Last year, Appalachian State clearly outplayed their opponent, Ohio, in their bowl game, but 3 turnovers led to 17 points(a fumble TD and a pick 6), and they won but didn't cover.
 

Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2016
Messages
13,680
Tokens
Fred-hope you Da Man as I'm following although my POS site doesn't have UCF full game total yet but does 1H! WTF?
 

Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2011
Messages
6,021
Tokens
Fred-hope you Da Man as I'm following although my POS site doesn't have UCF full game total yet but does 1H! WTF?
Hope you got the Army play. Good luck, but tail at your own risk. I'm just giving my plays and my reasoning behind them.
 

Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2011
Messages
6,021
Tokens
These FCS games have limits in the offshore books, but I really like:

1* EWU -8.5
1* EWU/ Youngstown St. -under 55 (both -120) News out today says that 4-5 Youngstown St. players are likely suspended for this game, including 3 large contributors. Last week, their starting RB only got one carry because of a "coach's decision". Youngstown beat Wofford last week, a playoff team that never passes the ball, and their one dimensional offense was a liability. Also, YS travels across the country to beautiful Cheney, WA and is playing this game in zero degrees temperatures. Youngstown has struggled offensively vs. better competition, and after EWU's 38-0 dismantling of Richmond last week, I'd say that they are facing pretty good competition here. EWU's QB Gabe Gubrud has been out of sight great in big games this year.

Have more on the under than the straight bet.
 

Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2011
Messages
6,021
Tokens
2* Memphis +5 This play is under the category of bowl games being a sort of one game season, and that in the flow of the regular season, WKU might be the play/ or no play. WKU lost their excellent and popular HC, Jeff Brohm, to Purdue. Now the WKU players and coaches are all making nice about how they are moving on, but I think Brohm's loss is a major downer for this team. They have already had 3 decommits, and I think the players already there liked playing for Brohm so much, that they might be off their game/ prep a bit. There's also the likelihood of some of the coaches joining Brohm at Purdue. Asst. coaches and interns desperately trying to keep their recruiting class together. Then there's the half empty stadium for their Conference USA championship game with La. Tech. If I was there, I would have gone- dang, what a great matchup.

Memphis played a very easy first 3 games, but then their conference schedule was much tougher than WKU's. Memphis also defeated Temple and Houston, so they have it in them to play their A game for this one game season. Memphis also has one of the best special teams unit in the nation. WKU has some excellent skill players on offense, and they will be the focus of Memphis coaching staff, which is totally intact. Memphis can win this game, and the points may not come into play- but I'll gladly take them anyways.

The over is a popular play here, but I'd be cautious- bowl games rarely go over 80. The defenses are finally well-rested, and the offensive timing can be off after the layoff.
 

Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
1,124
Tokens
Awesome stuff Fred:toast:
ill be joining you for the ride this Bowl Season.
:money8:
 

Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2011
Messages
6,021
Tokens
3* Tulsa -11.5 Good chance I add on to this play or make a 1H bet. This matchup fits plenty of factors for a Tulsa blowout. Tulsa is the far superior running team, which makes a big difference in bowl games. In fact, this Tulsa run attack has looked fantastic for the last 2/3 of the season. Only Ohio State and Houston, two top 5 run defenses, have been able to keep the Tulsa run game in check. UCF, another good run defense, however gave up over 300 yards to Tulsa on the ground. Tulsa also has a decent passing game, a senior QB who has started for 3 years, and an improving defense. HC Montgomery is very good offensive coach who was considered for some other coaching vacancies, but has decided to stay along with his entire coaching staff. His players have to like this kind of loyalty and likely will play a high effort game in their coming bowl.

CMU is a team going in a different direction. They lost 4 out of their last 5, and their only win was against Ohio- which lost it due to turnovers. Losses: EMU, Miami OH by 20, Kent and Toledo. CMU also got hammered by WMU, a team similar to Tulsa in that they have a great running game, and a very capable QB. When coach Dan Enos left for Arkansas to be the OC, he left behind a coaching staff that has underachieved. Their new coach, now in his 2nd year, has been going through chemotherapy during the season, and his players seem to be "off" due to it. CMU is a poor running team that depends highly on the passing of QB Cooper Rush. Rush was once considered a pretty high draft prospect, but his star has fallen. Maybe his OL has been the problem, with 33 sacks given up, and being unable to run block well, but Rush was a better QB last season. CMU just fits the profile of a bad bowl team- Weak defense, poor running, and a mediocre coaching staff.

Tulsa is 8th in rushing, 10th in total yards…and that's with the Ohio State and Houston game thrown in there. I'd be on this for more, but the point spread allows for a dreaded back door cover. Will be back when the 1H line is out.
2* Tulsa -7 1H This line has already moved from 11.5 to 12.5 for the game bet. Could move close to 14, or underdog bettors could hit it the day before game time. A little insurance against a back door cover.
 

Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2010
Messages
781
Tokens
The next 2 plays reflect my general disdain for the Mt. West Conference, at least how badly they play defense.

2* UTSA +7.5 (-120)
I'm not so sure that New Mexico is that excited to be playing AGAIN in Albuquerque. Yes, it's a home game, but if you're a Lobo player wouldn't you rather travel somewhere…say California, Las Vegas, Florida, Hawaii….anywhere but staying at home for the 2nd year in a row. I think UTSA will be the more motivated team here, and they're led by HC Frank Wilson- the former assistant HC at LSU and ace recruiter. His players have never played in a bowl game, are coming off a 2015 poor season, and Albuquerque is just fine with them. Wilson motivated his team to play well vs. better teams, such as their blowout of MTSU, and close losses to ASU and Texas A&M.

The general thinking here is that running teams do well in bowl games, and that's true. But NM is pretty one-dimensional, and passing is only used as a last resort. New Mexico is also the poorer defensive team here- being 119th in defensive efficiency(which takes into account strength of schedule) and 123rd passing yds/ attempt. So yes, UTSA will struggle with the Lobos' option offense, but I think NMU struggles even more with a UTSA offense that can run the ball well, and pass well enough to convert 3rd downs and break off a big play. In fact, I could make the case that the Lobos are the worst defensive team in the bowl schedule. I also question HC Bob Davie a bit. He tried to go with his passing QB earlier in the year, Austin Apodaca, rather than senior Lamar Jordan- who is the more dynamic runner and probably the more dynamic leader. It was a bad idea and losing to NMSU and to Rutgers kind of affirmed it. Davie is still putting Apodaca in at times, although to be honest he's not a great passer at 55%.

As for schedules, NMU played Boise, not SD St, and their best game was 5 point win at home over Air Force. UTSA played a few bombs, but also played very well vs. good competition. In the one game season that is the bowl season, I think they'll play their A game, and possibly even pull out the upset. Going against the disappointed home team here and their crappy MWC defense.

I like the angle - kinda prefer the over
 

Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2008
Messages
3,518
Tokens
One of the best cappers around,,,dude flat out wins,,,personallyi just play 3 unit and up...you would be killing it even more if one followed fred.
 

Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2011
Messages
6,021
Tokens
6* ODU -4 Both of the head coaches deserve recognition and praise for turning these two teams around. EMU's HC Creighton took a thankless job coming to EMU, a team that recruits terribly and usually only wins 1-3 games per year. He got his team to 7-5, which even in the MAC is an accomplishment. But that being said, too much of the success of this bowl game is laid on the shoulders of QB Brogan Roback. EMU has a paltry running game, and their receivers are steady, but not explosive by any means. EMU also has a fairly poor defense, average by MAC standards, but against teams like ODU, they struggle. Creighton and this program has dealt with a lot, and going to the Bahamas is well-deserved, but I can't seeing them staying with ODU here. EMU has possibly the worst attendance in the MAC, a dissatisfied faculty and student base because of the subsidies needed to keep the football program afloat. Recruiting to Ypsilanti is very difficult. QB Roback was suspended early this season for breaking rules, and his maturity was questioned. There's no doubt he is talented, but I much prefer the ODU senior QB David Washington in big games like this. Washington is a dual threat that is smart and a good decision-maker.

ODU has a huge advantage in the running game- with a speedy, elusive RB in Ray Lawry, and a bruiser in Jeremy Cox. They average, combined, over 6 yards per carry. Washington also has better receivers than EMU, although Roback is the better pure passer. ODU also a very tough defensive front 7, a defense that really came on in the last 2/3 of the season. But one of the main reasons I really like this play is HC Bobby Wilder. He built this team from scratch, is a great motivator(which helps in a 1 game season), and just agreed to a contract extension. Wilder is a long-time offensive innovator who also worked wonders with this ODU offense this year. His players will play very hard for him. They know he could have taken a job elsewhere, but chose to stay. Both teams are experiencing their first bowl game. The Bahamas is not a bad place for that, and I am only slightly concerned about focus in such an exotic place for these young men. Could be true for either team.
 

New member
Joined
Aug 23, 2016
Messages
1,831
Tokens
thanks Fred! just laid on a guys big teaser bet because of your input!
 

Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2014
Messages
225
Tokens
Bol Fred wish you the best of success this bowl season as I will be tailing along! Thanks for the info and hard work!
 

Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2011
Messages
6,021
Tokens
Big day tomorrow. GL to all those who posted above.

Tonight's game was a good example of the oddsmakers getting it right at the open. ND State line moved a bunch due to all the cash coming in on them sharp and square; although being an FCS game the take probably was small.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,109,892
Messages
13,463,926
Members
99,498
Latest member
casatundraokw
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com