im select and need a bankroll for football. im not some degenerate scumbag but these events at bet mill have KILLED me.like i said ive been a member with bet mill since 98 and in feb reloaded my acct with a total of $1,276. since then it expanded to the current sum and every 2 weeks i was getting out 500.marc said:
Doug said:
The continental was debunked and holders of it received 2% of its perceived value.
Not sure if a betmill balance is worth much more than 2%, but Id take a shot for that small amount of risk and potential 50 fold payoff.
No way would I today buy this balance for 65% of account balance.
Great idea with this thread. If its feasible its a way for some guys to avoid potentially being totally wiped out.
so how does this work now, u said u have $3,100 USD in ur MIllenium betting account, n the amt is already wagered and rolled in full and can be withdrawn in full, what i dont get is y r u giving $1,100 away and only taking $ 2,000 , and if thats the case what would gaurantee do i have that the money will be wired to me. i just got some money i saved up this summer i would definatley give u $2,000 if i was going to get $3,100 for it back in return. let me know how does this work.
isaacm said:
See what I mean?? This is exactly what I've spoke about when I have talked about players that aren't exactly experienced. No offense Isaacm, there is nothing wrong with not having a lot of experience in whatever industry one is in....it will come.
Isaacm, the situation is, that there is a GOOD chance that Bet On Sports will NEVER reopen, and if that happens, more than likely, there is a good chance that people with player accounts there will get NOTHING, OR, they may get something like 5 cents on the dollar, and it may take years.
Guys that are soliciting their BoS accounts, I certainly hope you don't take advantage of someone that really isn't aware of what is going on, you wouldn't be any better than BoS themselves.
I would pay 26 cents on the dollar for up to 10,000 in account balance.
It must be a respected poster here. I don't want to get anyone's hopes too high as I would be very selective with whom I did business.
Let me know in this thread. In essence if you have 10k, I will give you 2600 for it. I will entertain all accounts to a lower limit of 2k.
Good luck and my offer will be off the table by 8 p.m. EDT tomorrow night (Saturday, July 29th) as to avoid the seller feeling they can wait around for better offers. 24 hours or no deal.
tulsa
It must be a respected poster here. I don't want to get anyone's hopes too high as I would be very selective with whom I did business.
Let me know in this thread. In essence if you have 10k, I will give you 2600 for it. I will entertain all accounts to a lower limit of 2k.
Good luck and my offer will be off the table by 8 p.m. EDT tomorrow night (Saturday, July 29th) as to avoid the seller feeling they can wait around for better offers. 24 hours or no deal.
tulsa
Thank You
Thank you to all who have replied. To answer a few questions, the initial deposit was $2,000, well over a year ago. The balance was rolled many times. No withdrawals have been made.
I specified someone in Costa Rica for a few reasons. One, I want it to be a straight cash transaction on both sides. You'd give me cash, and when I got paid I'd give you cash. If, when they pay, it is by check then it would be a soon as the check cleared. If it is by neteller then you'd get paid as soon as I have control of the money.
Also, if you are in CR and known in the industry, then I could offer a substantial reference who would vouch for me.
If you are not in CR it seems unlikely to me that you'd be willing to accept the risk. But irrespective of anything else, if I say I'm going to pay then I am going to pay.
As for offers of less than $2,000. I don't know what the "right" price is. And obviously it is the uncertainty that makes me want to construct a deal. I may entertain lower offers, but if they are substantially lower then I would almost certainly prefer to stick it out.
Clearly this is a volatile situation, and circumstances may change at any time, but as of this writing my offer still stands.
Again, I appreciate all the replies.
Thank you to all who have replied. To answer a few questions, the initial deposit was $2,000, well over a year ago. The balance was rolled many times. No withdrawals have been made.
I specified someone in Costa Rica for a few reasons. One, I want it to be a straight cash transaction on both sides. You'd give me cash, and when I got paid I'd give you cash. If, when they pay, it is by check then it would be a soon as the check cleared. If it is by neteller then you'd get paid as soon as I have control of the money.
Also, if you are in CR and known in the industry, then I could offer a substantial reference who would vouch for me.
If you are not in CR it seems unlikely to me that you'd be willing to accept the risk. But irrespective of anything else, if I say I'm going to pay then I am going to pay.
As for offers of less than $2,000. I don't know what the "right" price is. And obviously it is the uncertainty that makes me want to construct a deal. I may entertain lower offers, but if they are substantially lower then I would almost certainly prefer to stick it out.
Clearly this is a volatile situation, and circumstances may change at any time, but as of this writing my offer still stands.
Again, I appreciate all the replies.
nhoj said:
I'm not exactly sure what you mean, but if you're saying that the person buying my risk wouldn't be eligible for the Rx guarantee, well, perhaps you have a point. However, I would still be the one cashing out the account. I would then pay off the buyer. They are two separate transactions.
That said, I don't see how the Rx could possibly reimburse everybody, and I'm not putting a whole lot of value on that.
gbogo said:
They can't play it both ways. If they are returning only the deposit amount, and not any winnings, then they can't turn around and deduct losses.
The only way to justify returning only the deposit amount is to state that the wagers were not legal, and therefore not honored. If they count the losers, then they're back in the same position, and in fact reasserting, that these illegal wagers stand.
Given a choice, they would be better off financially returning the current balance, as of course most accounts have lost money.
