I don't think they've realized yet that there is little to no money to made playing this b2b road angle. Especially when the team is a dog of 6+. As I tried to point out above before the LAR-DAL game. It's actually the opposite. Look at SF last weekend. Third straight road game. WAS off bye. Which team was "tired" and should have failed?? Can't use that logic. If anything, the books use it to their advantage.
[h=2]This is from 2 years ago from Sports Inights --[/h]
| CRITERIA | ATS RECORD | UNITS WON | ROI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Road Team Following Loss | 689-605 (53.2%) | +50.01 | +3.9% |
| Road Team Following Road Loss | 277-187 (59.7%) | +78.41 | +16.9% |
| Road Underdog Following Road Loss | 201-133 (60.2%) | +59.14 | +17.7% |
| Road Underdog Following Road Loss, OU <45 | 157-94 (62.5%) | +56.73 | +22.6% |
I think the LA Rams qualify for this spot. They played in Jacksonville last week and have a "home" game in London this week. That's about 5,000 miles from LA. Cardinals were at home last week in Arizona. If there was ever a team that could be "weary" from being on the road it's the Rams. They spent the entire week in Jacksonville and just arrived in London this AM. They are 3.5-4 point favorites this Sunday.
current season result
su 5-5,,ats 5-5
as predicted by others in the thread earlier,,,should end up around 50% with this and is exactly 50% now
if accounting for the factors of short weeks for the home team and 10 days off for the visiting team going into the 2nd of back to back then 2 losses could have been avoided
week 9
---------
atl at Carolina +2.5
fade atl,,,take Carolina +2.5
su 5-5,,ats 5-5
as predicted by others in the thread earlier,,,should end up around 50% with this and is exactly 50% now
if accounting for the factors of short weeks for the home team and 10 days off for the visiting team going into the 2nd of back to back then 2 losses could have been avoided
week 9
---------
atl at Carolina +2.5
fade atl,,,take Carolina +2.5
