THe Dem Candidates didn't whine and cry about the Mean Media, so no need. But here's the Fact Checks for it for anyone interested. http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...hecking-first-democratic-presidential-debate/
another libtard trait
1) low income
2) live in very crowded more dangerous neighborhoods
3) liars, often times creating lives and experiences they don't live
4) victims of the big bad world
5) Paul's
6) need and want and desire government solutions, it's like politicians are their parents
7) know nothing more than what some politician can teach them in 10 or less seconds
8) fucking dolts
9) call political opposition racist or selfish because they can't formulate a reasoned argument
10) write their own versions of history
11) genetically inferior (that says it all)
stop wasting your fucking time, lest you want to be a fucking dolt too
Cant wait to see the next moderators ask the Democrat candidates the same questions the next debate!
Ask Clinton about her past business dealings... and when you dont get the answers you want, keep digging and prodding and question every answer she gives!
Ask Sanders about his tax plan, and how it would work, then prod on and on about the numbers.
Would be a fun start.
this way there is no bias, ask both groups the same questions. Whats good for one is good for another
[ Maggot liar sewer rat guesser says fact-checker sites don't have biases. He is clearly severely retarded. ]
[h=1]WASHINGTON POST FACT-CHECKER’S PARTISAN FRAUD EXPOSED IN HILLARY’S ‘MARINE’ TALE[/h]
by JOHN NOLTE13 Nov 201596
By awarding Democrat Hillary Clinton only two Pinocchios for her wildly improbable tale of trying to join the Marines forty years ago, The Washington Post fact-check column has now been fully exposed as the partisan fraud it is, and has always been.
During the 2012 presidential election, Republican nominee Mitt Romney ran ads critical of Barack Obama for not visiting Israel during his first presidential term. The ads were true, and objectively so, because Obama did not visit Israel during his first presidential term.
For claiming that a president who didn’t visit Israel didn’t visit Israel, Washington Post fact-checker Glenn Kessler awarded Romney two Pinocchios.
No. Really.
Yes, you read that correctly: Kessler awarded Romney the same number of Pinocchios for telling the truth as he did for Hillary’s ridiculous tale about attempting to join the Marines.
Wait, it gets worse.
Much worse.
After confirming that Republican presidential candidate Carly Fiorina did indeed begin her incredible career-rise as a secretary, the Washington Post fact-checker awarded Fiorina 3 Pinocchios for claiming that she began her incredible career-rise as a secretary. Moreover, the fact-check headline declared Fiorina’s objectively true claim as “bogus.”
No. Really.
Glenn Kessler continues to expose himself as nothing more than a partisan fraud; as nothing more than a protection racket always on stand-by to explain why Obama didn’t mean what he said; always on stand-by to protect Hillary from her documented lies.
Kessler targets Republicans almost twice as often as Democrats, and says he doesn’t.
[h=1]WASHINGTON POST FACT-CHECKER’S PARTISAN FRAUD EXPOSED IN HILLARY’S ‘MARINE’ TALE[/h]
74
1
149
by JOHN NOLTE13 Nov 201596
By awarding Democrat Hillary Clinton only two Pinocchios for her wildly improbable tale of trying to join the Marines forty years ago, The Washington Post fact-check column has now been fully exposed as the partisan fraud it is, and has always been.
During the 2012 presidential election, Republican nominee Mitt Romney ran ads critical of Barack Obama for not visiting Israel during his first presidential term. The ads were true, and objectively so, because Obama did not visit Israel during his first presidential term.
For claiming that a president who didn’t visit Israel didn’t visit Israel, Washington Post fact-checker Glenn Kessler awarded Romney two Pinocchios.
No. Really.
Yes, you read that correctly: Kessler awarded Romney the same number of Pinocchios for telling the truth as he did for Hillary’s ridiculous tale about attempting to join the Marines.
Wait, it gets worse.
Much worse.
After confirming that Republican presidential candidate Carly Fiorina did indeed begin her incredible career-rise as a secretary, the Washington Post fact-checker awarded Fiorina 3 Pinocchios for claiming that she began her incredible career-rise as a secretary. Moreover, the fact-check headline declared Fiorina’s objectively true claim as “bogus.”
No. Really.
Glenn Kessler continues to expose himself as nothing more than a partisan fraud; as nothing more than a protection racket always on stand-by to explain why Obama didn’t mean what he said; always on stand-by to protect Hillary from her documented lies.
Kessler targets Republicans almost twice as often as Democrats, and says he doesn’t.
[ Maggot liar sewer rat guesser says fact-checker sites don't have biases. He is clearly severely retarded. ]
[h=1]WASHINGTON POST FACT-CHECKER’S PARTISAN FRAUD EXPOSED IN HILLARY’S ‘MARINE’ TALE[/h]74
1
149
by JOHN NOLTE13 Nov 201596
By awarding Democrat Hillary Clinton only two Pinocchios for her wildly improbable tale of trying to join the Marines forty years ago, The Washington Post fact-check column has now been fully exposed as the partisan fraud it is, and has always been.
During the 2012 presidential election, Republican nominee Mitt Romney ran ads critical of Barack Obama for not visiting Israel during his first presidential term. The ads were true, and objectively so, because Obama did not visit Israel during his first presidential term.
For claiming that a president who didn’t visit Israel didn’t visit Israel, Washington Post fact-checker Glenn Kessler awarded Romney two Pinocchios.
No. Really.
Yes, you read that correctly: Kessler awarded Romney the same number of Pinocchios for telling the truth as he did for Hillary’s ridiculous tale about attempting to join the Marines.
Wait, it gets worse.
Much worse.
After confirming that Republican presidential candidate Carly Fiorina did indeed begin her incredible career-rise as a secretary, the Washington Post fact-checker awarded Fiorina 3 Pinocchios for claiming that she began her incredible career-rise as a secretary. Moreover, the fact-check headline declared Fiorina’s objectively true claim as “bogus.”
No. Really.
Glenn Kessler continues to expose himself as nothing more than a partisan fraud; as nothing more than a protection racket always on stand-by to explain why Obama didn’t mean what he said; always on stand-by to protect Hillary from her documented lies.
Kessler targets Republicans almost twice as often as Democrats, and says he doesn’t.
What are the most "Pinnochio's" he has given to Obama or Hillary for one statement? And how many times have the received that?
How about the same for the top Republicans? whats the most they have gotten? And how many times?
Ive never been to that site, so maybe ya can let me know
Obama gets 4 Pinocchios when he deserves it, Hillary gets 4 when she deserves it, the R's get 4 when they deserve it. Your later point is the usual attempt at false equivalency. If the R's lie more than Obama, they get more Pinocchio at these objective Fact checkeing sites. Any attempt to equalize things based on party lines would remove objectivity.
