You keep telling yourself that - that's why you're a lib: idealistic yet hopelessly naive.
Someone dazzles you with impressive words like "reason" and "evidence-based" and "science" and suddenly a militant secularist like you becomes religious.
That's how we ended up with Obamacare - "evidence and fact-based" health reform engineered by super smart people (garbage in-garbage out)
the wise man chips in
[ More evidence that shows how utterly stupid and ignorant the vile sewer rat Guesser is ]
[h=1]Washington Post ‘Fact-Checker’ Leaves out Two Very Important Facts About Benghazi[/h]
Michael Cantrell
October 30, 2015 4:24 pm
Any time you have a liberal publication, like, oh The Washington Post, for example, calling one of their columns a “fact-checker,” you can rest assured you’re going to hear — or in this case, read — the exact opposite of the truth, particularly when it comes to liberal favorites like Hillary Clinton.
Apparently Glenn Kessler who puts together these little columns — you know, the ones with the “Pinocchios” — decided to “fact-check” Hillary on Benghazi, but rather than calling her out for her mountain of crap involving the incident, they decided to dump on Sen. Marco Rubio, calling him the liar.
So much for bipartisanship in the media, right? Gee, didn’t the MSM just get ripped to shreds by a certain GOP presidential candidate a few days ago for this sort of behavior?
Apparently this “editor” wanted to shoot holes through the truth about Clinton denying Benghazi was a terrorist attack in public, while clearly calling the tragedy just that in private.
Rep. Trey Gowdy and his Select Committee have unearthed three documents — not one, not two, but three —clearly proving she did this, but since Hillary is the Democratic darling for president, the media is doing everything in its power to make this fact go the way of the dinosaur.
Kessler decided to award Rubio some Pinnocchios — accuse him of lying— by attempting to create a timeline that supports his own ridiculous theory of Hillary being a victim of “the fog of war.”
The only problem is that he leaves out two major details.
Here’s the timeline via Breitbart:
In words, these key details missing from the timeline prove without a shadow of a doubt Clinton lied about the Benghazi terrorist attack being the result of an Internet video — an absolutely absurd claim to begin with — having been informed from the get-go it was a terrorist attack and telling others, privately, the same information.
This is a perfect example of how the left-wing media will do anything and everything to please their progressive overlords in the government and help sleazy, big government liberals keep the power in D.C.
It’s well beyond time to take the mainstream media to task for this kind of nonsense and restore integrity back to journalism.
[h=1]Washington Post ‘Fact-Checker’ Leaves out Two Very Important Facts About Benghazi[/h]
October 30, 2015 4:24 pm
Click
Like
Like
Any time you have a liberal publication, like, oh The Washington Post, for example, calling one of their columns a “fact-checker,” you can rest assured you’re going to hear — or in this case, read — the exact opposite of the truth, particularly when it comes to liberal favorites like Hillary Clinton.
Apparently Glenn Kessler who puts together these little columns — you know, the ones with the “Pinocchios” — decided to “fact-check” Hillary on Benghazi, but rather than calling her out for her mountain of crap involving the incident, they decided to dump on Sen. Marco Rubio, calling him the liar.
So much for bipartisanship in the media, right? Gee, didn’t the MSM just get ripped to shreds by a certain GOP presidential candidate a few days ago for this sort of behavior?
Apparently this “editor” wanted to shoot holes through the truth about Clinton denying Benghazi was a terrorist attack in public, while clearly calling the tragedy just that in private.
Rep. Trey Gowdy and his Select Committee have unearthed three documents — not one, not two, but three —clearly proving she did this, but since Hillary is the Democratic darling for president, the media is doing everything in its power to make this fact go the way of the dinosaur.
Kessler decided to award Rubio some Pinnocchios — accuse him of lying— by attempting to create a timeline that supports his own ridiculous theory of Hillary being a victim of “the fog of war.”
The only problem is that he leaves out two major details.
Here’s the timeline via Breitbart:
Hillary Clinton’s statements
10:08 p.m., Sept. 11, press statement:
“I condemn in the strongest terms the attack on our mission in Benghazi today. As we work to secure our personnel and facilities, we have confirmed that one of our State Department officers was killed. We are heartbroken by this terrible loss. Our thoughts and prayers are with his family and those who have suffered in this attack.
“Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet. The United States deplores any intentional effort to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. Our commitment to religious tolerance goes back to the very beginning of our nation. But let me be clear: There is never any justification for violent acts of this kind.”
11:12 p.m., Sept. 11, email to her daughter Chelsea Clinton:
“Two of our officers were killed in Benghazi by an al Qaeda-like group….very hard day and I fear more of the same.”
Now here’s what dopey Kessler didn’t want anyone to see.10:08 p.m., Sept. 11, press statement:
“I condemn in the strongest terms the attack on our mission in Benghazi today. As we work to secure our personnel and facilities, we have confirmed that one of our State Department officers was killed. We are heartbroken by this terrible loss. Our thoughts and prayers are with his family and those who have suffered in this attack.
“Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet. The United States deplores any intentional effort to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. Our commitment to religious tolerance goes back to the very beginning of our nation. But let me be clear: There is never any justification for violent acts of this kind.”
11:12 p.m., Sept. 11, email to her daughter Chelsea Clinton:
“Two of our officers were killed in Benghazi by an al Qaeda-like group….very hard day and I fear more of the same.”
6:07 p.m. – “The State Department’s Operations Center sends an email to the White House, Pentagon, FBI and other government agencies that said Ansar al-Sharia has claimed credit for the attack on its Facebook and Twitter accounts.” — Source: FactCheck.org
8:00 p.m. – Via telephone, Clinton spoke with Libyan President Mohamed Magariaf. In a description of the conversation found in State Department email, she said:
We have asked for the Libyan government to provide additional security to the compound immediately as there is a gun battle ongoing, which I understand Ansar as Sharia [sic] is claiming responsibility for.
“Ansar al Sharia is al Qaeda’s affiliate on the Arabian Peninsula. So several hours into the attack, Mrs. Clinton already believed that al Qaeda was attacking U.S. facilities.” — Source: Wall Street Journal
Now this happened two hours before Hillary blamed the attack on a YouTube video.8:00 p.m. – Via telephone, Clinton spoke with Libyan President Mohamed Magariaf. In a description of the conversation found in State Department email, she said:
We have asked for the Libyan government to provide additional security to the compound immediately as there is a gun battle ongoing, which I understand Ansar as Sharia [sic] is claiming responsibility for.
“Ansar al Sharia is al Qaeda’s affiliate on the Arabian Peninsula. So several hours into the attack, Mrs. Clinton already believed that al Qaeda was attacking U.S. facilities.” — Source: Wall Street Journal
In words, these key details missing from the timeline prove without a shadow of a doubt Clinton lied about the Benghazi terrorist attack being the result of an Internet video — an absolutely absurd claim to begin with — having been informed from the get-go it was a terrorist attack and telling others, privately, the same information.
This is a perfect example of how the left-wing media will do anything and everything to please their progressive overlords in the government and help sleazy, big government liberals keep the power in D.C.
It’s well beyond time to take the mainstream media to task for this kind of nonsense and restore integrity back to journalism.
Another problem with these relatively new "fact checking" websites...
Once they've been caught lying/misleading, they lose credibility.
I noticed The Guesser didn't bother "fact checking" all the nonsense from the Democrat debate, only Republican ones seem to come under scrutiny.
He should send his resume to these "fact checking" websites.
Once they've been caught lying/misleading, they lose credibility.
I noticed The Guesser didn't bother "fact checking" all the nonsense from the Democrat debate, only Republican ones seem to come under scrutiny.
He should send his resume to these "fact checking" websites.
This fringe idiot is proving exactly what Hillary said was true. Except he's too stupid to realize it. Nowhere in his own slanted writing is there anything that said Hillary blamed the attack on the Youtube video. In fact, there were many who thought that was a possibility. Hillary also said she was told that a terrorist group was claiming credit. The fog of war, multiple theories of the cause, was and is exactly on point.[ More evidence that shows how utterly stupid and ignorant the vile sewer rat Guesser is ]
Washington Post ‘Fact-Checker’ Leaves out Two Very Important Facts About Benghazi
Michael Cantrell
October 30, 2015 4:24 pm
Click
Like
Any time you have a liberal publication, like, oh The Washington Post, for example, calling one of their columns a “fact-checker,” you can rest assured you’re going to hear — or in this case, read — the exact opposite of the truth, particularly when it comes to liberal favorites like Hillary Clinton.
Apparently Glenn Kessler who puts together these little columns — you know, the ones with the “Pinocchios” — decided to “fact-check” Hillary on Benghazi, but rather than calling her out for her mountain of crap involving the incident, they decided to dump on Sen. Marco Rubio, calling him the liar.
So much for bipartisanship in the media, right? Gee, didn’t the MSM just get ripped to shreds by a certain GOP presidential candidate a few days ago for this sort of behavior?
Apparently this “editor” wanted to shoot holes through the truth about Clinton denying Benghazi was a terrorist attack in public, while clearly calling the tragedy just that in private.
Rep. Trey Gowdy and his Select Committee have unearthed three documents — not one, not two, but three —clearly proving she did this, but since Hillary is the Democratic darling for president, the media is doing everything in its power to make this fact go the way of the dinosaur.
Kessler decided to award Rubio some Pinnocchios — accuse him of lying— by attempting to create a timeline that supports his own ridiculous theory of Hillary being a victim of “the fog of war.”
The only problem is that he leaves out two major details.
Here’s the timeline via Breitbart:Hillary Clinton’s statementsNow here’s what dopey Kessler didn’t want anyone to see.
10:08 p.m., Sept. 11, press statement:
“I condemn in the strongest terms the attack on our mission in Benghazi today. As we work to secure our personnel and facilities, we have confirmed that one of our State Department officers was killed. We are heartbroken by this terrible loss. Our thoughts and prayers are with his family and those who have suffered in this attack.
“Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet. The United States deplores any intentional effort to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. Our commitment to religious tolerance goes back to the very beginning of our nation. But let me be clear: There is never any justification for violent acts of this kind.”
11:12 p.m., Sept. 11, email to her daughter Chelsea Clinton:
“Two of our officers were killed in Benghazi by an al Qaeda-like group….very hard day and I fear more of the same.”
6:07 p.m. – “The State Department’s Operations Center sends an email to the White House, Pentagon, FBI and other government agencies that said Ansar al-Sharia has claimed credit for the attack on its Facebook and Twitter accounts.” — Source: FactCheck.orgNow this happened two hours before Hillary blamed the attack on a YouTube video.
8:00 p.m. – Via telephone, Clinton spoke with Libyan President Mohamed Magariaf. In a description of the conversation found in State Department email, she said:
We have asked for the Libyan government to provide additional security to the compound immediately as there is a gun battle ongoing, which I understand Ansar as Sharia [sic] is claiming responsibility for.
“Ansar al Sharia is al Qaeda’s affiliate on the Arabian Peninsula. So several hours into the attack, Mrs. Clinton already believed that al Qaeda was attacking U.S. facilities.” — Source: Wall Street Journal
In words, these key details missing from the timeline prove without a shadow of a doubt Clinton lied about the Benghazi terrorist attack being the result of an Internet video — an absolutely absurd claim to begin with — having been informed from the get-go it was a terrorist attack and telling others, privately, the same information.
This is a perfect example of how the left-wing media will do anything and everything to please their progressive overlords in the government and help sleazy, big government liberals keep the power in D.C.
It’s well beyond time to take the mainstream media to task for this kind of nonsense and restore integrity back to journalism.
