Just 1-2 on the 6 point basic plays last week. kind ‘of expected. Looking back to the NFL testing those 6 to 8 point basic plays over 5 years came in under 50% at 69-73. So it certainly looks like I’ll need to focus just on the 11 point investment plays as well as the always quality Top AFS plays. Honestly, this system has never provided a constant level of action type plays. But I’ve been willing to wait for investment type opportunities.Will a statistically based system intended for the NFL work for the CFL..?
For the second time in two weeks it sets up to be a crucial spot with 3 solid AFS qualifiers this week. MON, SAS, HAM.
If laying -2.5 or less = Top AFS play
If laying -6.5 to -3 = Standard AFS play
If laying -7 or more = Basic AFS lean
AFSML for this week, all should be home chalk.
Yes even the 0-9 Roughriders of Saskatchewan, so says the system.
The forthcoming lines will dictate whether any are actually system plays.
MONTREAL | -12.8 |
SASKATCHEWAN | -10.6 |
HAMILTON | -10.6 |
CALGARY | -5.8 |
………….The testing will continue week 11……
0-1, Basic AFS leans
0-0, Standard AFS plays
2-1, Top investment AFS plays, 67% target =78%
-------------------------------------------
AFSML YTD record
13-15, Games within 6 point target ML threshold. 46%
21-7 Games within 9 points as suggested by Ace, 75%
3-0, 4 point leans
2-7, 6 point basic plays
1-0, 9 point top plays
4-2, 11 point investment plays, 67% target =77%
5-2, 9+ point plays as suggested by Ace
------------------------------------------
1-1, AFS/AFSML consensus plays, 50% target =90%