Do the Cleveland Cavs have a Shot to Win this up coming Series ? If so, Tell me why ?

Search
Joined
Jan 24, 2012
Messages
6,748
Tokens
I would expect the turnover margin to tighten up throughout the rest of the series which will certainly benefit Cleveland.
 
Joined
Jan 17, 2007
Messages
99,709
Tokens
cavs are going to stick with their gameplan in game 1
as long as they hold curry and klay to sub 40% shooting, they will want gsw's bench to beat them.
yes, barbosa (5/5) and livingston (8/10) wrecked them, but cavs will gamble on that to happen each game. from a coaching perspective, i'd rather challenge the bench to win a championship series rather than letting either klay or curry go off.

i expect tristan thompson and jr smith to probably go big at least 1 game as they will be able to dominate the paint. cavs will get their shot as i think they will continue to outrebound gsw on the offensive glass.

all will be for naught tho as gsw will take this series in 6

Where the hell was JR all night ?
 

New member
Joined
Jan 29, 2009
Messages
3,172
Tokens
Last night was a good example of why you don t let a player pick the coach. There is a big mismatch on the side lines.

I thought Lebron put added pressure on the bench going forward. So much for leadership.

My God, how about we take the first 19 seconds of the shot clock and have Irving show his handles?
 

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,503
Tokens
The Warriors made plenty of tactical mistakes. They play Anderson Varejao over Ezeli, they're still starting 2Q and 4Q w/o 1 of Curry/Klay, they just have more margin for error.

It was a 1 point game with a few mins left in the 3rd until Livingston/Iguodala/Barnes just started scoring on Irving every possession, that isn't really coaching.

OKC got stagnant vs GS, Cle got stagnant vs GS...Sensing a theme here?
 

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,503
Tokens
Last night was a good example of why you don t let a player pick the coach. There is a big mismatch on the side lines.

I thought Lebron put added pressure on the bench going forward. So much for leadership.

My God, how about we take the first 19 seconds of the shot clock and have Irving show his handles?

Added pressure on the bench going forward? Oh wow, maybe he needs sensitivity training. Teach him what a safe space is.
 

Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2004
Messages
2,957
Tokens
When Andre Iguodala was with the Sixers the fans never liked him. It was more about what he was getting paid and what they expected from him. Now that he is with Warriors he is showing how great a player he is over these last three seasons. Coming off the bench and as a complimentary player the guy is tremendous. He brings a huge amount of energy and really shines as veteran leader. It just shows that you put a player in the right situation he turns into what he was expected to be when he was originally drafted.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,503
Tokens
When Andre Iguodala was with the Sixers the fans never liked him. It was more about what he was getting paid and what they expected from him. Now that he is with Warriors he is showing how great a player he is over these last three seasons. Coming off the bench and as a complimentary player the guy is tremendous. He brings a huge amount of energy and really shines as veteran leader. It just shows that you put a player in the right situation he turns into what he was expected to be when he was originally drafted.

Elite roleplayers always look worse than they are when on a team where their responsibility is too big. He still led those teams to the playoffs even though they didn't have much talent. Has always been 1 of the best defenders in the league, very good passer and rebounder. He isn't really any better now, just in a situation where his role is more ideal. Nuggets also won 56 game the one year they had Iggy and then fell off a cliff right after. He can do everything.

If Green had to be the best player on a team, he would look a lot worse as well but he is also elite at what he does. No player can guard as many positions as he can. Similar to Lamar Odom on the Lakers but better. Lamar Odom was a weak #2 behind Kobe, but an excellent #3 best player.

Whereas someone like Kevin Love or Kyrie Irving might not be an ideal 2nd or 3rd guy for a championship team, but if you're a mediocre team then he can probably carry you to 45 wins (I know he didn't do this in Minn, but they were especially bad and almost always hurt) A lot of guys like this.
 
Joined
Jan 24, 2012
Messages
6,748
Tokens
The Warriors made plenty of tactical mistakes. They play Anderson Varejao over Ezeli, they're still starting 2Q and 4Q w/o 1 of Curry/Klay, they just have more margin for error.

It was a 1 point game with a few mins left in the 3rd until Livingston/Iguodala/Barnes just started scoring on Irving every possession, that isn't really coaching.

OKC got stagnant vs GS, Cle got stagnant vs GS...Sensing a theme here?

GS making tactical mistakes and having better players doesn't mean Lue is acquitted for his mistakes. In my mind, playing Varejao 3 minutes is less concerning than Lue's "quick, free flowing offense" turning into iso heavy, hero ball at the most important point in the game. Also, how does Channing Frye only play 7 minutes? My point was never Kerr = Pop, just that Kerr is better than Lue. I'm also inclined to give the coach some credit for getting his guys to take it at the weak link every single possession until they stop it, but maybe that's foolish on my part.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,503
Tokens
GS making tactical mistakes and having better players doesn't mean Lue is acquitted for his mistakes. In my mind, playing Varejao 3 minutes is less concerning than Lue's "quick, free flowing offense" turning into iso heavy, hero ball at the most important point in the game. Also, how does Channing Frye only play 7 minutes? My point was never Kerr = Pop, just that Kerr is better than Lue. I'm also inclined to give the coach some credit for getting his guys to take it at the weak link every single possession until they stop it, but maybe that's foolish on my part.

If the coaches switched sidelines, would you really change your assessment for the series? I wouldn't. There was some good, some bad. I think they had the right idea defensively that could've possibly helped them steal a game. It was more they just didn't execute it and GS did.

As for Frye playing 7 minutes, if it was actually close late then he might have played more but I'd bench Irving before Love right now. The problem with Frye is GS is going to switch a lot of the pick and rolls and Love can make them pay for that, as well as offensive rebound vs smaller lineups. Frye might have a quicker release but he makes switching so easy.
 

New member
Joined
Jan 4, 2007
Messages
5,985
Tokens
Whereas someone like Kevin Love or Kyrie Irving might not be an ideal 2nd or 3rd guy for a championship team, but if you're a mediocre team then he can probably carry you to 45 wins (I know he didn't do this in Minn, but they were especially bad and almost always hurt) A lot of guys like this.
this is exactly how i feel abt russell westbrook
it's going to be hard for him to fit into a championship roster or mold a surrounding cast around him but he's the one player you want when you have a team like the sixers or lakers and he is your best player.
 
Joined
Jan 24, 2012
Messages
6,748
Tokens
If the coaches switched sidelines, would you really change your assessment for the series? I wouldn't. There was some good, some bad. I think they had the right idea defensively that could've possibly helped them steal a game. It was more they just didn't execute it and GS did.

As for Frye playing 7 minutes, if it was actually close late then he might have played more but I'd bench Irving before Love right now. The problem with Frye is GS is going to switch a lot of the pick and rolls and Love can make them pay for that, as well as offensive rebound vs smaller lineups. Frye might have a quicker release but he makes switching so easy.

In that sense I agree with you. This is series is that old Jimmy's and Joe's not x's and o's deal. Warriors definitely have the better horses.

Kyrie killed the Cavs last night. He killed the Cavs with hero ball on offense and was abused on defense.
 

New member
Joined
Jan 29, 2009
Messages
3,172
Tokens
In that sense I agree with you. This is series is that old Jimmy's and Joe's not x's and o's deal. Warriors definitely have the better horses.

Kyrie killed the Cavs last night. He killed the Cavs with hero ball on offense and was abused on defense.

This team played better defense under Blatt. Theres a crisis in leadership on that team. Its insane watching Irving. He plays right into the defenses hands.
 

New member
Joined
Jan 4, 2007
Messages
5,985
Tokens
so basically russ doesn't run back on defense when he doesn't touch the ball
no surprise
 

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,503
Tokens
This team played better defense under Blatt. Theres a crisis in leadership on that team. Its insane watching Irving. He plays right into the defenses hands.

Their problem isn't leadership or a "crisis", it's that their defensive players just aren't good enough to stop the best offensive team in the league.

They had more of a defensive identity in the playoffs last year because of injuries to Irving and Love. And because Mozgov was pretty good.
 

New member
Joined
Apr 20, 2000
Messages
3,293
Tokens
Gs was using the pick and roll and clev had no answer. 2 guys ended up on curry and that leaves somebody wide open. Guys here were saYing gs doesnt have a chance. Curry and thompson were held to 20 points combined and they sill won by 20
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,109,358
Messages
13,459,405
Members
99,473
Latest member
mrsanchy5
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com