everyone with an IQ north of 75 and a credit score north of 475 knows this, including Mueller who's flailing away about anything and everything EXCEPT crimes actually committed by the Trump campaign. May god bless his misguided soul
everyone with an IQ north of 75 and a credit score north of 475 knows this, including Mueller who's flailing away about anything and everything EXCEPT crimes actually committed by the Trump campaign. May god bless his misguided soul
everyone with an IQ north of 75 and a credit score north of 475 knows this, including Mueller who's flailing away about anything and everything EXCEPT crimes actually committed by the Trump campaign. May god bless his misguided soul
cheersgif
LET'S TALK ABOUT WITNESS TAMPERING GIVEN THE IMPRISONMENT OF MANAFORT ON FRIDAY...
MARK LEVIN· SATURDAY, JUNE 16, 2018
No one has done more witness tampering than Robert Mueller and his partisan team of Democrat-supporting prosecutors. Look at his prosecutorial tactics, aimed at breaking financially and emotionally one individual after another, for the purpose of getting them to cooperate or plead. In particular, witness his extraordinary abuses of power in the treatment of Paul Manafort, for the purpose of crushing his will and turning him against the president. It's truly appalling. Yet, when the government (Mueller) does such things, it's not consider witness tampering. No, it's said to be the pursuit of justice.
MARK LEVIN· SATURDAY, JUNE 16, 2018
No one has done more witness tampering than Robert Mueller and his partisan team of Democrat-supporting prosecutors. Look at his prosecutorial tactics, aimed at breaking financially and emotionally one individual after another, for the purpose of getting them to cooperate or plead. In particular, witness his extraordinary abuses of power in the treatment of Paul Manafort, for the purpose of crushing his will and turning him against the president. It's truly appalling. Yet, when the government (Mueller) does such things, it's not consider witness tampering. No, it's said to be the pursuit of justice.
everyone with an IQ north of 75 and a credit score north of 475 knows this, including Mueller who's flailing away about anything and everything EXCEPT crimes actually committed by the Trump campaign. May god bless his misguided soul
Thinking that something is "over" because a pea brained putz SAYS is over is not just stupid, it's COMICALLY stupid-as is the fact that you can't answer even ONE of my questions, lol.
ointer:Shush()*Slapping-silly90)):hammeritLoser!@#0azzkick(&^Slapping-silly90))Loser!@#0kth)(&^azzkick(&^^^
:madasshol:trx-smly0:tongue2::Countdown:fckmad:You-and the author of that article-are f*%king morons. Mueller is, arguably, the most respected law enforcement person EVER, having led the FBI the longest of anybody in history, except for Hoover, who, obviously, was scum. He was praised by members of both parties, until he had the temerity to dig deep into the affairs of a turd who has been a welching, stiffing, dishonest prick his whole life, that being Dump. And Manafort is ANOTHER fat, felonious, fuckwad who had ALREADY violated the terms of his bail once before by stupidly ghost writing a piece to a (wait for it!)a Russian, the very same Russian he stupidly contacted(along with one other party), literally, the day after the latest charges were leveled against him-and you're arguing that, somehow, he has been treated unfairly. Sheriff Jagoff, your head is shoved way up your ass, don't bother to unplug it, you're hopeless. You're almost as stupid as the idiot who originated this thread, who ran his big, stupid mouth for MONTHS talking about how weak the government's case was , but, judging by his behavior, it doesn't appear that Manafort thought it was so weak, does it?
ointer:Shush()*Slapping-silly90)):hammeritazzkick(&^Loser!@#0kth)(&^azzkick(&^:cripwalk:Stop-SS--oh my- you just broke the case- it wasn't oj - it was trump!!for all intents and purposes
only the fucking idiots are still grasping for straws
Mueller has moved on, he's trying to justify him wasting time and money by finding OTHER CRIMES to pursue
I wonder if he can go after OJ? ummmmm
Anutta winna, sources say OJ, having covered for Trump all these years, is about to flip
You brain dead scumbag, the guy you said had bogus charges against him now has way MORE charges than when you started making a complete and utter fool of yourself, plus, he's in jail on a charge that's 20 years all by itself. STFU, asshole, you're embarrassing yourself even more than normal.
ointer:Shush()*Slapping-silly90)):hammeritazzkick(&^Loser!@#0kth)(&^azzkick(&^:cripwalk:Stop-SS--You-and the author of that article-are f*%king morons. Mueller is, arguably, the most respected law enforcement person EVER, having led the FBI the longest of anybody in history, except for Hoover, who, obviously, was scum. He was praised by members of both parties, until he had the temerity to dig deep into the affairs of a turd who has been a welching, stiffing, dishonest prick his whole life, that being Dump. And Manafort is ANOTHER fat, felonious, fuckwad who had ALREADY violated the terms of his bail once before by stupidly ghost writing a piece to a (wait for it!)a Russian, the very same Russian he stupidly contacted(along with one other party), literally, the day after the latest charges were leveled against him-and you're arguing that, somehow, he has been treated unfairly. Sheriff Jagoff, your head is shoved way up your ass, don't bother to unplug it, you're hopeless. You're almost as stupid as the idiot who originated this thread, who ran his big, stupid mouth for MONTHS talking about how weak the government's case was , but, judging by his behavior, it doesn't appear that Manafort thought it was so weak, does it?
ROTLFMAO!!!!!! You gotta lotta balls showing your face, but, you're a dumb bastard, so you're unaware of that. If what you say is true, Jagoff, why is Paulie likely sitting his fat ass on a toilet a few feet from his bunk? Why did he feel the need to try and tamper with multiple witnesses, Dickweed? Why have 20 people/entities, the overwhelmingly number of which are Russian, been indicted with 5 guilty pleas? Why is Twittler concerned about Michael Cohen(who just happens to have a Russian oligarch father-in-law and numerous shady Russian contacts, one of whom just plead guilty and was his long time partner)flipping if he, Dump, is innocent? You have no answers to ANY of those questions because, one, there ARE no answers, and, two, you're a moron. C'mon, "update" us on how weak the case against Manafort is, schmuck. ointer:Shush()*Slapping-silly90)):hammeritLoser!@#0azzkick(&^Slapping-silly90))Loser!@#0kth)(&^azzkick(&^^^:madasshol:trx-smly0:tongue2::Countdown:fckmad:Slapping-silly90))Loser!@#0kth)(&^azzkick(&^^^:madasshol:trx-smly0:tongue2::Countdown:fckmad:Slapping-silly90))Loser!@#0kth)(&^azzkick(&^^^:madasshol:trx-smly0:tongue2::Countdown:fckmad:
ointer:Shush()*Slapping-silly90)):hammeritLoser!@#0azzkick(&^Slapping-silly90))Loser!@#0kth)(&^azzkick(&^^^:madasshol:trx-smly0:tongue2::Countdown:fckmad:Slapping-silly90))Loser!@#0kth)(&^azzkick(&^^^:madasshol:trx-smly0:tongue2::Countdown:fckmad:Slapping-silly90))Loser!@#0kth)(&^azzkick(&^^^:madasshol:trx-smly0:tongue2::Countdown:fckmad:
ROTLFMAO!!!!!! You gotta lotta balls showing your face, but, you're a dumb bastard, so you're unaware of that. If what you say is true, Jagoff, why is Paulie likely sitting his fat ass on a toilet a few feet from his bunk? Why did he feel the need to try and tamper with multiple witnesses, Dickweed? Why have 20 people/entities, the overwhelmingly number of which are Russian, been indicted with 5 guilty pleas? Why is Twittler concerned about Michael Cohen(who just happens to have a Russian oligarch father-in-law and numerous shady Russian contacts, one of whom just plead guilty and was his long time partner)flipping if he, Dump, is innocent? You have no answers to ANY of those questions because, one, there ARE no answers, and, two, you're a moron. C'mon, "update" us on how weak the case against Manafort is, schmuck.
You brain dead scumbag, the guy you said had bogus charges against him now has way MORE charges than when you started making a complete and utter fool of yourself, plus, he's in jail on a charge that's 20 years all by itself. STFU, asshole, you're embarrassing yourself even more than normal.
He wants to report people....Yet he is the 1 cursing out posters.
You brain dead scumbag
STFU, asshole
ROTLFMAO!!!!!! You gotta lotta balls showing your face, but, you're a dumb bastard, so you're unaware of that. If what you say is true, Jagoff, why is Paulie likely sitting his fat ass on a toilet a few feet from his bunk? Why did he feel the need to try and tamper with multiple witnesses, Dickweed? Why have 20 people/entities, the overwhelmingly number of which are Russian, been indicted with 5 guilty pleas? Why is Twittler concerned about Michael Cohen(who just happens to have a Russian oligarch father-in-law and numerous shady Russian contacts, one of whom just plead guilty and was his long time partner)flipping if he, Dump, is innocent? You have no answers to ANY of those questions because, one, there ARE no answers, and, two, you're a moron. C'mon, "update" us on how weak the case against Manafort is, schmuck.
He wants to report people....Yet he is the 1 cursing out posters.
you're a dumb bastard
You're probably gonna reach 88,000 posts in a few hours, in almost exactly 11 years, Eight...thousand...posts per year. Get a LIFE, you brain dead turd.
ointer:Shush()*Slapping-silly90)):hammeritLoser!@#0azzkick(&^Slapping-silly90))Loser!@#0kth)(&^azzkick(&^^^:madasshol:trx-smly0:tongue2::Countdown:fckmad:Slapping-silly90))Loser!@#0kth)(&^azzkick(&^^^:madasshol:trx-smly0:tongue2::Countdown:fckmad:Slapping-silly90))Loser!@#0kth)(&^azzkick(&^^^:madasshol:trx-smly0:tongue2::Countdown:fckmad:ROTFLMAO, many idiots around here sprayed their shorts when Ellis "admonished" Mueller's guys for "overreaching," but, at the time many slightly more knowledgeable people pointed out that, one, judges who've been around for as long as Ellis have often become very independent, at least, early on in judicial proceedings, and, that, two, they talk a lotta shit early on in this manner, if only to give the appearance of doubt in a slam dunk case-like THIS one-but, when it comes down to actually writing a ruling, they usually give an expected ruling. C'mon, Witless Willie, haven't heard any spot on analysis from you about the weakness of the government's case in QUITE some time now, any reason for that?ointer:Shush()*:hammeritazzkick(&^Slapping-silly90))Loser!@#0kth)(&^
https://www.vox.com/2018/6/26/17507478/manafort-mueller-judge-ellis-virginia
Nothing is going right for Paul Manafort lately
He just lost his last-ditch attempt to dismiss Robert Mueller’s Virginia case against him.
By Andrew Prokopandrew@vox.com Jun 26, 2018, 5:30pm EDT
The news just keeps getting worse for Paul Manafort.
A week and a half after the former Trump campaign chair was sent to jail by a Washington, DC, judge to await trial, he lost his best chance left to reduce the number of charges against him.
On Tuesday, Judge T.S. Ellis of the Eastern District of Virginia ruled against Manafort’s motion to dismiss his indictment in the state — meaning his trial there will go forward.
Manafort’s lawyers had challenged Robert Mueller’s authority to prosecute him under the special counsel regulation. But Judge Ellis concluded that Mueller’s appointment “was consistent with both the Constitution and relevant federal statutes,” so dismissal of the indictment was “not appropriate here.”
Manafort had already lost a similar bid to challenge Mueller’s authority in Washington, DC, where he is facing a separate trial on separate charges. Judge Amy Berman Jackson had ruled that it was “logical and appropriate” for the special counsel to investigate Manafort.
But Trump allies had been hopeful for a different outcome in Virginia — mainly because of a hearing last month in which Judge Ellis was pretty tough on Mueller’s team.
Manafort’s team had high hopes for how Judge Ellis would rule — and they were disappointed
Ellis, a 78-year-old Ronald Reagan appointee, freely opined in court that Mueller was only charging Manafort as a way to “get” Trump, and questioned whether he should have “unfettered power to do that.”
Given the seeming strength of much of the evidence against Manafort, and the number of charges he’s facing (now seven counts in DC, and 18 in Virginia), he’s had little to be optimistic about so far.
But here was an apparent chance to change the narrative. It seemed unlikely, but if Judge Ellis did go so far as to throw out the Virginia indictment, it would be a major embarrassment for Mueller, and seriously reduce the number of charges Manafort had to face (from 25 counts to a mere seven!).
That, however, did not pan out.
Ellis did indeed reiterate his critical view of Mueller’s intentions in his ruling Tuesday. He warned of “the danger unleashed when political disagreements are transformed into partisan prosecutions.” And, in a footnote, he opined that “even a blind person can see that the true target of the Special Counsel’s investigation is President Trump,” not Manafort.
However, he also acknowledged that such a prosecutorial tactic was “neither uncommon nor illegal.” And he found that Mueller, as special counsel, “had legal authority to investigate and to prosecute this matter.” So, he concluded, dismissal of the indictment isn’t warranted, and the case will move forward.
Manafort’s Virginia trial is scheduled to begin on July 25. It will likely conclude before his DC trial begins on September 17. If Manafort is thinking of “flipping” and striking a plea deal, as many believe Mueller wants, we’ve seen no sign of that yet. But the time to do so would be now, in the remaining month before that first trial starts.
ointer:Shush()*:hammeritazzkick(&^Slapping-silly90))Loser!@#0kth)(&^https://www.vox.com/2018/6/26/17507478/manafort-mueller-judge-ellis-virginia
Nothing is going right for Paul Manafort lately
He just lost his last-ditch attempt to dismiss Robert Mueller’s Virginia case against him.
By Andrew Prokopandrew@vox.com Jun 26, 2018, 5:30pm EDT
The news just keeps getting worse for Paul Manafort.
A week and a half after the former Trump campaign chair was sent to jail by a Washington, DC, judge to await trial, he lost his best chance left to reduce the number of charges against him.
On Tuesday, Judge T.S. Ellis of the Eastern District of Virginia ruled against Manafort’s motion to dismiss his indictment in the state — meaning his trial there will go forward.
Manafort’s lawyers had challenged Robert Mueller’s authority to prosecute him under the special counsel regulation. But Judge Ellis concluded that Mueller’s appointment “was consistent with both the Constitution and relevant federal statutes,” so dismissal of the indictment was “not appropriate here.”
Manafort had already lost a similar bid to challenge Mueller’s authority in Washington, DC, where he is facing a separate trial on separate charges. Judge Amy Berman Jackson had ruled that it was “logical and appropriate” for the special counsel to investigate Manafort.
But Trump allies had been hopeful for a different outcome in Virginia — mainly because of a hearing last month in which Judge Ellis was pretty tough on Mueller’s team.
Manafort’s team had high hopes for how Judge Ellis would rule — and they were disappointed
Ellis, a 78-year-old Ronald Reagan appointee, freely opined in court that Mueller was only charging Manafort as a way to “get” Trump, and questioned whether he should have “unfettered power to do that.”
Given the seeming strength of much of the evidence against Manafort, and the number of charges he’s facing (now seven counts in DC, and 18 in Virginia), he’s had little to be optimistic about so far.
But here was an apparent chance to change the narrative. It seemed unlikely, but if Judge Ellis did go so far as to throw out the Virginia indictment, it would be a major embarrassment for Mueller, and seriously reduce the number of charges Manafort had to face (from 25 counts to a mere seven!).
That, however, did not pan out.
Ellis did indeed reiterate his critical view of Mueller’s intentions in his ruling Tuesday. He warned of “the danger unleashed when political disagreements are transformed into partisan prosecutions.” And, in a footnote, he opined that “even a blind person can see that the true target of the Special Counsel’s investigation is President Trump,” not Manafort.
However, he also acknowledged that such a prosecutorial tactic was “neither uncommon nor illegal.” And he found that Mueller, as special counsel, “had legal authority to investigate and to prosecute this matter.” So, he concluded, dismissal of the indictment isn’t warranted, and the case will move forward.
Manafort’s Virginia trial is scheduled to begin on July 25. It will likely conclude before his DC trial begins on September 17. If Manafort is thinking of “flipping” and striking a plea deal, as many believe Mueller wants, we’ve seen no sign of that yet. But the time to do so would be now, in the remaining month before that first trial starts.
y'know he's the first person to flag people, they all do, it's a genetic thing
then they e-mail mods, then they fight with mods, then they get banned
and then they threaten to BUY THERX and fire the mods
they're just so damn fucking stupid
