Did OJ Murder Nicole and Ron Goldman?

Search

Did OJ Murder Nicole and Ron Goldman?


  • Total voters
    79

Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2011
Messages
4,313
Tokens
5 out of 25 people in this poll expressed doubt .. divide by 2 .. and have two trials with these posters as the jury

and he walks 2 more times .. thats 0-3 .. with your eyewitness being dog ' arf arf ' Marcia Clark using that as her timeline .. gtfoh
 

Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2011
Messages
4,313
Tokens
yeah it does REDEYE says allot .. anyone that voted for Marcia Clark / Durden instead of OJ is not someone
I would be inclined to spend anytime around and or enjoy a fine beverage with
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
44,966
Tokens
yeah it does REDEYE says allot .. anyone that voted for Marcia Clark / Durden instead of OJ is not someone
I would be inclined to spend anytime around and or enjoy a fine beverage with

So OJ had a history of beating the shit out of her, she said in the weeks before the murder that OJ was going to kill her, OJ's blood/DNA is all
over the crime scene, his footprints are all over the crime scene, OJ's own lawyers knew he was guilty, OJ got caught lying about
anything and everything in the case - but you say he's innocent.

Wheee!!!!!!!
 

Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2011
Messages
4,313
Tokens
ZIT .. " OJ got caught lying " ?!? he didnt even take the stand .. he wanted to desperately but his lawyers wouldnt allow him too
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
32,861
Tokens
kato_bigger.JPG
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
32,861
Tokens
[h=1]EXCLUSIVE: Kato Kaelin Talks OJ Simpson Parole: 'This Will Not Be the Final Chapter of OJ Simpson'[/h]
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
44,966
Tokens
ZIT .. " OJ got caught lying " ?!? he didnt even take the stand .. he wanted to desperately but his lawyers wouldnt allow him too

You are really stupid. I didn't say he was on the stand when he lied. He lied during depositions, he's been lying about the case for 25 years.

Watch him lie about beating the shit out of Nicole, and claiming the bruises were from a "horror movie" they were making.

Watch him lie about owning Bruno Magli shoes, and then look at the look on his face when he realizes there are photographs out there of
him wearing them.

 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
44,966
Tokens
In these deposition tapes, Petrocelli is seen grilling Simpson about his alleged role in the murders, covering everything from physical evidence to photographs of Simpson's shoes.

Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman's killer left a key piece of evidence at the crime scene -- a men's size 12 Bruno Magli brand shoe print stamped in the victims' blood.

Only 9 percent of the U.S. population wears a size 12 shoe, according to Petrocelli, and only 299 pairs of Bruno Magli shoes in that size have ever been sold in the U.S., meaning it's not a common shoe, Petrocelli said. During the deposition, Petrocelli asks Simpson if he ever bought Bruno Magli shoes. Simpson says, "No."

"I know that Bruno Magli makes shoes that look like the shoes they had in court that's involved with this case, I would have never worn those ugly ass shoes," Simpson says.

When Petrocelli presses Simpson to elaborate on why he thought they were ugly, Simpson says he didn't like "the look of them, the style of them."

"They were ugly to me. Esthetically, I felt that they were ugly and I guess beauty is in the eye of the beholder, and to me they were ugly shoes," he said.

After Simpson says he thought the Bruno Magli shoes were "ugly," Petrocelli shows him a photograph, which was first published in the National Enquirer, showing Simpson wearing Bruno Magli shoes at a football game nine months before the murders.

"His story was, 'well yeah, that's me in the picture, but those are not my shoes,'" Petrocelli told "20/20." "He says, 'I don't remember what shoes I had on that day... but I didn't have those shoes on,' because he knew that those were the killer's shoes."

During the deposition, Petrocelli asks Simpson if the man in the photo was him. "It appears to be me, yes," Simpson responded. Petrocelli goes on to ask Simpson if he could describe the jacket he is wearing in the photo and asks if he remembered wearing it. To both questions, Simpson just says, "No." Then Petrocelli brings up the shoes again.

Petrocelli: "Looking at the close up of the shoes, can you believe that those were shoes that you owned at the time?"
Simpson: "No."

By the time the civil trial began in 1997, 30 more photographs of Simpson wearing the same Bruno Magli shoes were entered into evidence.



[ LOL.. OJ is claiming that the picture is him, but somehow the picture is doctored because he wasn't wearing those shoes... yeah, right OJ you fucking piece of shit ]

 

Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2006
Messages
2,481
Tokens
Hard to believe anyone thinks there's a chance he could be not guilty. And for the record- being found not guilty is not the same thing and being found "innocent"
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Jan 15, 2010
Messages
28,331
Tokens
He did testify in the civil case. To think he's innocent you'd really have to believe he was set up by the police and they are all... or most in on it. There is so much evidence, that I believe he did not plan to murder her. Was probably stalking her and snapped when he saw the other guy show up. The evidence is overwhelming. There's so much physical evidence, motive, plus circumstantial evidence. There's really no other rational conclusion to come to.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
5,391
Tokens
If you believe he's innocent, then you have to believe the LAPD all spontaneously decided "Hey, let's frame OJ because he's black!" after the call came in to investigate two dead bodies.

If you believe that, you likely don't even care whether he really is innocent or guilty...you're just happy he got off because he's black and oppressed.

Which would make you an idiot.
 

Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2006
Messages
12,822
Tokens
All the so called evidence in the world could not win a trial against him. He was found innocent, GET OVER IT!

If cop gives you a ticket for speeding 80 in a 65 and you take it to a lawyer who gets you out of it, does that mean you weren’t soeeding? Same concept
 

Member
Joined
May 27, 2007
Messages
39,464
Tokens
It's pretty simple.

O.J.'s DNA was found at the scene of a brutal double murder and Nicole and Ron's DNA were found on his clothes and in his bronco.

Put aside all the other overwhelming evidence against him. What else do you need to know to know he's 100% guilty?
 
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
20,329
Tokens
Zit you're arguing with a "Bush & Cheney Did 9/11" idiot. Don't waste your time.

Years later & this worthless clown still obsesses over me. Keep posting avatars of attractive women because that is the closest you will get to one kid.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,117,952
Messages
13,549,682
Members
100,549
Latest member
apptaixiuonl
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com