It's hard to believe that the best the A's could get is a back up outfielder and infielder, a three starter at best, and a catcher who may never see the light of the big leagues.
This is a horrible deal for the A's. Gaudin might be better than Gallagher and they are around the same age.
This deal makes no sense. I don't know what drove the A's to do this trade. It's hard for me to believe that the trade they made was the best they could get for a guy like Harden. Unless the A's know something about Harden's health that we don't.
Gallagher is the only one that has any potential, and he isn't good. I don't see this one panning out for him, although I agree that he has been the man in the past.Don't doubt Billy Beane. The guy has a way of trading for random players who turn into excellent ones.
Mark Mulder, Dan Haren, Tim Hudson, Barry Zito...
Then he trades them at their top value to reload without having to pay.
His deals always look bad on paper but most of the times they turn out great. I'll give him the benefit of the doubt.
Don't doubt Billy Beane. The guy has a way of trading for random players who turn into excellent ones.
Mark Mulder, Dan Haren, Tim Hudson, Barry Zito...
Then he trades them at their top value to reload without having to pay.
His deals always look bad on paper but most of the times they turn out great. I'll give him the benefit of the doubt.