Did it alter the shot? Yes or no. The answer is yes, thus it was a foul. Simple as that. Whether it was in the first 10 seconds of the game or the last 10 seconds.That's a foul that was only called because the moment was too big for the ref. I don't think that foul was called for the first 39 minutes and 58 seconds. I hate games being decided by bullshit
Nobody can take anything away from SD St. They're having a great run and could have won in OT. Creighton was gassed, no bench. And they can't overcome foul trouble
Agree with that alsoIf that’s a foul, the walkons are playing at the end. Maybe the waterboy
Soft as soft can be. Much worse allowed all game long, every game ever played
"I swear I'm not a conspiracy theorist" followed by conspiracy theories lol. He called for a replay because he saw the refs blew the whistle to say the game wasn't over as time expired. He was emotional because he almost cost them the game on that that turnover. I would have reacted the same way feeling awful. He had his hands over his head on that turnover like he gave up the game winning bucket and not he game tying bucket. He came over to hug his family after the win and yes he didn't look entirely happy because a part of him had to feel bad that his brother lost just as big of a game so he knew it was bitter sweet for his family.Can we talk about Adam Seiko? I swear, I’m not a conspiracy theorist, but I seriously think he was trying to throw that game. His actions were pretty damn weird. He threw the inbounds pass thst let Creighton tie the game. Then, after the buzzer, he was calling for a replay for time to be added to the clock. He looked like he was bummed that they lost. Please tell me someone else noticed this!