Exactly! Not saying it wasn't a foul at all. I've been reading all around many comments how many people feel the call shouldn't have been made at that point in the game esp the deciding factor win or lose. Throughout the game I'm sure there were many fouls that weren't called that should of been called. It definitely was a foul though
Should not have been called.HORRIBLE CALL, let them decide it in OT,very small amount of contact for all the contact fouls they let go Some will say a foul is a foul, but they let fouls go all game then call that with ons second.Just like SB is correct that PI should of been a No call also, it decided the game.SD st down by 1 or 2 I am ok with that foul, tied game No way should be called.Truth to be told thats how most refs call it, tied game unless shooter is somewhat asssaulted they let it go to OT.Think what you wantShit call and the wrong cal.And No money on game and my wife and son both graduated from San diego state, so I am happy they are in final four, but come on as physical as SD st is and they call that garbage.
Creighton 2-17 from the 3 pt line and they scored 56 total points. That's what lost them the game. The people bitching about a clear foul with less than 10 seconds left lost money. A foul is a foul and when you push someone in the back to alter a shot its a foul. Always has been always will be.
That's a foul that was only called because the moment was too big for the ref. I don't think that foul was called for the first 39 minutes and 58 seconds. I hate games being decided by bullshit
Nobody can take anything away from SD St. They're having a great run and could have won in OT. Creighton was gassed, no bench. And they can't overcome foul trouble
Nobody can take anything away from SD St. They're having a great run and could have won in OT. Creighton was gassed, no bench. And they can't overcome foul trouble
Did it alter the shot? Yes or no. The answer is yes, thus it was a foul. Simple as that. Whether it was in the first 10 seconds of the game or the last 10 seconds.
Agree with that also
Can we talk about Adam Seiko? I swear, I’m not a conspiracy theorist, but I seriously think he was trying to throw that game. His actions were pretty damn weird. He threw the inbounds pass thst let Creighton tie the game. Then, after the buzzer, he was calling for a replay for time to be added to the clock. He looked like he was bummed that they lost. Please tell me someone else noticed this!
"I swear I'm not a conspiracy theorist" followed by conspiracy theories lol. He called for a replay because he saw the refs blew the whistle to say the game wasn't over as time expired. He was emotional because he almost cost them the game on that that turnover. I would have reacted the same way feeling awful. He had his hands over his head on that turnover like he gave up the game winning bucket and not he game tying bucket. He came over to hug his family after the win and yes he didn't look entirely happy because a part of him had to feel bad that his brother lost just as big of a game so he knew it was bitter sweet for his family.
This is exactly the same type of stuff people were saying about Butler after he cost SDSU the game vs Arkansas with that turnover. The internet was calling for investigations on point shaving and throwing the game... yet all season long he contributed to the Aztec's success including the buzzer 3 @ UNM and going 8/11 vs Creighton.
Everyone I know that thinks games are thrown or rigged has never played high school or college sports. If you have you would know that crazier shit has happened.
