I always thought that you were an assshole but now I understand . My program always figured that the most Drunk Driver is the Designated Driver. Who could complain then if you died and were a passenger in any car? Of course, if you were driving another car, you may have a beef. Good Luck to All!
It's a facade. Drunk driving is allowed to exist for population control. It makes zero sense to place the responsibility to get behind the wheel while drinking solely in the hands of the person who has been drinking and at that point in time incapable of making an important decision. Of course the drunk the person is going to be convinced they are cool to drive it is because they are drunk and their judgements are impaired.
The way I see it is most DUI's occur from drinking in a place of business or at a party. Nobody who is getting shit faced at home is trying to get behind the wheel of their car. So why not require bars and shit to set up a security where you must turn in your keys and in order to get your keys back you must pass a sobriety test in the bar and if you fail then go in the back and sleep it off or they will call you a cab. As for party throwers they need to make the penalty for allowing someone shitfaced to get behind the wheel such a punishable crime so they will be more responsible for the people they allow to drink in their home or place of event.
The way I see it is most DUI's occur from drinking in a place of business or at a party. Nobody who is getting shit faced at home is trying to get behind the wheel of their car. So why not require bars and shit to set up a security where you must turn in your keys and in order to get your keys back you must pass a sobriety test in the bar and if you fail then go in the back and sleep it off or they will call you a cab. As for party throwers they need to make the penalty for allowing someone shitfaced to get behind the wheel such a punishable crime so they will be more responsible for the people they allow to drink in their home or place of event.
This is very easy to solve.
People are going to drink and drive.
So pass a law that if you drive under 25MPH you can be as drunk as you want. If you drive over 30MPH drunk you get 25 years minimum. Problem solved. Almost no one dies at 20 MPH.
The way the laws are now, you are encouraged to drive on a highway cause you are a lot more likely to get pulled over for running a stop sign or making an illegal turn by not being on a highway. Every drunk driver I know thinks the highway is safer. The law should change this. DUI prison stays should go up immensely based on driving speed.
People are going to drink and drive.
So pass a law that if you drive under 25MPH you can be as drunk as you want. If you drive over 30MPH drunk you get 25 years minimum. Problem solved. Almost no one dies at 20 MPH.
The way the laws are now, you are encouraged to drive on a highway cause you are a lot more likely to get pulled over for running a stop sign or making an illegal turn by not being on a highway. Every drunk driver I know thinks the highway is safer. The law should change this. DUI prison stays should go up immensely based on driving speed.
Bad deal for everybody involved.......the passenger chose to ride with the drunk driver. I hate the law that charges a drunk driver with intoxication manslaughter for a "willing to ride" passenger. If they are going to charge people with that, then they might as well charge dwi suspects with passengers with attempted intoxication manslaughter.
And for whoever thinks cars need interlocks on them or whatever, do you not enjoy your rights or living in a free country?
And for whoever thinks cars need interlocks on them or whatever, do you not enjoy your rights or living in a free country?
